Flying imams incident

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Flying Imams controversy)
Jump to: navigation, search

On November 20, 2006, 6:30pm, six Muslim imams were removed from US Airways Flight 300 to Phoenix, Arizona, at Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport, because several passengers and crew members became alarmed by what they felt was suspicious behavior.[1][2] The airline has stated that the captain delayed takeoff and called airport security workers to ask the imams to leave the plane; the men refused, and that the captain then called police. The plane left without the imams on board about three hours later. The imams were detained, questioned, and then released.

The imams, along with the Muslim American Society and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, have brought high-profile complaints and demonstrations against the airline, saying they were removed from the airplane solely due to religious discrimination. Investigations by the airline and police reported that the airline and ground crews responded to security concerns properly in removing the men from the plane.[3]

On July 24, 2009, U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery allowed a discrimination lawsuit filed by the imams to proceed, saying, "The right not to be arrested in the absence of probable cause is clearly established and, based on the allegations ... no reasonable officer could have believed that the arrest of the Plaintiffs was proper."[4]

Identities[edit]

The six imams were Didmar Faja, Mohamed Said Mitwaly Ibrahim, Marwan Sadeddin, Omar Shahin, Ahmad al-Shqeirat (also known as Amad Tafish Shqeirat), and Mahmoud Sulaiman. Ibrahim lives and works in Bakersfield, California, and the other five live and work in the Phoenix, Arizona area.

Alleged suspicious behavior[edit]

According to some passengers and flight staff, a number of whom didn't identify themselves, the suspicious behavior of the imams included the following:[5][6][7][8]

  • The imams refused to sit in their assigned seats. Instead, it is claimed that they fanned out in the cabin, sitting in pairs close to the front, middle, and rear exit rows.
  • Shahin and the two imams seated in Coach Row 9 requested seatbelt extensions (a strap with large metal buckles normally used by obese individuals to lengthen their seatbelts), even though flight staff say none seemed to need it. They then placed the extensions on the cabin floor in front of them, instead of attaching them to their seatbelts.
  • Three of the imams traveled without any checked baggage, and on one-way tickets.
  • According to a nearby passenger who spoke Arabic, the two imams sitting in the back of the plane, while speaking to each other in Arabic, mentioned Osama bin Laden and condemned America for "killing Saddam".

Shahin denied some of these observations in press reports (see "conflicting accounts" below).

Aftermath[edit]

The day following the incident, Shahin, the spokesperson for the group, spoke to the press that had gathered when he returned to a US Airways ticket counter to buy new tickets for the group. He told media that the incident was "humiliating, the worst moment of my life," and asked, "To practice your faith and pray is a crime in America?" When US Airways would not issue him and the other imams new tickets he called for a boycott of the airline, and said, "I'm not going to stay silent... I came to this country to enjoy justice and freedom".[9] He has said it is incorrect that any of the men had one-way tickets, and that he had alerted the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the conference in order to prevent this kind of incident from occurring.[10]

On November 27, Shahin and others, including Mahdi Bray (executive director of the Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation), Rabbi Arthur Waskow (of the Shalom Center of Philadelphia), Reverend Graylan Hagler (of the United Church of Christ), and Hillary Shelton (director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People-Washington National Office) held a "pray-in" consisting of a press statement, public prayer, and flight departure at a US Airways ticket counter at Reagan National Airport.[11]

Another protest, organized by the Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation, took place on December 1, 2006, in front of US Airways headquarters. The spokesman for the group said: "We want to tell US Airways that second-class citizenship is not an option." Other speakers at the gathering included a Jewish leader, a Catholic cleric, and a Presbyterian pastor who told the crowd that the "Imams did nothing to merit their exclusion from the flight". A spokesman for the Muslim American Society said that several of the affected imams did not attend the gathering because they are shy about publicity, and had been humiliated.[12]

One of the imams, al-Shqeirat, spiritual leader of the Islamic Community Center of Tempe, said in an interview that the imams were likely to file a discrimination lawsuit against US Airways, saying that "it was handled in an unprofessional way, and the decision (to remove them from the plane) was made by unprofessional people."[12]

Muslim Congressman-elect Keith Ellison, who gave a talk on "Imams and Politics"[13] at the meeting from which the flying imams were returning home, attempted to organize a meeting between US Airways executives, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, and other legislators and community members to discuss the incident.[14]

Investigations by the airline, the Air Carrier Security Committee of the Air Line Pilots Association, and the Department of Homeland Security supported the actions of the airline and found no evidence that the men were removed from the airline due to religious discrimination because they were "merely praying," but rather for security reasons. A US Airways spokesperson said, "We've done what we typically do in a situation where there is a removal or some kind of customer service at issue.... We talked with crew members and passengers and those on the ground.... We found out the facts are substantially the same, and the imams were detained because of the concerns crew members had based on the behavior they observed, and from reports by the customers.... We're looking at it as a security issue and as a customer-service issue and where we might need to do outreach." A meeting between the six imams and the airline as part of the investigation was canceled at the imam's request.[3]

The imams retained the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as their legal counsel.[3] Nihad Awad, executive director of CAIR, sent a letter to the airline seeking a settlement agreement and said, "otherwise, the group is prepared to go to court.” Awad told CNN, “This is very important. Otherwise we have no guarantees such incidents with US Airways and other airlines would not happen again.” No information about the amount of damages sought was given.[15]

On October 27, 2009, the "flying imams" and the air carrier settled out of court for an unknown amount.

Lawsuit[edit]

On March 12, 2007, the imams' lawyer, Omar Mohammedi, filed a lawsuit on their behalf for unspecified damages, citing "fear, depression, mental pain and financial injury" on the part of the imams.[16] The lawsuit targeted US Airways and the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, along with several unnamed passengers on the flight, who had reported on the imams' behavior to the flight crew, referred to as "John Does" in the lawsuit. The decision to include passengers among the targets of the lawsuit was a controversial one, with some legal experts saying it could have a "chilling effect" on airline security.[17] The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, filed a brief on behalf of the passengers, and called this aspect of the lawsuit "legal terrorism".[18]

As a result of the lawsuit, on March 22, 2007, U.S. Representative Steve Pearce introduced the "Protecting Americans Fighting Terrorism Act of 2007" into the United States Congress, a bill that would have outlawed the suing of airline passengers who report on suspicious activity. On March 27, the bill was scrapped, and the wording instead placed into the Rail and Public Transportation Security Act of 2007, through an amendment sponsored by Representative Peter T. King.[19] At the same time, the imams amended their lawsuit to sue only those "John Does" who had acted "with the intent to discriminate".[20] On July 19, this portion was removed from the bill when the bill's final wording was drafted by a House and Senate conference committee.[21] The Associated Press reported, however, that in late July 2007 "lawmakers in Congress reached a deal on a homeland security bill to include language, crafted in response to the imams case, that would give immunity from lawsuits to people who report suspicious behavior. The bill passed the House and Senate."[22]

On August 1, 2007, the imams' attorney Frederick Goetz announced a motion to amend the complaint to include the names of the individuals responsible for the imams' removal had been entered.[22] The list of names included employees of the airline and police officers, but not passengers.[22] Goetz said "We've identified the people we think are responsible", and said that their amending the complaint had "absolutely nothing to do" with the bill in Congress.[23]

Conflicting accounts[edit]

Shahin denied allegation of suspicious behavior,[24] and said everyone in the group had round-trip tickets and that he has the documentation to prove it, that he asked for a seatbelt extension because he weighs 290 pounds (130 kg), and that the group conducted their sunset-time prayers in a quiet manner.

