Jan Lokpal Bill
|This article is outdated. (December 2013)|
The Jan Lokpal Bill, also referred to as the Citizen's Ombudsman Bill, is an anti-corruption bill drafted and drawn up by civil society activists in India seeking the appointment of a Jan Lokpal, an independent body to investigate corruption cases. This bill also proposes improvements to the Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill 2011, which was to be passed by Lok Sabha in December 2011.
The Jan Lokpal Bill aims to effectively deter corruption, compensate citizen grievances, and protect whistle-blowers. The prefix Jan (translation: citizens) signifies that these improvements include inputs provided by "ordinary citizens" through an activist-driven, non-governmental public consultation.
The word Lokpal was coined in 1963 by late Mr. L.M. Singhvi, a member of parliament during a debate.
To draw the attention of the government, a focused campaign "India Against Corruption" (IAC) was started in 2011. Anna Hazare is the head of civil society and the IAC movement. Being a foreground for Jan Lokpal campaign. Through these collaborative efforts till August 2011, IAC was able to upload the 23rd version of the Jan Lokpal Bill draft. As of January 2014, the Delhi State Government led by CM Arvind Kejriwal was preparing to adopt the Jan Lokpal Bill, but was unable to introduce it to the house, resigning moments later.
- 1 Lokpal Bill
- 2 Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)
- 3 Key features of proposed bill
- 4 Difference between government's and activists' drafts
- 5 Governments approach about Whistleblower protection & Citizen-charter
- 6 Campaign for the Jan Lokpal Bill
- 7 Criticisms of the Jan Lokpal Bill
- 8 Support for the bill
- 9 Parliamentary actions on the proposed legislation
- 10 Rejection and Protest
- 11 See also
- 12 References
- 13 External links
The Lokpal Bill was first introduced by Adv. Shanti Bhushan in 1968 and passed the 4th Lok Sabha in 1969. But before it could be passed by Rajya Sabha, the Lok Sabha was dissolved and the bill lapsed. Subsequent versions were re-introduced in 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996, 1998, 2001, 2005 and in 2008, but none of them were passed.
In 2011, during the Parliament's Winter Session, the Lok Sabha passed the controversial Lokpal Bill, but could not be passed by Rajya Sabha due to shortage of time in the winter session of 2011. The Government tabled the Lokpal Bill in the Rajya Sabha on 13 December 2013 and the debate was adjourned till 16 December 2013. The Lokpal Bill was finally passed on 17 December 2013 in the Rajya Sabha. It was passed in the Lok Sabha on 18 December 2013.
Timeline and cost
The Lokpal Bill has been introduced in the Parliament a total of eight times since 1968.
- 1968 – 200,000
- 1971 – 20 lakh
- 1977 – 25 lakh
- 1985 – 25 lakh
- 1989 – 35 lakh – PM under lokpal
- 1996 – 1 crore – PM under lokpal
- 2001 – 35 crore – PM under lokpal
- 2011 – 17 billion
- 2012 – 20.50 billion
- 2013 – 21 billion
- 2013 – 28 billion
Current anti-corruption laws and organisations
While India currently has a number of laws intended to stem corruption, supporters of the Jan Lokpal Bill have argued that the current laws are inadequate in light of the large number and size of scandals in India.
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)
CVC has a staff strength of between 200 and 250 employees. If one went by international standards, India needs 28,500 anti-corruption staff in CVC to check corruption of 5.7 million employees.
There has been considerable delay in many cases for grant of sanction for prosecution against corrupt government officials. The permission to prosecute such officials acts as a deterrent in the drive to eradicate corruption and bring transparency in the system.
Central Bureau of Investigation
Independent of the government and free from ministerial influence in its investigations.
The bill was inspired by the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC). In the 1970s, the level of corruption in Hong Kong was seen so high, that the government created the commission with direct powers to investigate and deal with corruption. In the first instance, the ICAC sacked 119 out of 180 police officers.[where?]
Key features of proposed bill
Some important features of the proposed bill are:
- To establish a central government anti-corruption institution called Lokpal, supported by Lokayukta at the state level.
- As is the case with the Supreme Court of India and Cabinet Secretariat, the Lokpal will be supervised by the Cabinet Secretary and the Election Commission. As a result, it will be completely independent of the government and free from ministerial influence in its investigations.
- Members will be appointed by judges, Indian Administrative Service officers with a clean record, private citizens and constitutional authorities through a transparent and participatory process.
- A selection committee will invite short-listed candidates for interviews, the video recordings of which will thereafter be made public.
- Every month on its website, the Lokayukta will publish a list of cases dealt with, brief details of each, their outcome and any action taken or proposed. It will also publish lists of all cases received by the Lokayukta during the previous month, cases dealt with and those which are pending.
- Inquiry has to be completed within 60 days and investigation to be completed within six months. Lokpal shall order an investigation only after hearing the public servant.
- Losses to the government by a corrupt individual will be recovered at the time of conviction.
