Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/Similar: Difference between revisions
→Hereford (2): horizontal scrolling |
→Red Thunder: sounds |
||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
'''Browser/screen resolution compatibility:''' |
'''Browser/screen resolution compatibility:''' |
||
*800 x 600, 1280 x 960 OK. Java required. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 05:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
'''Pros:''' |
'''Pros:''' |
||
| Line 142: | Line 143: | ||
'''Comments:''' |
'''Comments:''' |
||
*I don't agree with having sounds in the header. Firstly, our OggHandler doesn't make it obvious what those little grey buttons do. Firefox users would get a nasty hanging surprise when they click on them because OJI is teh suxxor (I'm not sure about the new interface). And besides, not everyone has Java (configured/enabled) for internet browsing. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 05:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
=== RyRy === |
=== RyRy === |
||
* [[Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/RyRy]] |
* [[Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/RyRy]] |
||
Revision as of 05:28, 19 July 2008
Based on the current page
These designs are similar to the current page, but with significant differences, such as content rearranged:
5theye
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
88wolfmaster
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Alexfusco5
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Aquillyne
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Artyom
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Blackhole77
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
CrazyChemGuy
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Hereford
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Significant borkage at 800 x 600: {{cent}} overlays portals and other areas, POTD looks whacked and dead space. MER-C 05:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Hereford (2)
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Horizontal scrolling at 800 x 600. MER-C 05:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Five Fifteen
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Onecanadasquarebishopsgate
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Significant horizontal scrolling at 800 x 600. MER-C 13:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
- Not that Similar to main pageElectrical Experiment 00:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- I find those color boxes look *really* tacky. TFA and OTD are surrounded by heaps of dead space at 1280 x 960, the dark blue blob should be centered and read less like a promotional. The bullets are indistinguishable against the blue background. MER-C 13:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Red Thunder
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- 800 x 600, 1280 x 960 OK. Java required. MER-C 05:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
- I don't agree with having sounds in the header. Firstly, our OggHandler doesn't make it obvious what those little grey buttons do. Firefox users would get a nasty hanging surprise when they click on them because OJI is teh suxxor (I'm not sure about the new interface). And besides, not everyone has Java (configured/enabled) for internet browsing. MER-C 05:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
RyRy
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
- I absolutely love how the DYK and ITN sections switched places! —Animum (talk) 00:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) I actually think DYK is more looked at then ITN, so a switch would make users and others look at them more. Seemed like a good idea for me. ;) -- RyRy (talk) 06:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Ryan
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Ryan Postlethwaite
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Scottydude
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Breaks with lots of dead space at 800 x 600. MER-C 05:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Scottydude (2)
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Same as Scottydude (1). MER-C 05:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
SusanLesch
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Search bar overlays user links ("my talk, my preferences, ...") and parts of the tabs at 800 x 600. It also is non-functional, but I suspect it is a placeholder. MER-C 05:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- MER-C, thanks for looking. Yes it's a placeholder. I don't see any support for tweaking static content or for moving search to the top. So count my blessings, they moved the search box up a section which was a great improvement. SusanLesch (talk) 23:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
SusanLesch 2
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Same as SusanLesch (1) above. MER-C 05:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Tlogmer
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Horizontal scrolling at 800 x 600, but no other borkage. MER-C 05:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
- Green text could be a problem for color blind people. MER-C 11:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments:
Wintran
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- 800 x 600, 1280 x 960 OK. MER-C 05:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
Comments:
Zrs 12
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- POTD borkage, horizontal scrolling at 800 x 600. MER-C 05:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons:
- POTD too small, caption takes up more space than the picture. Can be fixed by having the picture over the caption with increased resolution, but there may be problems with panoramas. MER-C 13:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments:
Xenus
Browser/screen resolution compatibility:
- Horizontal scrolling at 800 x 600, no other borkage. MER-C 05:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Pros:
Cons: