Jump to content

Indigenous Voice to Parliament

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mitch Ames (talk | contribs) at 00:00, 1 December 2022 (→‎Anthony Albanese: no need for italics in quotes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Indigenous Voice to Parliament (The Voice) is the proposed new advisory group containing separately elected Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, perpetually enshrined in the Constitution of Australia, which would "have a responsibility and right to advise the Australian Parliament and Government on national matters of significance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples".

The request for creating the Indigenous Voice to Parliament was a result of the May 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart, delivered by the First Nations National Constitutional Convention which met at Uluru. This request was refused by the Turnbull government, on the grounds that it would be "would be seen as third chamber of parliament".[1] After Scott Morrison became prime minister of Australia in August 2018, his government proposed the Indigenous voice to government in October 2019, which would introduce a body via legislation, without changing the Constitution. The process by which the channel would be established was known as the Indigenous voice co-design process. The Senior Advisory Group was set up under Minister for Indigenous Australians, Ken Wyatt.

With a change of government on 23 May 2022, new prime minister Anthony Albanese promised in his victory speech that a referendum to decide the Indigenous Voice to Parliament enshrined in the Constitution would be held within his term of office. In July 2022 he outlined further plans regarding the referendum, and proposed that the advisory group be named the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. As of November 2022, the details of what the Indigenous Voice to Parliament involves have not been confirmed. The new process is being overseen by Labor's Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney. Whilst the Peter Dutton-led Opposition Liberal Party has thus far reserved its position on the referendum pending further details from the Labor Government on the nature of the proposed Voice, their junior Coalition partner Nationals have declared themselves against the proposal, with their Aboriginal Senator for the Northern Territory Jacinta Price arguing that it will enshrine a racially divisive bureaucracy into the Constitution, that cannot be dismantled.

Background

Indigenous Australians in Parliament

The rights of indigenous Australians to vote and stand for Parliament faced uneven restrictions across state and federal jurisdictions up until the 1960s. By the election of the second Menzies Government in 1949, indigenous people were still excluded from voting in Federal Elections in Queensland and Western Australia because of state legislation. Between 1949 and 1962, Menzies dismantled remaining restrictions on Federal voting rights, commencing with Aboriginal ex-servicemen in 1949, and concluding with the 1962 Commonwealth Electoral Act, which granted all indigenous people the option to enrol and vote in federal elections. Queensland became the last state to remove restrictions on state voting in 1965[2][3][4] The first Aboriginal parliamentarians began to emerge at a state level from 1969 and, in 1971, Liberal Neville Bonner entered the Senate, as the first Aboriginal Federal Parliamentarian.[5] Indigenous representation in Australian State and Federal Parliaments has grown markedly in the 21st century. In 2010, Liberal Ken Wyatt became the first Aboriginal member of the House of Representatives. In 2019, he became the first Aboriginal Cabinet Minister. In 2013, Northern Territory Chief Minister Adam Giles of the Country Liberal Party became the first Aboriginal to lead an Australian State or Territory. The 2022 Australian federal election resulted in a record 11 Aboriginal parliamentarians, representing 4.8% of all parliamentarians, which higher than the Indigenous Australian population of 3.3%.[6]

Elected voices to Parliament

The National Aboriginal Consultative Committee was created in 1973 by the Whitlam government with a principal function to advise the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and the Minister on issues of concern to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Its members were elected by Indigenous people.[7] In 1977, the Fraser government reconstituted it as the National Aboriginal Congress.[8] This body was abolished by the Hawke government in 1985.[9]

ATSIC was the next elected body that provided an Indigenous voice to government. It was established by the Hawke government on 5 March 1990 through the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989. It was abolished by the Howard government with the support of the Beazley Labor opposition on 24 March 2005, under a cloud of corruption. Prime Minister Howard and Indigenous Affairs Minister Amanda Vanstone announced in 2004: "We believe very strongly that the experiment in separate representation, elected representation, for indigenous people has been a failure," and proposed to establish an consultation model based on appointment of "distinguished indigenous people to advise the Government on a purely advisory basis".[10] This body was established as the National Indigenous Council (NIC) in November that year.

A government inquiry into the demise of ATSIC recommended in March 2005 that the government appointed NIC "be a temporary body, to exist only until a proper national, elected representative body is in place".[11] The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner specifically called for a more representative voice in the Australian Human Rights Commission's Social Justice Reports of 2006 and 2008.[12]

In early 2008, the NIC was disbanded, and in December that year, the Rudd government asked the Human Rights Commission to develop a new elected Indigenous representative body.[13] This was announced as the National Congress of Australia's First Peoples in November 2009.[14] The Congress was established as a body independent of government, aiming to avoid the problems ATSIC had.[15] The Abbott government cut off its main funding stream in 2013. It went into voluntary administration in June 2019,[16] before ceasing completely in October 2019.[17]

Calls for a new voice came from the Cape York Institute in 2012 and 2015.[12] The institute's Noel Pearson formulated the need and rationale for constitutional recognition in his 2014 contribution "A Rightful Place: Race, Recognition and a More Complete Commonwealth" for Quarterly Essay.[18]

Indigenous Australians in the Constitution

See also: Constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians

Since 1967, the Australian Constitution grants the Federal Government powers to make laws for indigenous Australians. The Liberal Holt Government called a referendum in 1967 Referendum to "omit certain words relating to the people of the Aboriginal race in any State and so that Aboriginals are to be counted in reckoning the Population". Over 90% of Australians voted 'yes' in the referendum, and from that time forward, indigenous people were automatically counted in the census.[19][20]

Following the 1998 Australian Constitutional Convention, the Howard Government sought to have reference to Indigenous Australians included in a new Preamble to the Constitution. The proposed preamble included the words: "We the Australian people commit ourselves to [...] honouring Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, the nation's first people, for their deep kinship with their lands and for their ancient and continuing cultures which enrich the life of our country", however the preamble was rejected in a 1999 referendum.

On 16 October 2007, Prime Minister John Howard promised to hold a referendum on constitutional recognition, and then Labor leader Kevin Rudd gave bipartisan support.

On 8 November 2010 Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced plans for a referendum on the issue.[21] At this time, the Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians was formed to determine how best to do this. In January 2012, the panel released their final report, which did not recommend the establishment of a new representative body.[22]

The Abbott Government committed itself to pursuing recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution.[23] In November 2012, the all-party Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples was announced, and first met in 2014. It was chaired by Liberal MP Ken Wyatt. It's "Final Report" of June 2015 noted Noel Person's and others' requests for stronger forms of Indigenous representation, however did not recommend that a new body for this purpose be created.[24][25]

Abbott said he hoped the wording for a referendum could be concluded in 2016, for a referendum vote in 2017.[26] The referendum was not implemented by the successor Turnbull Government, and debate shifted towards formation of a constitutionally recognised advisory body.

A constitutional voice to Parliament

An Indigenous Voice

On 7 December 2015 a 16-member Referendum Council was appointed by Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and the ALP's Bill Shorten.[27] In October 2016, the Council released the "Discussion Paper on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples" which included a call for "An Indigenous voice".[28] The Council then met with over 1,200 people. This lead to the First Nations National Constitutional Convention on 26 May 2017, whose delegates collectively composed the Uluru Statement from the Heart. This statement included the request, "We call for the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution."[29]

On 13 June 2017, the Referendum Council released their "Final Report". This included the recommendation "That a referendum be held to provide in the Australian Constitution for a representative body that gives Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander First Nations a Voice to the Commonwealth Parliament. One of the specific functions of such a body, to be set out in legislation outside the Constitution, should include the function of monitoring the use of the heads of power in section 51(xxvi) and section 122. The body will recognise the status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first peoples of Australia."[30]

In response to this, the federal government established the Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in March 2018.[31] It was tasked with reviewing the findings of the Uluru Statement delegates, Referendum Council and the two earlier constitutional recommendation bodies. The committee published it's "Final Report" in November 2018, including four recommendations. The first of which was: "In order to achieve a design for The Voice that best suits the needs and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, the Committee recommends that the Australian government initiate a process of co-design with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples".[32]

The Select Committee stated in the report that the delegates at the 2017 Convention "understood that the primary purpose of The Voice was to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices were heard whenever the Commonwealth Parliament exercised its powers to make laws under section 51(xxvi) and section 122 of the Constitution."[33] That is, laws made specifically regarding Australian Indigenous people; or for the Northern Territory, which has a high proportion of Indigenous people.