- Government office-work required by a citizen that is not completed within a prescribed time period will result in Lokpal imposing financial penalties on those responsible, which will then be given as compensation to the complainant.
- Complaints against any officer of Lokpal will be investigated and completed within one month and, if found to be substantive, will result in the officer being dismissed within two months.
- The existing anti-corruption agencies [CVC], departmental vigilance and the anti-corruption branch of the [CBI] will be merged into Lokpal which will have complete power authority to independently investigate and prosecute any officer, judge or politician.
- Whistle-blowers who alert the agency to potential corruption cases will also be provided with protection.
Difference between government's and activists' drafts
|Jan Lokpal Bill (Citizen's Ombudsman Bill)||Draft Lokpal Bill (2010)|
|Lokpal will have powers to initiate suo motu action or receive complaints of corruption from the general public.||Lokpal will have no power to initiate suo motu action or receive complaints of corruption from the general public. It can only probe complaints forwarded by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.|
|Lokpal wil have the power to initiate prosecution of anyone found guilty.||Lokpal will only be an Advisory Body with a role limited to forwarding reports to a "Competent Authority".|
|Lokpal will have police powers as well as the ability to register FIRs.||Lokpal will have no police powers and no ability to register an FIR or proceed with criminal investigations.|
|Lokpal and the anti corruption wing of the CBI will be one independent body.||The CBI and Lokpal will be unconnected.|
|Punishments will be a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of up to life imprisonment.||Punishment for corruption will be a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of up to 7 years.|
Comparison SlideShow uploaded by India Against Corruption.
|Issue||The Jan Lokpal Bill||Government's Lokpal Bill|
|Prime Minister||PM can be investigated with permission of seven member Lokpal bench.[clarification needed]||PM can be investigated by Lokpal after she/he vacates office.|
|Judiciary||Can be investigated, though high level members may be investigated only with permission of a seven member Lokpal bench.[clarification needed]||Judiciary is exempt and will be covered by a separate "judicial accountability bill".|
|Conduct of MPs||Can be investigated with permission of seven member Lokpal bench.[clarification needed]||Can be investigated, but their conduct within Parliament, such as voting, cannot be investigated.|
|Lower bureaucracy||All public servants would be included.||Only senior officers (Group A) will be covered.|
|Anti-Corruption wing of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)||The Anti-Corruption wing of the CBI will be merged into the Lokpal.||The Anti-Corruption wing of the CBI cannot be merged into the Lokpal.|
|Removal of Lokpal members and Chair||Any person can bring a complaint to the Supreme Court, who can then recommend removal of any member to the President.||Any "aggrieved party" can raise a complaint to the President, who will refer the matter to the CJI.|
|Removal of Lokpal staff and officers||Complaints against Lokpal staff will be handled by independent boards set-up in each state, composed of retired bureaucrats, judges, and civil society members.||Lokpal will conduct inquiries into its own behaviour.|
|Lokayukta||Lokayukta and other local/state anti-corruption agency would remain in place.||All state anti-corruption agencies would be closed and responsibilities taken over by centralised Lokpal.|
|Whistleblower protection||Whistleblowers are protected by Lokpal.||No protection granted to whistleblowers by Lokpal.|
|Punishment for corruption||Lokpal can either directly impose penalties, or refer the matter to the courts. Penalties can include removal from office, imprisonment, and recovery of assets from those who benefited from the corruption.||Lokpal can only refer matters to the courts, not take any direct punitive actions. Penalties remain equivalent to those in current laws.|
|Investigatory powers||Lokpal can obtain wiretaps (to make a connection to a telegraph or telephone wire to obtain information secretly), issue rogatory letters, and recruit investigating officers. Cannot issue contempt orders.||Lokpal can issue contempt orders, and has the ability to punish those in contempt. No authority to obtain wiretaps, issue rogatory letters, or recruit investigating officers.|
|False, frivolous and vexatious complaints||Lokpal can issue fines for frivolous complaints (including frivolous complaints against Lokpal itself), with a maximum penalty of Rs 100,000.||Court system will handle matters of frivolous complaints. Courts can give 2–5 years imprisonment and fines of Rs 25,000 to 200,000.|
|NGOs||NGOs not within the scope due to their role in exposing corruption.||NGOs are within the scope and can be investigated.|
Governments approach about Whistleblower protection & Citizen-charter
In a bid to narrow differences on the anti-graft legislation and provide itself some political cover against the threat of a public protest, the Government introduced Citizen's Charter and Grievance Redressal Bill 2011 or Citizen-charter bill in 20 Dec 2011 along with the already introduced Whistleblower Protection Law or Public Interest Disclosure (Protection of Information) Bill – 2010 back in August 2011.
Responding to this move, Team Anna issued a statement that: “The government proposes to remove CBI, judiciary, citizen charter, whistle blower protection, Group C and Group D employees from the Lokpal jurisdiction. Wouldn't that reduce Lokpal to an empty tin box with no powers and functions?”. This issue remains open between Team Anna & Government.