The police report shows the imams sitting in seats 1B, 9C, 9D, 21B, 25D, and 25E.[25] Regarding the claim that the imams did not sit in their assigned seats, Shahin said that only one imam, Sadeddin, switched seats. Sadeddin, who is blind and claimed to need assistance, convinced a coach passenger to exchange seats so that he could sit next to Sulaiman[26] in Row 9. Explaining his seat in first class, Shahin said that he is a frequent flyer and had received an Elite Member upgrade to first class.[26]

Conflicting accounts about the use of handcuffs put that aspect of the controversy into question. On November 21, 2006, Shahin told the Associated Press, "Six scholars in handcuffs. It's terrible."[27] Amy Goodman reports a similar statement made on November 29.[26] However, on December 1 The Washington Times stated: "Mr. Shahin says they were not led off the plane in handcuffs, as reported, nor were they kept in handcuffs during their five-hour detention, and they were not harassed by dogs."[28] However, a Washington Times editorial on December 2 claimed that Shahin had stated that the imams were already handcuffed when they were taken off the plane.[29] To add to the confusion, a passenger told a group of news reporters a few hours later that "apparently they [the imams] were all in handcuffs by the end" of their time on the airplane, though it appears that she did not observe this directly.[30]

The Washington Times reported that, according to Shahin, the US Airways refused to sell the imams a plane ticket, despite the intervention of an FBI agent who tried to persuade the airline in favor of the imams. FBI spokesman Paul McCabe disputes that an agent talked to US Airways on behalf of the imams.[28]

Criticism of US Airways[edit]

The group had initially attracted attention by praying loudly in the departure lounge before boarding the plane. Spokespersons for Muslim advocacy organizations the Muslim American Society and CAIR argued that rather than doing anything suspicious, all the men did was pray, and that the removal from the plane represented religious profiling. CAIR's Arizona chapter spokesperson said that "All these men did was pray, and it was misunderstood. The bottom line is that they were Middle Eastern-looking men ... and that scares some people," and, "We are concerned that crewmembers, passengers and security personnel may have succumbed to fear and prejudice based on stereotyping of Muslims and Islam."

Criticism of the imams[edit]

An editorial in Investor's Business Daily questioned whether the imams were "victims or provocateurs", and suggested that it is possible the incident was planned in advance to gain publicity for planned congressional legislation against profiling.[31] The Muslim American Society also backed this legislation expected to be introduced by Representative John Conyers of Detroit.[32] Denouncing "the provocative agenda of these imams," Debra Burlingame opined that "it is nothing short of obscene that these six religious leaders (…) chose to turn that airport into a stage and that airplane into a prop in the service of their need for grievance theater."[33]

A former federal air marshal expressed the fear that the situation "will make crews and passengers in the future second-guess reporting these events, thus compromising the aircraft's security out of fear of being labeled a dogmatist or a bigot, or being sued," and that "Instilling politically correct fears into the minds of airline passengers is nothing less than psychological terrorism." [34]

Steven Emerson accused the Islamic Center of Tucson, a mosque where Shahin served as president, of having "an extensive history of terror links."[35]

Critics also noted Shahin's prior involvement with a similar case. Two Arizona college students and members of Shahin's mosque, Muhammed al-Qudhaieen and Hamdan al-Shalawi, were removed from an America West flight after making two attempts to open the cockpit. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the FBI suspected this was a dry run for the 9/11 hijackings. The students filed racial-profiling lawsuits against America West, now part of US Airways, with Shahin as their defense attorney[36]

After the out-of-court settlement was announced in 2009, a USA Today editorial called the imams' lawsuit "troubling", and stated that the lawsuit's conclusion could lead "others to act out in hopes of cashing in", and might prevent "passengers from speaking up, or airline crews from acting, when they have reasonable suspicions."[37]

Media treatments[edit]

This controversy was the subject of a segment of talk show host Jerry Klein's radio show. During the show Mr. Klein purposely pretended to support forcing American Muslims to wear "identifying markers" such as armbands or tattoos (as Nazi Germany did to Jews before and during World War II) to provoke listener reactions (see Jerry Klein's 2006 radio experiment).