Co-design of the Voice

Ken Wyatt

On 30 October 2019, Ken Wyatt AM, Minister for Indigenous Australians in the Morrison government, announced the commencement of a "co-design process" aimed at providing an Indigenous voice to government. The Senior Advisory Group (SAG) was co-chaired by Professor Tom Calma AO, chancellor of the University of Canberra, and Professor Dr Marcia Langton, associate provost at the University of Melbourne, and was to comprise a total of 20 leaders and experts from across the country.[34] There was some scepticism about the process from the beginning, with the criticism that it did not honour the Uluru Statement from the Heart's plea to "walk with us in a movement of the Australian people for a better future".[35] According to Michelle Grattan, "...it is notable that it is calling it a 'voice to government' rather than a 'voice to parliament' ". Prime Minister Scott Morrison rejected the proposal in the Uluru Statement for a voice to parliament to be put into the Australian Constitution; instead, the voice will be enshrined in legislation. The government also said it would run a referendum during its present term about recognising Indigenous people in the Constitution "should a consensus be reached and should it be likely to succeed".[36]

The models for the voice were planned to be developed in two stages:[36]

  1. First, two groups, one local and regional and the other a national group, will create models aimed at improving local and regional decision-making, and identifying how best federal government can record Indigenous peoples' views and ideas. The groups consist mainly of Indigenous members.
  2. Consultations will be held with Indigenous leaders, communities and stakeholders to refine the models developed in the first stage.

Wyatt said that he doesn't mind what models are used, and they may vary across the country. His prime targets are suicide prevention and Closing the Gap. A meeting with Prime Minister Scott Morrison, senior ministers and peak Aboriginal community representatives had agreed on "priority reforms", which included greater Aboriginal involvement in decision-making and service delivery at all levels, and a commitment to ensuring that "all mainstream government agencies and institutions undertake systemic and structural transformation to contribute to closing the gap". Wyatt said that he would need to manage expectations on all sides as he seeks to build a consensus on the matter.[37]

Three groups

The original other members of the Senior Advisory Group (SAG) (besides Langton and Calma) included, among others, Frank Brennan, Josephine Cashman, Mick Gooda, Chris Kenny, Vonda Malone, June Oscar, Noel Pearson, Pat Turner, and Galarrwuy Yunupingu.[38][39] The first meeting of the group was held in Canberra on 13 November 2019.[40] It was planned that the SAG would propose models for the voice by June 2020.[37] Cashman was dismissed from the SAG on 28 January 2020 after her involvement with commentator Andrew Bolt in denouncing the Aboriginal identity of author Bruce Pascoe.[41][42][43]

The National Co-design Group was announced on 15 January 2020, to be co-chaired by Donna Odegaard AM and Ray Griggs AO, CSC. The other 15 members include Fred Chaney AO, Joseph Elu AO, Jeff Kennett AC, Fiona McLeod AO, SC, and Gracelyn Smallwood AM.[44]

On 4 March 2020 the third tier, the Local and Regional Co-Design Group, was announced, to be co-chaired by Peter Buckskin and National Indigenous Australians Agency senior official Letitia Hope. Members included Dr Getano Lui (Jnr), Albert McNamara, Aden Ridgeway and Marion Scrymgour.[45][46] The group met for the first time in Sydney on 19 March 2020.[47]

2021 SAG reports

An interim report by the Senior Advisory Group led by Langton and Calma was delivered to the government in November 2020,[48] and officially published on 9 January 2021. It included proposals that the government would be obliged to consult the Voice whenever it was going to create new legislation relating to race, native title or racial discrimination, where it would affect Indigenous Australians. However, the Voice would not be able to veto the enactment of such laws, or change government policies. The Voice would comprise either 16 or 18 members, who would either be elected either directly or come from the regional and local voice bodies.[49] On the same day, Wyatt announced a second stage of co-design meetings lasting four months, involving more consultation with Indigenous people.[50]

Calma reported in March 2021 that about 25 to 35 regional groups would be created, with a mechanism for individuals to pass ideas up the chain from local to regional.[51]

In July 2021 the Indigenous Voice Co-design Process panel released its final report.[52][53] It proposed that the Voice would "have a responsibility and right to advise the Australian Parliament and Government on national matters of significance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples".[54] It provided detailed proposals on how both a "National Voice" and "Local & Regional Voices" would operate. The report did not cover changing the Constitution (and therefore requiring a referendum), as this was outside its terms of reference.[55] In November it was announced that the report would be considered in parliament as soon as possible; however, sitting time was very limited before the summer break.[56]

Anthony Albanese

In the 2022 Australian federal election in May, a Labor government was elected, with Anthony Albanese to serve as prime minister of Australia. In his victory speech, Albanese said that a referendum to decide the Indigenous Voice to Parliament would be held within his term of office. Incoming Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney would be overseeing the process, and she has said that there would need to be a far-reaching public education campaign to explain the voice to the Australian public before a referendum could be held. At that time (May 2022), it was still not clear exactly what a voice to parliament would look like; there were still differing views within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities about the proposal; and questions about whether an advisory body without the power of veto over parliament was ambitious enough.[57]