Campaign for the Jan Lokpal Bill
The first version of the Lokpal Bill drafted by the Government of India headed by United Progressive Alliance in 2010 was considered ineffective by anti-corruption activists from the civil society. These activists, under the banner of IAC, came together to draft a citizen's version of the Lokpal Bill later called the Jan Lokpal. Public awareness drives and protest marches were carried out to campaign for the bill. However, public support for the Jan Lokpal Bill draft started gathering steam after Anna Hazare, a Gandhian announced that he would hold an indefinite fast from 5 April 2011 for the passing of the Lokpal/ Jan Lokpal bill. The government has however accepted it.
To dissuade Hazare from going on an indefinite hunger strike, the Office of the Prime Minister directed the personnel and law ministries to see how the views of social activists can be included in the bill. On 5 April, the National Advisory Council rejected the Lokpal bill drafted by the government. Union Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal then met social activists Swami Agnivesh and Arvind Kejriwal on 7 April to find ways to bridge differences over the bill. However, no consensus could be reached on 7 April owing to several differences of opinion between the social activists and the Government.
Fast & agitation – Phase 1
On 7 April 2011 Anna Hazare called for a Jailemands. Anna Hazare also claimed that his group had received six crore (60 million) text messages of support and that he had further backing from a large number of Internet activists. The outpouring of support was largely free of political overtones; political parties were specifically discouraged from participating in the movement. The fast ended on 9 April, after 98 hours, when the Government accepted most demands due to public pressure. Anna Hazare set a deadline, 15 August, for the passing of the bill in the Parliament, failing which he would start a hunger strike from 16 August. The fast also led to the Government of India agreeing to set up a Joint Drafting Committee, which would complete its work by 30 June 2011. 
Lokpal round table by Dr.Jayaprakashnarayan of the Loksatta FDR (Foundation for Democratic Reforms)
Foundation of Democratic reforms lead by Dr.Jayaprakashnarayan of Loksatta has organised a round table conference on 24 April. List of Attendees.
- Justice MN Venkatachaliah, Former Chief Justice of India
- Justice JS Verma, Former Chief Justice of India
- Justice Santosh Hegde, Former Supreme Court Judge & Karnataka Lokayukta
- Justice Rajindar Sachar, Former Chief Justice – High Court of Delhi
- Sri N Gopalaswami, Former Chief Election Commissioner of India
- Sri TS Krishnamurthy, Former Chief Election Commissioner of India
- Sri Pratyush Sinha, former Chief Vigilance Commissioner
- Sri PS Ramamohan Rao, Former Governor Tamil Nadu
- Sri C Anjaneya Reddy, Former DGP Andhra Pradesh
- Sri Ashok Arora, Advicate & former Secretary Supreme Court Bar Association
- Sri Ashwin Mahesh, an innovator, professor at IIM Bangalore, Urban Strategy advisor for Govt. of Karnataka
- Shri Aravind Kejariwal, Social Activist, Parivartan
- Sri P.S. Bawa, Chairman, Transparency International India
- Dr Bhaskar Rao, Chairman, Centre for Media Studies
- Dr. R. Balasubramaniam, Founder, Swami Vivekananda Youth Movement
- Smt Devaki Jain, formerly professor at the Delhi University
- Sri K.N. Govindacharya, Thinker and Ideologue
- Dr Jayaprakash Narayan, general secretary, Foundation for Democratic Reforms & Founder of Lok Satta
- Dr Kamal Kumar, former Director, National Police Academy
- Sri Karthik Chandra, Research Coordinator, FDR
- Smt Kiran Bedi, Social Activist & Former Police Office
- Sri Kuldip Nayar, Noted Journalist
- Sri BR Lal, Former DGP Haryana and Jt. Director CBI
- Ms Maja Daruwala, director, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
- Ms Madhu Kishwar, a leading feminist, and editor of Manushi (a journal devoted to human rights and women's rights issues)
- Sri Mazer Hussain, Director COVA, Hyderabad
- Sri Manish Sisodia, RTI Activist, Parivartan
- Sri Nikhil Dey, Social Activist, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan,Rajasthan
- Sri Prakash Singh, Formerly Director General BSF, DGP UP and Assam,
- Ms Padma Bhupathiraju, People for Lok Satta (USA)
- Sri Prashant Bhushan, Supreme Court Advocate
- Sri Parth J. Shah, President, Centre for Civil Society
- Sri P S Ramamohan Rao, Former Governor Tamil Nadu
- Sri R Ramaswamy Iyer, former Secretary, Water Resources, Govt of India
- Prof. Rajani Ranjan Jha, Prof. Political Science, Banaras Hindu University
- Sri TR Raghunandan, former Secretary, Govt of Karnataka
- Dr. Trinath Mishra, Former Director, CBI
- Sri Soli Sorabjee, Former Attorney General of India
- Shri Shanti Bhushan, Former Union Law Minister and well known Supreme Court Advocate
- Sri Sanjay Parikh, Supreme Court Advocate
- Sri Subhash C Kashyap, Member of the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution and Chairman of its Drafting and Editorial Committee.
