Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pittsburgh at dawn
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2011 at 04:02:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good quality, very aesthetically pleasing, good EV. Suggested at PPR by User:MiG.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Pittsburgh, Mount Washington (Pittsburgh)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Matthew Field
- Support as nominator --Jujutacular talk 04:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support as co-nominator As per the reasons above. -- MiG (talk) 07:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Shame, though, that in the bottom corners you can see a fence/rail/wall from where the picture was taken. Overall though I think this looks good. Anoldtreeok (talk) 04:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support, per nom. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 09:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but too dark in my opinion. As a side note, it's also slightly leaning upward. - Blieusong (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Support aesthetically pleasing and a brilliant work. Hariya1234 122.163.202.2 (talk) 16:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- For reference. Hariya1234, could you perhaps log in and confirm that this comment was left by you? Often, the votes of anonymous users are not counted. J Milburn (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note, Hariya has now confirmed that this was their edit. Jujutacular talk 03:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- For reference. Hariya1234, could you perhaps log in and confirm that this comment was left by you? Often, the votes of anonymous users are not counted. J Milburn (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support that is a wonderful group of shots. Its even better in person or when the sky is fully dark. --Guerillero | My Talk 20:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- support a solid pic and I'm a sucker for Cityscapes.©Geni 20:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- strong Oppose it doesn't wonder me that a small, sharp night picture are getting so many support votes here. But the image has perspective distortions, at the right to the middle it is underexposed and at the right overexposed, the edges at the bottom right and left are really very ugly. Because of the evening I don't see a huge or good EV, too. --kaʁstn 12:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- A daytime or blue-hour version would be nice, but this version is a bit dark and unexciting, and nowhere as good as some of the night-time urban panoramas that we have. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Promoted File:Pittsburgh dawn city pano.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)