At the Garma Festival of Traditional Cultures in July, Albanese spoke in more detail of the government's plans for a voice to parliament. He proposed to add the following three lines to the Constitution:

  1. There shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.
  2. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to Parliament and the Executive Government on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.
  3. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to the composition, functions, powers and procedures of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.[58][59][60]

The wording of the second line contrasts with the wider advice function scope in Langton's and Calma's report.[61]

He also proposed that the actioning referendum ask the following question:

Do you support an alteration to the Constitution that establishes an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice?[58]

It has been pointed out that the relevant Referendum (Machinery Provision) Act[62] requires a more convoluted ballot wording and does not allow Albanese's simple phrasing.[63]

Referendum preparation

The first meetings of the Referendum Working Group (RWG) and the Referendum Engagement Group (REG) were held in Canberra on 29 September 2022. The RWG, co-chaired by minister Linda Burney and special envoy Patrick Dodson, includes a broad cross-section of representatives from First Nations communities across Australia. They will provide advice to the Government on how best to ensure a successful Referendum and focus on the key questions that need to be considered in the coming months, including:[64]

  • The timing to conduct a successful referendum
  • Refining the proposed constitutional amendment and question
  • The information on the Voice necessary for a successful referendum

The RWG includes Ken Wyatt, Tom Calma, Marcia Langton, Megan Davis, Jackie Huggins, Noel Pearson, Pat Turner, Galarrwuy Yunupingu, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner June Oscar, and a number of other respected leaders and community members. The REG includes those on the RWG as well as other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representatives from across the country, including land councils, local governments and community-controlled organisations. Mick Gooda, Kado Muir, and Hannah McGlade are included in this larger group. They will provide advice about building community understanding, awareness and support for the referendum.[64]

From the Heart campaign

"From the Heart" is a campaign of the Cape York Institute designed to increase awareness and understanding of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and a constitutionally-enshrined voice to parliament, and to show that it is a fair and practical reform.[65] Torres Strait Islander man Thomas Mayor, advocate for the Uluru Statement and the Voice, delivered the 2022 Vincent Lingiari Memorial Lecture on the topic. He drew parallels between Vincent Lingiari's struggle to be heard by governments back then, leading to the Wave Hill walk-off (Gurdindji strike), to what Indigenous peoples of Australia are experiencing today.[66]

In April 2022, From the Heart suggested two dates for a referendum to decide whether to enshrine a voice to parliament in the Constitution: 27 May 2023 or 27 January 2024.[67]

A new education campaign led by led by Roy Ah-See, called "History is Calling", was launched in early May 2022, to encourage Australians to answer the Uluru Dialogue's 2017 invitation, and to support the constitutionally-enshrined voice.[67] In September 2022, From the Heart released a video ad to promote a yes vote for the Voice in a referendum, as part of the "History is Calling" campaign.[68]

Opposition to the Voice proposal

Indigenous Senator Jacinta Price

Opposition to the proposal has been voiced from within both non-indigenous and indigenous communities, and from within both conservative and progressivist circles.

The Coalition

While the Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's Liberal Party is yet to declare a position (pending further detail from the Albanese Government on the nature of the proposal) their junior Coalition partner the Nationals have declared themselves against the proposal. Nationals leader David Littleproud announced on 28 November 2022 that "as the men and women who represent regional, rural and Indigenous and remote Australians ... we don't believe this will genuinely close the gap...", saying the party instead believed in "empowering local Indigenous communities... to give those communities the opportunities that those in metropolitan Australia enjoy every day". In supporting her leader's announcement, Aboriginal Senator for the Northern Territory Jacinta Price said that "What we need now is practical measures and we have to stop dividing our nation along the lines of race."[69]

Senator Price, along with former Liberal Senate candidate Warren Mundine have been among the leading Aboriginal voices against the Uluru Statement and Albanese Government Voice proposal, arguing that it does not represent indigenous consensus, and that it will only create a new layer of bureaucratic management and interference by elites over the lives of indigenous people and communities, while overturning the principle of equal rights for all races under Australian law. In a 2022 book entitled Beyond Belief… Rethinking the Voice to Parliament, Senator Price wrote: "The globally unprecedented Voice proposal will divide Australia along racial lines... It will constitutionally enshrine the idea that Aboriginal people are perpetual victims - forever in need of special measures." Mundine wrote for the same publication: "The Voice sounds to me like more bureaucracy controlling Indigenous lives and bossing us around."[70]

Former National Party leader Barnaby Joyce told Sky News Australia that the Voice to Parliament would do "real harm by dividing" the Australian population by race; that it would give unequal representation for "one group of people" due only to race, thus creating a divide in the population.[71]