- Sri Sudesh Agarwal, President of Smast Bhartiya Party
- Sri K C Sivaramakrishnan, Former Secretary to Government of India
- Sri Surendra Srivastava, board member, Foundation for Democratic Reforms & Founder of Lok Satta and Lok Satta Party in Maharashtra an in charge of promoting Lok Satta Aandolan/ Party across India
- Sri R Sreenivasan, Former Chief Secretary of Punjab
- Sri Swami Agnivesh, Social reformer
- Sri Shanmughan, social activist Ref – 103 & 104
The drafting committee was officially formed on 8 April 2011. It consisted of the following ten members, including five from the government and five drawn from the civil society. The former Minister of the Law and Justice is part of the drafting committee.
|Member||Qualifications and status|
|P. Chidambaram||Finance Minister|
|Shanti Bhushan||Former Minister of Law and Justice, Co-Chairman|
|Sushilkumar Shinde||Minister of Home Affairs|
|Veerappa Moily||Minister of Corporate Affairs|
|Kapil Sibal||Minister for Human Resource Development|
|Salman Khursid||Minister of Law|
|Anna Hazare||Social Activist|
|N. Santosh Hegde||Former Lokayukta (Karnataka) and Supreme Court Justice|
|Arvind Kejriwal||Chief Minister (New Delhi), RTI Activist.|
The Government's handling of the formation of the draft committee, involving the civil society in preparation of the draft Lokpal bill, was criticised by various political parties including Bharatiya Janata Party, Biju Janata Dal, Telugu Desam Party, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Communist Party of India, Rashtriya Janata Dal, Janata Dal (U) and Samajwadi Party.
The committee failed to agree on the terms of a compromise bill and the government introduced its own version of the bill in the Parliament in August 2011.
Fast & agitation – Phase 2
According to Anna and his team, the Government's version of the Lokpal bill was weak and would facilitate the corrupt to go free apart from several other differences. To protest against this, Anna Hazare announced an "Indefinite Fast" (not to be confused with "Fast until death"). Anna and his team asked for permission from Delhi Police for their fast and agitation at Jantar Mantar or JP Park. Delhi Police gave its permission with certain conditions. These conditions were considered by team Anna as restrictive and against the fundamental constitutional rights and they decided to defy the conditions. Delhi Police imposed Sec 144 CrPC.
On 16 August, Anna Hazare was taken into preventive custody by Delhi Police. Senior officers of Delhi Police reached Anna Hazare's flat early in the morning and informed him that he could not leave his home. However, Hazare turned down the request following which he was detained.Anna in his recorded address to the nation before his arrest asked his supporters not to stop the agitation and urged the protesters to remain peaceful.Other members of IAC – Arvind Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi, Kumar Vishwas and Manish Sisodia – were also taken into preventive custody. Kiran Bedi described the situation as resembling a kind of Emergency (referring to the State of Emergency imposed in 1975 by the Indira Gandhi Govt.).
The arrest resulted in a huge public outcry and under pressure, the government released him in the evening of 16 August. However, Anna Hazare refused to come out of jail, starting his indefinite fast from Jail itself. Manish Sisodia explained his situation as, "Anna said that he left home to go to JP Park to conduct his fast and that is exactly where he would go from here (Tihar Jail). He has refused to be released till he is given a written, unconditional permission". Unwilling to use forces owing to the sensitive nature of the case, the jail authorities had no option but to let Anna spend the night inside Tihar. Later on 17 August, Delhi Police permitted Anna Hazare and team to use the Ramlila Maidan for the proposed fast and agitation, withdrawing most of the contentious provisions they had imposed earlier. The indefinite fast and agitation began in Ramlila Maidan, New Delhi, and went on for around 288 hours (12 days from 16 August-2011 to 28 August-2011). Some of the Lokpal drafting committee members became dissatisfied with Hazare's tactics as the hunger strike went on for the 11th day: Santosh Hegde, a member of Hazare team who headed the Karnataka Lokayukta, strongly criticised Hazare for his insistence of "having his way", concluding “I feel I am not in Team Anna any more by the way things are going. These (telling Parliament what to do) are not democratic things.” Swami Agnivesh, another central figure in the Hazare group also distanced himself.
Notable supporters and opposition
In addition to the activists responsible for creating and organising support for the bill, a wide variety of other notable individuals have also stated that they support this bill. Spiritual leaders Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Yog Guru Ramdev expressed support. Notable politicians who indicated support for the bill include Ajit Singh and Manpreet Singh Badal as well as the principal opposition party, Bharatiya Janta Party. In addition, numerous Bollywood actors, directors, and musicians publicly approved of the bill.