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "6 Imams Removed From Flight for Behavior Deemed Suspicious" The New York Times November 22, 2006
  2. ^ "About Those Imams", Richard Miniter, New York Post, December 2, 2006
  3. ^ a b c Probes dismiss imams' racism claim
  4. ^ Judge clears way for lawsuit by 6 imams arrested at Mpls. airport
  5. ^ "6 Muslim clerics removed from airliner urge boycott" The Seattle Times November 22, 2006
  6. ^ "How the imams terrorized an airliner" The Washington Times November 28, 2006
  7. ^ "Imams Stage Airport 'Pray-In' As Protest", ABC News, November 28, 2006
  8. ^ [1]
  9. ^ Uproar follows imams' detention
  10. ^ Flying while Muslim
  11. ^ Imam Barred From US Airways Flight Joins Interfaith Clerics and NAACP Leader for Press Conference, Prayer, and Flight on US Airways;MAS Freedom Conducts Airport 'Pray-in' and Press Conference
  12. ^ a b Muslims, others protest:US Airways' removal of imams from flight called offensive
  13. ^ North American Imams Federation conference booklet
  14. ^ Ellison seeks meeting on removal of clerics
  15. ^ "Imams seek settlement with US Airways over removal from flight". CNN. December 11, 2006. Retrieved on Jan. 27, 2007
  16. ^ The real target of the 6 imams' 'discrimination' suit, Katherine Kersten, Minneapolis Star Tribune, March 14, 2007
  17. ^ Imams' suit risks 'chill' on security, Audrey Hudson, The Washington Times, March 24, 2007
  18. ^ Hill bill protects flying public, Audrey Hudson, The Washington Times, March 24, 2007
  19. ^ Thompson, Bennie G.. "H.R. 1401, Rail and Public Transportation Security Act of 2007". THOMAS. Library of Congress. Retrieved April 14, 2007. 
  20. ^ Imams narrow target of 'Does', Audrey Hudson, The Washington Times, March 31, 2007
  21. ^ Tipster shields lifted by Democrats, Audrey Hudson, The Washington Times, July 20, 2007
  22. ^ a b c "Imams won't sue airline passengers for removal". Associated Press. August 1, 2007. 
  23. ^ Gregg Aamot (August 1, 2007). "Imams drop passengers from lawsuit over removal from flight". Associated Press. 
  24. ^ Flying while Muslim MSNBC.com
  25. ^ "Offense/Incident/Arrest Report" (PDF). November 20, 2006.  Retrieved on Dec. 19, 2006
  26. ^ a b c "High-Flying Profiling: Six Muslim Leaders Removed in Handcuffs From US Airways Plane After Praying in Airport". Democracy Now. November 29, 2006.  Retrieved on Dec. 11, 2006
  27. ^ Steve Karnowski (November 21, 2006). "6 Imams Removed From Twin Cities Flight". Associated Press.  Retrieved on Dec. 11, 2006
  28. ^ a b Audrey Hudson (December 1, 2006). "Imam disputes tie to Hamas". The Washington Times. 
  29. ^ "Nobles and knaves", The Washington Times, December 2, 2006
  30. ^ "US Airways passengers talk about the removal", CNN.com, November 21, 2006 (video – click on link in the left sidebar)
  31. ^ A profiling in courage, Investor's Business Daily, November 22, 2006.
  32. ^ MAS Freedom Foundation Leads Powerful Interfaith Response to Air Travel Profiling
  33. ^ On a Wing and a Prayer (Grievance theater at Minneapolis International Airport) by Debra Burlingame, The Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2006.
  34. ^ Marshals decry imams' charges
  35. ^ "Suspicion about imams grows as terror links pile up", Star Tribune, December 10, 2006
  36. ^ A profiling in courage, Investor's Business Daily, November 22, 2006.]
  37. ^ Our view on post-9/11 travel: ‘Flying imams’ settlement carries costs for air safety, USA Today, October 26, 2009