Whilst the constitutionally conservative John Howard and Tony Abbott Liberal-National Governments actively supported inserting recognition of indigenous Australians into the Constitution, both leaders have rejected the idea of creating a Constitutionally enshrined "Voice" to Parliament. Whilst in office, their successor Turnbull and Morrison Coalition governments also rejected the Voice proposal. In 2017, Turnbull declared in a joint statement with Attorney General George Brandis and Indigenous Affairs Minister Nigel Scullion that it "would inevitably become seen as a third chamber of parliament" and that "the Referendum Council provided no guidance as to how this new representative assembly would be elected or how the diversity of Indigenous circumstance and experience could be fairly or democratically represented,” the statement said. Moreover, the government does not believe such a radical change to our constitution's representative institutions has any realistic prospect of being supported by a majority of Australians in a majority of states.[1] (Turnbull reversed his opposition to the proposal following the election of the Albanese Government).

In November 2022, John Howard told The Australian newspaper that "people saw the 1967 referendum as a demonstration of our good faith. But people see the voice as creating potential divisions."[72] Tony Abbott wrote for the same publication that he objected to the Voice proposal because it was "race based", would "vastly complicate" the difficulties of getting legislation passed and anything done; was a "vague-yet-portentous concept" that would invite High Court review and delay; and that ultimately, the cause of Reconciliation would be set back if the referendum fails, and that this was likely given the lack of bipartisan support as indicated by "new Coalition senator for the Northern Territory, the proud “Celtic-Warlpiri Australian” woman Jacinta Price, [expressing] deep scepticism about a proposal with so much of the detail thus far omitted, with so much potential for ineffective posturing, and that defines people by racial heritage."[73]

Minor parties

Among the minor parties on Left and Right, Australian Greens Senator Lidia Thorpe has described the Voice to Parliament referendum as a "waste of money", and said that it would be better to divert the funds into Indigenous communities, though Greens Leader Adam Bandt had dismissed her concerns, and supports the Voice.[74] Thorpe has also said that a "treaty" with indigenous Australians should come first – not the Voice.[75] Pauline Hanson's One Nation[76] and the National Party of Australia[77] oppose the Voice as parties.

Public opinion

Research commissioned by From the Heart and conducted by the C|T Group in June 2020 shows that a majority of Australians support a constitutionally-enshrined voice to parliament, and that this support has increased 7 percent in three months, from 49 percent in March to 56 percent in June 2020. There were 2000 participants in the survey, who were asked, "If a referendum were held today, how would you vote on the proposal to change the Constitution to set up a new body comprising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that gives advice to federal parliament on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander issues?". Only 17 percent said they would vote no, down 3 percent since March 2020.[78][79]

The ABC's Vote Compass survey has included questions about a voice to parliament in both its 2019 and 2022 editions. In 2019, 64% of voters agreed with the establishment of a voice while 22% disagreed. Of these, 37% strongly agreed, 27% somewhat agreed, 13% were neutral, 10% somewhat disagreed, and 12% strongly disagreed. The 2022 edition of Vote Compass found that support had grown to 73% while opposition declined to 16%: 48% strongly agreed, 25% somewhat agreed, 10% were neutral, 7% somewhat disagreed, and 9% strongly disagreed.[80]

In August 2022, former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull stated that despite his previous concerns, he would now vote in favour of Albanese's proposal.[81]

Graphical summary (2017-2022)
Public opinion polls on establishing an Indigenous Voice to Parliament
Date Firm Sample Support Oppose Undecided
September 2022 Resolve Strategic[82] 3618 64% 36% —
August 2022 JWS Research[83] 1000 47% 24% 29%[a]
August 2022 Essential[84] 1075 65% 35% —
July 2022 Australia Institute[85] 1000 65% 14% 21%
June 2022 Australia Institute[86] 1000 58% 16% 26%
July 2021 Essential[87] 1099 66% 19% 15%
July 2020 CT Group[88] 2000 56% 17% 27%
February 2020 CT Group[89] 2000 49% 20% 31%
July 2019 Essential[90] 1097 70% 18% 12%
June 2019 Essential[91] 1079 66% 21% 13%
February 2018 Essential[92] 1028 68% 21% 11%
November 2017 Essential[93] 1025 45% 16% 39%[b]
June 2017 Essential[94] 1013 44% 14% 42%[c]
Notes
  1. ^ Includes 23 per cent of neutral responses on top of 6 per cent of undecided responses.
  2. ^ Includes 28 per cent of neutral responses on top of 11 per cent of undecided responses.
  3. ^ Includes 27 per cent of neutral responses on top of 14 per cent of undecided responses.