Notable opposition to the activists' version of the Bill was expressed by HRD minister Kapil Sibal and other Congress leaders; Chief Minister of West Bengal Mamta Banerjee; Punjab Chief Minister and Akali Dal leader Prakash Singh Badal; Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray, and former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Jagdish Sharan Verma. Although Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) showed their support earlier, there were reports that BJP shared Congress's concern "over letting the civil society gain the upper hand over Parliament in lawmaking". The All-India Confederation of SC/ST Organisations, representing the Dalits and backward castes, also expressed opposition to the bill proposed by Anna Hazare as well as to the government's version of the bill. The confederation opposed Hazare's proposed bill saying that it will be above the constitution and that proposers of the bill have support from elements who oppose reservation.
Logjam of Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill 2011
On 27 December 2011, Lok Sabha Parliament winter session passed controversial Lokpal Bill under title of Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill 2011, but without constitutional status. Before passing this bill it was introduced in Lok Sabha with key amendments moved. The 10-hour house debate, number of opposition parties claimed introduced bill is weak and wanted it withdrawn. Key amendments that were discussed but defeated were following:
- Including corporates, media and NGOs receiving donations
- Bringing CBI under the purview of Lokpal
Amendments that the house agreed upon were:
- Keeping the defence forces and coast guard personnel out of the purview of the anti-graft ombudsman
- Increasing the exemption time of former MPs from five to seven years
- Government will have all the control over Lokpal as it will have powers to appoint and remove members at its will.
- Only 10 per cent political leaders are covered by this Bill
- Bill was also covering temples, mosques and churches
- Bill was offering favour to corruption accused by offering them free lawyer service.
- Bill was also unclear about handling corruption within Lokpal office.
- Only five per cent of employees are in its ambit, as Class C & D officers were not included.
- Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should be merged with the Lokpal, and the anti-corruption bureaus and the Vigilance Departments of the State governments with the Lokayuktas.
- The Lokpal and the Lokayuktas should have their own investigative wings with exclusive jurisdiction over cases filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
- The Lokpal should have administrative and financial control over the CBI, and the appointment of the CBI Director should be independent of any political control.
- The jurisdiction of the Lokpal and the Lokayukta should cover Class C and D officers directly.
This bill was then presented in Rajya Sabha where it hit log jam again.
Criticisms of the Jan Lokpal Bill
The bill has been criticised as being naïve in its approach to combating corruption. According to Pratap Bhanu Mehta, President of the Center for Policy Research Delhi, the bill "is premised on an institutional imagination that is at best naïve; at worst subversive of representative democracy". The very concept of a Lokpal concept has received criticism from Human Resource Development minister Kapil Sibal in that it will lack accountability, be oppressive and undemocratic.
Kejriwal rejects the claim of Lokpal being extra-constitutional with the explanation that the body will only investigate corruption offences and submit a charge sheet which would then tried and prosecuted through trial courts and higher courts, and that other bodies with equivalent powers in other matters exist. The proposed bill also lists clear provisions for the Supreme Court to abolish the Lokpal.
Despite these clarifications, critics feel that the exact judicial powers of Lokpal are rather unclear in comparison with its investigative powers. The bill requires "...members of Lokpal and the officers in investigation wing of Lokpal shall be deemed to be police officers". Although some supporters have denied any judicial powers of Lokpal, the government and some critics have recognised Lokpal to have quasi-judicial powers.
The bill also states that "Lokpal shall have, and exercise the same jurisdiction powers and authority in respect of contempt of itself as a High court has and may exercise, and, for this purpose, the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Central Act 70 of 1971) shall have the effect subject to the modification that the references therein to the High Court shall be construed as including a reference to the Lokpal." Review of proceedings and decisions by Lokpal is prevented in the bill by the statement "...no proceedings or decision of the Lokpal shall be liable to be challenged, reviewed, quashed or called in question in any court of ordinary Civil Jurisdiction.". As a result, how the trials will be conducted is unclear in the bill, although the bill outlines requiring judges for special courts, presumably to conduct trial that should be completed within one year. The critics hence express concern that, without judicial review, Lokpal could potentially become an extra-constitutional body with investigative and judicial powers whose decisions cannot be reviewed in regular courts.
The matter of whether the Indian Prime Minister and higher judiciary should or should not be prosecutable by the Lokpal remains as one of the major issues of dispute. Anna's own nominee for co-chairing the joint panel Justice Verma, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, has expressed his constitutional objections for including the Prime Minister and higher judiciary under Lokpal. According to him, "this would foul with the basic structure of the constitution".
