Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarcophaga africa.jpg

Reason: Good quality, lighting and EV. Illustrates the scavenger article quite well. Also, long time since a fly was nominated here. Already an FP at commons.
Articles this image appears in: Sarcophaga africa, Forensic entomology, Scavenger, Flesh-fly
Creator: Muhammad Mahdi Karim

Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 08:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a similar image in Flesh-fly but they are found in exclusive articles otherwise. The meat in the picture provides separate enc to the faeces. I should hope that it isn't human flesh. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support; not your best, but certainly decent. EV would be improved if it appeared in an article about the species. J Milburn (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Now appears in the newly created article Sarcophaga africa thanks to User:IP69.226.103.13. --Muhammad(talk) 12:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To many fucking flies already, I have counted at least 4 pictures of flies as featured pictures in the last 8 months. Please find yourself another fetish.

Comment was added by 201.166.32.84 (talk) on 14:04, 23 December 2009. Might relate to this. Elekhh (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Support 201.166 has it wrong. I think only these fucking flies:
flies
have been promoted to FP recently (no idea, but irresistible to respond thus). This FPC is about a flesh-eating fly, others have been about shit-eating flies, not fucking flies. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please find some other place to act like idiots. -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 06:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support nice depth of view for such a macro -- Chris 73 | Talk 06:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Good technical quality, nice composition. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 14:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sarcophaga africa.jpg --jjron (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]