State and Territory voices

ACT Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elected Body

The ACT Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elected Body (ATSIEB) was established in 2008.[95]

First People's Assembly of Victoria

In November 2019, the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria was first elected, consisting of 21 members representing Aboriginal Victorians, elected from five different regions in the state, and 10 members to represent each of the state's formally recognised traditional owner corporations (excluding the Yorta Yorta Nation Aboriginal Corporation, who declined to participate in the election process).[96] This body provides an Indigenous voice to the Victorian parliament.

South Australian voice to parliament

In May 2021, South Australian Premier Steven Marshall announced his government's intention to create the state's first Indigenous Voice to Parliament.[97] After the election of a state Labor government in 2022, new premier Peter Malinauskas pledged to implement this state-based voice to parliament, as well as restarting treaty talks and greater investment in areas affecting Aboriginal people in the state.[98] In July 2022 Dale Agius was appointed as the state's first Commissioner for First Nations Voice, with the role commencing in August and responsible for liaising with federal government. Kokatha elder Dr Roger Thomas would continue as Commissioner for Aboriginal Engagement for a further six months.[99]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Indigenous voice proposal 'not desirable', says Turnbull; The Guardian; 26 Oct 2017
  2. ^ Indigenous Australians’ right to vote; NMA, online 19 Nov 2022
  3. ^ "Electoral Milestone: Timetable for Indigenous Australians". Australian Electoral Commission. Archived from the original on 6 January 2008.
  4. ^ "History of the Indigenous Vote". Australian Electoral Commission. August 2006. Archived from the original on 17 February 2011.
  5. ^ Indigenous parliamentarians, federal and state: a quick guide; apt
  6. ^ The 47th parliament is the most diverse ever – but still doesn’t reflect Australia; The Guardian; 25 July
  7. ^ Quentin, Beresford (2007). Rob Riley : an aboriginal leader's quest for justice. Aboriginal Studies Press. ISBN 978-0-85575-502-7. OCLC 220246007.
  8. ^ "History of National Representative Bodies | National Congress of Australia's First Peoples". web.archive.org. 14 April 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  9. ^ Levin, Michael D. (31 December 1993), "Chapter 9. Ethnicity and Aboriginality: Conclusions", Ethnicity and Aboriginality, University of Toronto Press, pp. 168–180, doi:10.3138/9781442623187-012, ISBN 9781442623187, retrieved 5 January 2022
  10. ^ The end of ATSIC and the future administration of Indigenous affairs; apt.gov.au
  11. ^ Parliament of Australia. Select Committee on the Administration of Indigenous Affairs (March 2005). "Chapter 4: Representation". After ATSIC: Life in the mainstream?. Commonwealth of Australia. ISBN 0-642-71501-7.
  12. ^ a b "The Process". Indigenous Voice. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  13. ^ "Our Future in Our Hands - Community Guide | Australian Human Rights Commission". humanrights.gov.au. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  14. ^ "2009 Media Release: New National Congress of Australia's First Peoples announced". humanrights.gov.au. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  15. ^ "Readings 15:National Congress of Australia's First Peoples: Working with Indigenous Australians". www.workingwithindigenousaustralians.info. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  16. ^ "Australia's largest Indigenous organisation forced to shut up shop". Pro Bono Australia. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  17. ^ "Closure of Aboriginal organisation means loss of First People's voice: former co-chairman". The Canberra Times. 17 October 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  18. ^ Noel Pearson (September 2014). "A Rightful Place: Race, recognition and a more complete commonwealth". Quarterly Essay (55).
  19. ^ "In office – Harold Holt – Australia's PMs – Australia's Prime Ministers". Primeministers.naa.gov.au. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  20. ^ Indigenous Constitutional Recognition: The 1967 Referendum and Today; Russell Taylor, APH
  21. ^ Chrysanthos, Natassia (27 May 2019). "What is the Uluru Statement from the Heart?". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 5 July 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2020.
  22. ^ Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians (January 2012). Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution : Report of the Expert Panel (PDF). Commonwealth of Australia. ISBN 9781921975295. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
  23. ^ "Tony Abbott dreams of an indigenous PM". The Australian. 13 November 2013. (subscription required)
  24. ^ corporateName=Commonwealth Parliament; address=Parliament House, Canberra. "Final Report". www.aph.gov.au. Retrieved 30 November 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ Michael Gordon (25 June 2015). "Time to end the constitution's silence on Australia's first people: report". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 4 November 2015.