Criticism from Aruna Roy, Arundhati Roy and NCPRI
Ramon Magsaysay Award winner Aruna Roy who has said "Vesting jurisdiction over the length and breadth of the government machinery in one institution will concentrate too much power in the institution, while the volume of work will make it difficult to carry out its tasks". She and her colleagues at the National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI) have proposed an alternative mechanism consisting of five institutions. Noted author and social activist Arundhati Roy was highly critical of Lokpal, stating "you could say that the Maoists and the Jan Lokpal Bill have one thing in common – they both seek the overthrow of the Indian State", and "While his means may be Gandhian, Anna Hazare's demands are certainly not. Contrary to Gandhiji's ideas about the decentralisation of power, the Jan Lokpal Bill is a draconian, anti-corruption law, in which a panel of carefully chosen people will administer a giant bureaucracy,.."
Criticism from the Director of CBI
The CBI in a presentation before the Standing Committee of the Parliament, has strongly argued against the vivisection of the CBI and merger of its anticorruption wing with the Lokpal, noting that this would seriously cripple the core functioning of the CBI and reduce it to irrelevance. An organisation built over last 60 years comprising competent professionals should not be subsumed under Lokpal. CBI officers concede that in some sensitive political cases there is of course interference from the government, but in respect of an overwhelming majority of cases CBI functions, unfettered and uninfluenced by extraneous considerations. For this reason there is an ever increasing demand for CBI investigation from all-over the country in respect of important cases.
However, in a contradictory TOI article in August 2011, it has been revealed that one its own report says that the CBI is still finding itself waiting for a go-ahead from central agencies so that it can initiate criminal proceedings against high-ranking officials.
Support for the bill
IAC conducted a survey on the draft Lokpal Bill presented by the Indian Government in Parliament. It showed that 85% of the participants were opposed to the government's bill. The team especially cited the results from the Chandni Chowk constituency, the constituency of Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal, who is a vehement voice for the government's version of the bill.
According to a nationwide survey conducted by CNN-IBN & CNBC-TV18 and published in early August, only a shade over a third of respondents have heard of Lokpal. 34% of all respondents said they have heard of the ombudsman and only 24% knew what it actually meant
Post the massive support to Anna Hazare's movement, several MPs across party lines have come out in support to the Jan Lokpal Bill. Most notable are Congress MPs from Maharashtra, Priya Dutt and Datta Meghe. Datta Meghe also demanded that his party spokesperson Manish Tiwari should apologise to Anna Hazare for his uncharitable comments.
This support started coming as over 150 MPs and Ministers from different states were forced to remain confined to their houses as Anna supporters protested outside their houses. Protests were also seen outside the residence of Sheila Dixit Ex-CM of Delhi, Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee amongst others.
BJP MP Varun Gandhi is introducing Jan Lokpal Bill as a private member's bill in the parliament.
As per reports, Anna Hazare's fast was successful in mobilising the support of thousands in the virtual world of social media. On Independence Day, Anna had over 500,000 mentions through status updates and comments across top social networking sites, including Facebook and Twitter in the country. Two days later, the number had shot up to 9 million.On YouTube, over 40,000 people watched the video shot by Kiran Bedi inside Tihar Jail in which Anna has addressed his supporters. Facebook has 542 fan pages by Anna's name. A portal www.iacbranding.org has also been launched by the IAC activists to provide design logistics for movement's publicity as banner, poster, handbill to be used by the IAC Activists all over India and abroad.
- According to the survey conducted by STAR News and Nielsen, 87% of the 8900 respondents of the survey supported the Jan Lokpal Bill. The survey – conducted in 28 cities across the country, including all four metros – mainly dealt with three important points: public’s knowledge about the Lokpal Bill; awareness about Anna’s campaign; and the perceived problems with the Jan Lokpal Bill.
- Over a million people joined the Times of India online anti-graft campaign, in one of the biggest ever voting exercises in the virtual world. The news analysis points that citizens want to make their voices heard and have found the platform offered by the campaign a viable one to do so.
Parliamentary actions on the proposed legislation
On 27 August 2011, a special and all exclusive session of Parliament was conducted and a resolution was unanimously passed after deliberations in both the houses of Indian Parliament by sense of the house.
Photos of Round Table on Lokpal
List of attendees of Round Table on Lokpal
- A citizen charter on the bill
- An appropriate mechanism to subject lower bureaucracy to Lokpal
- The establishment of Lokayuktas (ombudsmen at state level) in states
Hazare welcomed this development, terming it as a battle "half won" while ending the protest.
Rejection and Protest
42 members were against the bill while 27 MLAs, supported it. Thus the resolution failed and Arvind Kejriwal resigned from his post of Chief Minister.
- Corruption in India
- Corruption Perceptions Index
- 2012 Indian anti-corruption movement
- 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement
- Indian political scandals
- List of scams in India
- Aam Aadmi Party
- Lok Satta Party
- "What is the Jan Lokpal Bill, why it's important". NDTV. 16 August 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "Bill as Passed by Lok Sabha is available here".
- "Lok Sabha passes Lokpal Bil". Indian Express. 27 December 2011.
- "Support for Anna Hazare grows online". Times of India. Retrieved 16 August 2011.
- "Jan Lokpal Bill version 1.8 PDF". Retrieved 16 August 2011.
