Wikipedia talk:Edit warring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Peacedove.svg The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing. Changes to this page do not immediately change policy anyway, so don't panic.
WikiProject Policy and Guidelines
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of the Policy and Guidelines WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 

Contents

Question[edit]

Can I ask a question about 3RR here? (if not let me know where I should be asking this and I'll delete it). If an editor adds content to a page, and the content does not violate WP policy, and it gets reverted by another editor (editor 2), can't editor 1 just "win" the war by making his 3rd revert right after editor 2 makes his 3rd revert? If editor 1 isn't changing anything already written, but just adding more, then can't he always win this war (I know it's not about winning, and it should go to dispute resolution). And what if editor 2 brings in a friend who then also reverts editor 1's addition, then I guess editor 1 would be fresh out of reverts? Capuchinpilates (talk) 04:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

There's more to edit-warring than just 3RR. If they're acting in bad faith then they should be reported at WP:ANEW regardless. But honestly at that point both parties have been behaving badly; why hasn't either one opened a discussion? DonIago (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)