  26. ^ "Indigenous referendum: Australians invited to join community conferences on recognition vote". Australian Broadcasting Corporation.; Australian Broadcasting Corporation; 6 July 2015
  27. ^ "Commissioner Gooda appointed to Referendum Council". humanrights.gov.au. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  28. ^ https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/2016-12/referendum_council_discussion_paper.pdf
  29. ^ "Uluru Statement from the Heart". referendumcouncil.org.au. Referendum Council. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
  30. ^ Final Report of the Referendum Council (PDF). Commonwealth of Australia. 2017. p. 15.
  31. ^ corporateName=Commonwealth Parliament; address=Parliament House, Canberra. "Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition Relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples". www.aph.gov.au. Retrieved 29 November 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^ Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples (November 2018). Final report. Commonwealth of Australia. ISBN 978-1-74366-926-6. Retrieved 18 July 2020. PDF
  33. ^ corporateName=Commonwealth Parliament; address=Parliament House, Canberra. "2. Designing a First Nations Voice". www.aph.gov.au. Retrieved 30 September 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ "A voice for Indigenous Australians". Ministers Media Centre. 30 October 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  35. ^ Synot, Eddie (30 October 2019). "Ken Wyatt's proposed 'voice to government' marks another failure to hear Indigenous voices". The Conversation. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  36. ^ a b Grattan, Michelle (29 October 2019). "Proposed Indigenous 'voice' will be to government rather than to parliament". The Conversation. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  37. ^ a b Allam, Lorena (1 February 2020). "Man in the middle: Ken Wyatt on being caught between the Uluru statement and his party". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  38. ^ "Voice Co-Design Senior Advisory Group". Ministers Media Centre. 8 November 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  39. ^ Remeikis, Amy (8 November 2019). "Chris Kenny added to group working on Indigenous voice to parliament". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  40. ^ Wellington, Shahni (13 November 2019). "First meeting held by senior body for Indigenous Voice to government". NITV. Special Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  41. ^ Allam, Lorena (28 January 2020). "Josephine Cashman sacked from Indigenous advisory body after letter published by Andrew Bolt". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  42. ^ "Businesswoman ousted from advisory group after Andrew Bolt claim". The Sydney Morning Herald. 28 January 2020. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  43. ^ "Letter revealed to contain paragraphs lifted from academic papers and websites". NITV. 28 January 2020. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  44. ^ "National Co-design Group". Indigenous Voice. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  45. ^ Fryer, Brooke (4 March 2020). "Newly announced advisory body tasked with giving communities a voice". NITV. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  46. ^ "Indigenous voice Local and Regional Co-Design Group announced". National Indigenous Australians Agency. 4 March 2020. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  47. ^ "First Meeting of the Local & Regional Co-Design Group". National Indigenous Australians Agency. 19 March 2020. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  48. ^ Doran, Matthew (15 November 2020). "Minister Ken Wyatt wants Indigenous voice to government to pass parliament before next election". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  49. ^ "Indigenous voice to parliament to have no veto power under interim plans". The Guardian. 9 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  50. ^ "Indigenous Voice to parliament will get no veto power under interim proposal". SBS News. 9 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  51. ^ Lysaght, Gary-Jon (24 March 2021). "Indigenous Voice to Parliament to include regional voices to address local issues". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
  52. ^ Langton, Marcia; Calma, Tom (July 2021). Indigenous Voice Co-design Process – Final Report to the Australian Government (PDF). ISBN 978-1-925364-72-9.
  53. ^ Tim Rowse (10 March 2022). "Review of the The Indigenous Voice Co-design Process: Final Report to the Australian Government". Australian Policy and History Network, Deakin University.
  54. ^ Langton & Calma 2021, ch. 2.8 "Functions", p. 148.
  55. ^ Langton & Calma 2021, p. 7.
  56. ^ Martin, Sarah (19 November 2021). "Indigenous voice to parliament legislation 'imminent', Coalition sources say". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
  57. ^ Brennan, Bridget (22 May 2022). "Debate over Indigenous Voice to Parliament may define Anthony Albanese's government". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
  58. ^ a b "Address to Garma Festival | Prime Minister of Australia". www.pm.gov.au. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  59. ^ Ella Archibald-Binge (29 July 2022). "Prime Minister to announce Australia's first referendum in 20 years at Garma Festival. Here's what you might be asked". ABC News. Australia.