- "Delhi anti-corruption chief minister Arvind Kejriwal quits". BBC NEWS. 14 February 2014.
- "Minutes of meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee of the Lokpal Bill". Govt. of India. Retrieved 17 August 2011. See Page 3, point 6
- 43 years, eight Lokpal bills, zero consensus, IANS, 26 August 2011, The Economic Times www.economictimes.com]
- "Lokpal bill to cover PM". CNN-IBN. 21 November 2010.
-  Hindustan Times 13 December 2013
-  First Post 18 December 2013
- The Due Bill, Dinesh Naranayan, business.in.com
- Central Vigilance Commission Introduction, ficial website
- "Lokpal Bill: Leaving out lower bureaucracy will not help common man, says Team Anna". TOI. 6 December 2011.
- "CVC to write to government for speedy sanction for prosecution". The Economic Times. 31 January 2012.
- "India marcheslka.com/story_main48.asp?filename=Ws280111SOCIETY_II.asp". Tehelka. 28 January 2011.
- "India should learn a lesson from Hong Kong on tackling corruption". Economic Times (India). 6 August 2011.
- "Remove the shield of the corrupt", The Economic Times
- "Lokpal Bill: Govt version vs civil society version". The Times of India. 7 April 2011. Retrieved 7 April 2011.
- "Differences abound, both major and minor, in competing Lokpal drafts". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 23 June 2011. Retrieved 18 August 2011.
- "Lokpal Bill: Differences between Govt draft and Team Anna's draft". Times of India. 22 June 2011.
- "Govt's Lokpal draft targets NGOs, leaves out govt officials, says activists". The Times of India. 24 June 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Lokpal Bill Views".
- "Comparison between the Lok Pal Bill introduced in Lok Sabha and the Jan Lok Pal Bill". PRS. 4 August 2011. Retrieved 16 August 2011.
- "Lokpal bill: Govt plans all-party meet to shield itself from attack". Times of India. 11 December 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
- "Lokpal Bill reduced to empty tin box with no powers: Team Anna". The Hindu.
- "Social activists draft new Lokpal Bill". DNA. 24 December 2010.
- "Drive around Delhi to demand strong Lokpal Bill". Sify News. 13 March. Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
- "Anna Hazare announces fast unto death till Jan Lokpal Bill enacted". The Economic Times. 4 April 2011. Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
- "Mumbai to join Hazare's fast today for Jan Lokpal". The Indian Express. 5 April 2011. Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
- "Find ways to include activists' opinion: PMO". The Hindustan Times. 10 March 2011. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "Hazare fast: Sibal meets Agnivesh, Kejriwal to pursue constructive dialogue". TruthDive. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "Anna Hazare announces jail bharo movement on April 13". Indian Express. 8 April 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- NULL. "Anna Hazare: I asked PM whether his team shares his values – Forbes India". Moneycontrol.com. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "Hazare fast: people heckle, chase out politicos – Politics – Politics News – ibnlive". Ibnlive.in.com. 3 February 2010. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "Anna sets Aug 15 deadline for Lokpal Bill". CBB IBN. 10 April 2011.
- Resolution, New Delhi, 8 April 2011, Ministry of Law and Justice, India.
- "Lokpal Bill drafting committee: Pranab Chairman; Shanti Bhushan co-Chairman". NDTV. 9 April 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "Govt Attacked for Involving Civil Society in Drafting Lokpal". news.outlookindia.com. 3 July 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "Govt attacked for involving civil society in drafting Lokpal". Indian Express. 4 July 2011.
- "Lokpal bill moved in Lok Sabha". Deccan Herald. 4 August 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "No Permission for Hazare's Fast". Rediff. 15 August 2011.
- "JP Park – Anna Hazare – Delhi Police". Times of India. 16 August 2011.
- "Anna Hazare to be released from Tihar Jail". NDTV.
- "Anna Hazare breaks fast after 288 hours, nation relieved". India Times. 28 August 2011.
- Team member Santosh Hegde says Anna can't have his way with Parliament, Indian Express, 26 August 2011
- Agnivesh distances himself from Anna's stir The Hindu, 26 August 2011
- "Anna Hazare is the voice of millions of Indians: Sri Sri". Timesnow.Tv. 7 April 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "Anna Hazare goes on fast demanding anti-corruption law". Zeenews.com. 5 April 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "India against corruption: Ajit Singh supports Anna Hazare's campaign – Economic Times". Economictimes.indiatimes.com. 5 April 2011. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "Pass Jan Lokpal Bill in next Parliament session: Manpreet, IBN Live News". Ibnlive.in.com. 3 February 2010. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "BJP extends support to Hazare's fast on anti-graft bill". Inewsone.com. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- Special Correspondent (5 April 2011). "News / National: BJP seeks all-party meet on Lokpal Bill". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 9 April 2011.
