User talk:Billbuchanan

Centre for distributed computing and security[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Centre for distributed computing and security, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://buchananweb.co.uk/res_main.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Centre for distributed computing and security[edit]

A tag has been placed on Centre for distributed computing and security requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard^(Bloom) 18:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Prof bill buchanan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Prof bill buchanan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Bill2.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bill2.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image[edit]

Dear Professor Buchanan,

I understand that you are attempting to upload your image onto Wikipedia. I would like to confirm that you are actually indeed the copyright holder. Under the copyright law of most countries, the copyright of the image belongs exclusively to the photographer or his/her employer and can only be transferred via signed written statement or operation of law (e.g., inheritance). If the copyright has not been explicitly transferred to you, then I will need to get the licensing release from the appropriate person. If you do not know who the copyright holder is and/or cannot contact this person, then I'm afraid we cannot use this photo. I apologize for the inconvenience, but it is a policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to strongly respect creators' copyrights.

Also, you did not specify an acceptable copyright license. One of our main goals is that anyone can copy any of our content for any reason. Therefore, it is essential that you specify the terms and conditions under which we can use your picture, and that these terms are compatible with our goals. Whatever license you choose must allow the photo to be freely copied and modified by anyone (including third parties not affiliated with Wikipedia), for any purpose (subject to applicable laws). We strongly suggest using the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license: Please read http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ and let us know if you agree with the terms and conditions listed there.

Please note that only the copyright holder can make such a release. Simply owning a copy of the photo (print or digital) is not the same as being the copyright holder. In most cases, this will be the photographer or his/her employer, unless those rights have been passed to someone else via written statement or operation of law.

If you believe you can satisfy this criteria, please email photosubmissionwikimedia.org.

Have a nice day,

NW (Talk) 17:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]