Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/USERNAME: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:05, 16 June 2014

Added section on desired outcome

I added a section to this template that's been on the "example user" template for some time. - brenneman 03:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editnotice

Added Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/USERNAME. Rd232 ^talk 13:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 16 June 2014

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected project page at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jotamar. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Statement of the dispute

My claim is stated below on the description. My disruptive conduct claim refers mainly to the Politics in Navarre section and the corresponding discussion section, but I add links to previous edits by this editor. Iñaki LL (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Desired outcome

Demand an explanation on unexplained reactive tags added to the section cited above
Give the reported editor a warning and enlighten him on the good practices
Block him temporarily from the article if that could be done

Description

The reported editor keeps raising objections of a POV nature in a string on Navarre, I have met him in previous edits where, like here, he shows reactive, inaccurate and unsupported responses and edits/tags I have to fix myself, no care really, and no real insight into the matter in question. He asked for 3o and got an adverse answer but that would not be enough, so kept making claims. (...) Really wasting my time.

Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Article Navarre, I provide diffs of Jotamar's relevant edits, not the edits of mine added in the same thread, that is what I understand I need to do here.

Article Navarre, a previous case

Article Treviño enclave dispute

Article Treviño exclave

Article Basque Country

Article Basque language

Applicable policies and guidelines

{List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Attempts by certifier User:Ugog Nizdast

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Navarre&diff=610531785&oldid=610512906

Attempts by certifier User:TransporterMan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Navarre.23Present-day_politics

Other attempts

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Other users who endorse this summary

{Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it. Discussion of this view or other people's endorsements belongs on the talk page, not in this section.}

Response

This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed. Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}

Users who endorse this summary:

RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it. Discussion of this view or comments made by people endorsing this view belong on the talk page, not in this section

Views

This section is for statements or opinions written by users not directly involved with this dispute, but who would like to add a view of the dispute. Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" or "Response") should not normally edit this section, except to endorse another person's view.

Outside view by ExampleUsername

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by ExampleUsername

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Reminder to use the talk page for discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

Iñaki LL (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Editnotice==
 Added [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/USERNAME]]. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 13:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
+== Protected edit request on 16 June 2014 ==
+{{edit protected|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jotamar|answered=no}}
+<!-- Begin request -->
+==Statement of the dispute==
+''My claim is stated below on the description. My disruptive conduct claim refers mainly to the [[Navarre#Politics|Politics in Navarre]] section and the corresponding [[Talk:Navarre#Present-day_politics|discussion section]], but I add links to previous edits by this editor.'' [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 22:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
+=== Desired outcome  ===
+* Demand an explanation on unexplained reactive tags added to the section cited above
+* Give the reported editor a warning and enlighten him on the good practices
+* Block him temporarily from the article if that could be done
+=== Description ===
+The reported editor keeps raising objections of a POV nature in a string on [[Navarre]], I have met him in previous edits where, like here, he shows reactive, inaccurate and unsupported responses and edits/tags I have to fix myself, no care really, and no real insight into the matter in question. He asked for 3o and got an adverse answer but that would not be enough, so kept making claims. (...) Really wasting my time.
+=== Evidence of disputed behavior ===
+(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
+Article [[Navarre]], I provide diffs of Jotamar's relevant edits, not the edits of mine added in the same thread, that is what I understand I need to do here.
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=611247542&oldid=610983358
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=608251862&oldid=603952068
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=609817917&oldid=609577502
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=610509734&oldid=610509528
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=610647162&oldid=610603363
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=610950947&oldid=610765139
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=610952350&oldid=610951648
+Article [[Navarre]], a previous case
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jotamar#Citation_needed_in_Navarre
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre&diff=510478043&oldid=510181628
+Article [[Treviño enclave dispute]]
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trevi%C3%B1o_enclave_dispute&diff=605753301&oldid=605753016
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trevi%C3%B1o_enclave_dispute&diff=605773875&oldid=605767087
+Article [[Treviño exclave]]
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trevi%C3%B1o_exclave&diff=605754401&oldid=605082216
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trevi%C3%B1o_exclave&diff=599448087&oldid=598168640
+Article [[Basque Country (autonomous community)|Basque Country]]
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_(autonomous_community)&diff=560222654&oldid=560020209
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_(autonomous_community)&diff=562747469&oldid=562731160
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_Country_(autonomous_community)&diff=562600669&oldid=561867383
+Article [[Basque language]]
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_language&diff=584870139&oldid=584522567
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basque_language&diff=584230290&oldid=582962649
+=== Applicable policies and guidelines ===
+{List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
+:#[[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]]
+:#[[Wikipedia:NOTFORUM#FORUM|WP is not a forum]]
+:#[[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]
+=== Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute ===
+(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Navarre#Present-day_politics
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Navarre.23Present-day_politics
+:#
+:#
+:#
+:#
+==== Attempts by certifier [[User:Ugog Nizdast]] ====
+<!-- Please replace "C1" with the username of the first certifier.-->
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Navarre&diff=610531785&oldid=610512906
+:#
+==== Attempts by certifier [[User:TransporterMan]] ====
+<!-- Please replace "C2" with the username of the second certifier.-->
+:#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Navarre.23Present-day_politics
+:#
+==== Other attempts ====
+:#
+:#
+=== Users certifying the basis for this dispute ===
+''{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}''
+<!-- Please note: If you did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, but agree with the summary's presentation of events, please sign in the next section. Remember to notify the subject, via his/her talk page, that a conduct dispute has been raised.-->
+:#
+:#
+=== Other users who endorse this summary ===
+<!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. -->
+''{Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.   RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.  Discussion of this view or other people's endorsements belongs on the talk page, not in this section.}''
+# <!-- Replace this with your signature -->
+#
+==Response==
+''This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed.  Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below.  Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.''
+{Add your summary here.  You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}
+===Users who endorse this summary:===
+''RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.  Discussion of this view or comments made by people endorsing this view belong on the talk page, not in this section''
+#
+==Views==
+''This section is for statements or opinions written by users not directly involved with this dispute, but who would like to add a view of the dispute.  Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it. '''All''' signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to [[Wikipedia talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this page's discussion page]].  Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" or "Response") should not normally edit this section, except to endorse another person's view.''
+===Outside view by ExampleUsername===
+{Add your summary here.  You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.  Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.  RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.}
+Users who endorse this summary:
+#
+===Outside view by ExampleUsername===
+{Add your summary here.  You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.  Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.  RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do not endorse a view indicates that you do not entirely agree with it.}
+Users who endorse this summary:
+#
+==Reminder to use the talk page for discussion==
+''All'' signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to [[Wikipedia talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this page's discussion page]]. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.<!--
+Do not comment below. Please read the instructions above.
+-->
+<!-- End request -->
+[[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 22:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)