- "Hazare calls for 'jail bharo' moevement". The Pioneer. India. 22 June 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "Anna Hazare's Jantar Mantar Crusade Against Corruption Gets Support From Aamir & Others!". Planet Bollywood. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "We should join hands with Hazare: Vishal Bhardwaj". Mangalorean.Com. 7 April 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- "Big B, Ramdev extend support to Hazare's crusade – Times of India". The Times of India. 8 April 2011.
- "Bollywood resonates with Anna Hazare". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 9 April 2011.
- Central Chronicle – Madhya Pradesh's News Portal[dead link]
- "B'wood continues to support Anna Hazare". Ibnlive.in.com. 8 April 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- [dead link]
- "Logjam over Lokpal bill continues". rediff.com. 21 June 2011.
- RADHIKA RAMASESHAN (22 June 2011). "DMK iffy on Lokpal, allies back govt Hazare wags fast finger".
- "Dalits to rally for Bahujan Lokpal Bill". Hindustan Times. 24 August 2011. Retrieved 24 August 2011.
- Team Anna's Arvind Kejriwal rejects
- Team Anna wants "best possible" anti-corruption law
- No vote on Lokpal, Rajya Sabha adjourns abruptly
- "Of the few, by the few version". The Indian Express. 7 April 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- Jan Lokpal a Frankenstein's monster: Sibal, Abantika Ghosh, TNN, 30 June 2011, NEW DELHI, THE TIMES OF INDIA
- Kattakayam, Jiby (7 April 2011). "I will fight till death: Anna Hazare". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 12 April 2011.
- Jan Lokpal Bill version 1.8, annahazare.org
- "Opinion: Jan Lokpal bill: addressing concerns". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 15 April 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- Parsai, Gargi (24 May 2011). "Lokpal panel postpones sticky issues". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- Full text: The Jan Lokpal Bill, ibnlive.com, 7 April 2011
- Full details Jan Lokpal Bill – Draft, Saturday, 9 April 2011, e-news4u.com
- Lokpal Bill, Jan Lokpal Bill version 1.8,
- Dhananjay Mahapatra (27 June 2011). "Can Lokpal be investigator, prosecutor, jury and judge?". The Times of India.
- "Hazare proposes Justices Verma, Hegde as chairman of Lokpal Bill panel". Indian Express. 8 April 2011.
- "Judiciary, PM should not be under Lokpal: Former CJI". Malayala Manorama. 26 June 2011.
- Sharma, Nagendar (15 August 2011). "Break lokpal into 5 institutions: Roy". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
- I'd rather not be Anna, The Hindu, 21 August 2011
- Jan Lokpal Bill regressive: Arundhati Roy The Hindu, 30 August 2011
- Anna's fast will not help solve crisis: Roy The Hindu, 22 August 20111
- "Functioning of Lokpal and the CBI:- Need for Synergy". CBI.
- "CBI still awaits sanctions to initiate criminal proceedings".
- "Press Release – Team Anna's Referendum". NDTV. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Referendum Results – India Against Corruption". India Against Corruption. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- Two-thirds of India hasn’t heard of Lokpal: Survey, FP Editors, 9 August 2011, Firstpost
- "Current Lokpal Bill is a Sham". India Today. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Congress MPs Dattu Meghe. Priya Dutt Support Jan Lokpal Bill". News Worms. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "MP Priya Dutt, Nirupam meet Hazare Supporters; Vow support". Times of India. 22 August 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Congress MP submits Jan Lokpal Bill before parliamentary Panel". IBN Live. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Varun Gandhi to introduce Jan Lokpal Bill in Parliament". Times of India. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Jan Lokpal Bill: Anna Hazare hooks millions into the cyber space, tops film superstar Shahrukh Khan in Google search results". Economic Times. 22 August 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Anna's campaign big hit on YouTube, Facebook & Twitter; unites Netizens". Economic Times. 17 August 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Hazare's team launches website for campaign publicity". IANS. Retrieved 13 August 2011.
- "87pc Indians support Jan Lokpal: STAR News-Nielsen Survey". Exchange4Media News. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- "Over a million join TOI anti-graft drive". Times of India. 21 August 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- Agreed! says Parliament to Anna; fast ends at 10 am, NDTV Correspondent, 27 August 2011
- Anna Hazare wins, Parliament passes resolution on Lokpal Bill, TNN, 27 August 2011, THE TIMES OF INDIA
- PM's letter to Anna Hazare on Parliament accepting his conditions, NDTV Correspondent, 27 August 2011
- Text of Parliament resolution on Anna's demands, NDTV Correspondent, 27 August 2011
- Loksatta – Photo of Lokpal Round table FDR Foundation for Democratic 24th April 2011,
- Loksatta – List of attendees of Round Table on Lokpal 24th April 2011,
- India Against Corruption
- India Against Corruption
- Final Version 2.3 under official consideration – redrafted by Ramarao Veluri, available on Govt of India website
- Jan Lokpal Bill – Activists proposed version