|This page was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.|
Please don't change the essence of this essay
The purpose of this essay is to express the an opinion that BLP2E is not a valid argument supported by policy. It is intended to express this POV and is well within policy in doing so.
Inks.LWC (talk · contribs) recently edited this essay to express other points of view in a more NPOV style. I encourage folks to contribute to the essay but if you want to change the opinion expressed or otherwise document a disagreement, please do it in a separate essay rather than co-opting the spirit of this one.
I'm not trying to own this, rather as stated in How to improve essays, "When your viewpoint differs significantly from that expressed in an essay, it may be best to start a new essay of your own to provide a rebuttal or alternative view. Essays putting forward opposing views normally prominently link to each other."
- I'm not expressing a different viewpoint, simply stating the other side of the viewpoint. When you've titled it BLP2E, there's not really a title that supporters of BLP2E can use. Perhaps move your essay to opposition to BLP2E, but just an essay of BLP2E should remain at least somewhat neutral. If you don't want that done, I suggest moving this into your own userspace. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2011 (UTC)