  60. ^ "Anthony Albanese reveals 'simple and clear' wording of referendum question on Indigenous voice". The Guardian Australia. 29 July 2022.
  61. ^ Langton & Calma 2021, ch. 2.8. "Role of the National Voice, p. 148.
  62. ^ "Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984", Schedule 1, Forms
  63. ^ George Williams (8 August 2022). "Labor should take a step back in voice debate". The Australian. p. 11.
  64. ^ a b "First meetings of Referendum Working Group & Referendum Engagement Group". Prime Minister of Australia. 29 September 2022. Retrieved 13 October 2022. Text has been copied from this source, which is available under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
  65. ^ "Our People – The Uluru Statement". From The Heart. 15 March 2020. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  66. ^ Collard, Sarah (25 August 2022). "Don't let 'low bar politics' hold back Indigenous voice, advocate to say in Lingiari lecture". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 September 2022.
  67. ^ a b Cassidy, Caitlin (9 May 2022). "Australians urged to back Indigenous voice to parliament in History is Calling campaign". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
  68. ^ Riches, Caroline (25 September 2022). "'This is your business': Uluru Statement leaders launch ad asking Australians to give them a voice". SBS News. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
  69. ^ Nationals will oppose Indigenous Voice to Parliament; 9news.com.au; Nov 28, 2022
  70. ^ Beyond Belief - Rethinking the Voice to Parliament; Edited by Peter Kurti and Nyunggai Warren Mundine; ISBN 9781925138795
  71. ^ Vic Liberals will be asking 'what message' was lost with the people: Joyce; youtube.com; Nov 28, 2022
  72. ^ Howard’s sway: the former PM speaks out on the voice; The Australian; 19 November 2022
  73. ^ Pass or fail, this referendum will surely leave us worse off; The Australian; Nov 4, 2022
  74. ^ Greens Senator Lidia Thorpe attacks Voice referendum; smh.com.au; September 1, 2022
  75. ^ Lidia Thorpe wants to shift course on Indigenous recognition. Here’s why we must respect the Uluru Statement; theconversation.com; 8 July 2020
  76. ^ https://www.onenation.org.au/one-nation-to-lead-no-case-on-voice
  77. ^ https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-28/nationals-to-oppose-voice-to-parliament/101706466
  78. ^ Wellington, Shahni (15 July 2020). "'Hugely encouraging': Voice to Parliament advocates boosted by poll". NITV. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  79. ^ "Poll Shows Strong Rise in Support for Constitutional Change to Create Indigenous Voice to Parliament". From The Heart. 15 July 2020. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  80. ^ "Vote Compass data finds most Australians support Indigenous Voice to Parliament – and it has grown since the last election". ABC News. Australia. 4 May 2022.
  81. ^ Malcolm Turnbull (15 August 2022). "I will be voting yes to establish an Indigenous voice to parliament". The Guardian. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  82. ^ Sydney Morning Herald (26 September 2022). "Voters back the Voice – but there's doubt over what they're backing".
  83. ^ Australian Financial Review (29 August 2022). "Voters are very confused over Indigenous Voice: survey".
  84. ^ Essential (9 August 2022). "The Essential Report: 09 August 2022".
  85. ^ Australia Institute (31 July 2022). [hhttps://australiainstitute.org.au/report/polling-voice-to-parliament-in-the-constitution/ "Polling – Voice to Parliament in the Constitution"].
  86. ^ Australia Institute (31 July 2022). "Polling – Voice to Parliament in the Constitution".
  87. ^ Essential (6 July 2021). "Support and priority of Indigenous Issues".
  88. ^ Special Broadcasting Service (16 September 2020). "'Hugely encouraging': Voice to Parliament advocates boosted by poll".
  89. ^ Sydney Morning Herald (30 May 2020). "Keeping hope alive: the push to revive the Statement from the Heart".
  90. ^ The Guardian (12 July 2019). "Essential poll: majority of Australians want Indigenous recognition and voice to parliament".
  91. ^ Essential (27 June 2019). "The Essential Report" (PDF).
  92. ^ Essential (27 February 2018). "The Essential Report" (PDF).
  93. ^ Essential (7 November 2017). "Uluru Statement".
  94. ^ Essential (6 June 2017). "Uluru Statement".
  95. ^ "Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander - Elected Body". Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  96. ^ Dunstan, Joseph (5 November 2019). "Victorian Aboriginal voters have elected a treaty assembly. So what's next?". ABC News. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  97. ^ Jenkins, Shannon (7 May 2021). "SA premier flags plan for Indigenous Voice to parliament". The Mandarin. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
  98. ^ Smith, Douglas (23 March 2022). "What SA's new govt wants to achieve in Aboriginal affairs". NITV. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
  99. ^ "Next steps in implementing the Uluru Statement". Premier of South Australia. 4 July 2022. Retrieved 13 July 2022.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indigenous_Voice_to_Parliament&oldid=1124874598"