Mankind Quarterly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with the Australian anthropological journal The Australian Journal of Anthropology formerly known as "Mankind".
Mankind Quarterly  
Abbreviated title (ISO 4)
Mank. Q.
Discipline Anthropology
Language English
Edited by Peter Boev, Brunetto Chiarelli, Richard Lynn, and Gerhard Meisenberg
Publication details
Publisher
Publication history
1960-present
Frequency Quarterly
Indexing
ISSN 0025-2344
LCCN 63024971
CODEN MKQUA4
OCLC no. 820324
Links
Mankind Quarterly Monographs  
Abbreviated title (ISO 4)
Mank. Q. Monogr.
Discipline Anthropology
Language English
Publication details
Publisher
Indexing
ISSN 0893-4649
LCCN sf89030002
CODEN MAQUE6
OCLC no. 149980257

The Mankind Quarterly is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to physical and cultural anthropology and is published by the Council for Social and Economic Studies in Washington, D.C. It contains articles on human evolution, intelligence, ethnography, linguistics, mythology, archaeology, etc. The journal aims to unify anthropology with biology.

It has been called a "cornerstone of the scientific racism establishment" and a "white supremacist journal",[1] "scientific racism's keepers of the flame",[2] a journal with a "racist orientation" and an "infamous racist journal",[3] and "journal of 'scientific racism'".[4]

Its foundation in 1960 may in part have been a response to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education which ordered the desegregation of schools in the United States.[5][6] It was originally published in Edinburgh, Scotland, by the International Association for the Advancement of Ethnology and Eugenics.

The founders were Robert Gayre, Henry Garrett, Roger Pearson, Corrado Gini, Ottmar von Verschuer and Reginald Ruggles Gates.

Editors[edit]

The editors-in-chief are Peter Boev (Sofia, Bulgaria), Brunetto Chiarelli (Florence, Italy), Richard Lynn (Bristol, England), and Gerhard Meisenberg (Dominica).

Criticism[edit]

Many of those who constitute the publication's contributors, Board of Directors, and publishers are connected to the academic hereditarian tradition. The journal has been criticized by some as being political and strongly right-leaning,[7] racist or fascist.[8][9] The publisher counters that much of Anthropology is 'politicised' in the opposite way and that those who count amongst the most vocal critics of the journal often identify with the Radical tradition in Anthropology.[10] The editorial practice has been criticised as biased and misleading.[11]

During the "Bell Curve wars" of the 1990s, the journal received attention when opponents of The Bell Curve publicized the fact that some of the works cited by Bell Curve authors Herrnstein and Murray had first been published in Mankind Quarterly.[12] In the New York Review of Books, Charles Lane referred to The Bell Curve's "tainted sources," noting that seventeen researchers cited in the book's bibliography had contributed articles to, and ten of these seventeen had also been editors of, Mankind Quarterly, "a notorious journal of 'racial history' founded, and funded, by men who believe in the genetic superiority of the white race."[13] The journal stands by its tradition of publishing hereditarian perspective articles to this day, stating that "...this science has stood the test of time, and MQ is still prepared to publish controversial findings and theories".[14] Pearson received over a million dollars in grants from the Pioneer Fund in the eighties and the nineties.[12][15]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Joe L. Kincheloe, et. al, Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined, Palgrave Macmillan, 1997, pg. 39
  2. ^ William H. Tucker, The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer Fund, University of Illinois Press, 2002, pg. 2
  3. ^ Ibrahim G. Aoudé, The ethnic studies story: politics and social movements in Hawaiʻi, University of Hawaii Press, 1999 , pg. 111
  4. ^ Kenneth Leech, Race, Church Publishing, Inc., 2005, pg. 14
  5. ^ Schaffer, Gavin "‘Scientific’ Racism Again?”:1 Reginald Gates, the Mankind Quarterly and the Question of “Race” in Science after the Second World War Journal of American Studies (2007), 41: 253-278 Cambridge University Press
  6. ^ Jackson, John P. (2005). Science for Segregation: Race, Law, and the Case against Brown v. Board of Education. NYU Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-4271-6. Lay summary (30 August 2010). 
  7. ^ e.g., Arvidsson, Stefan (2006), Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science, translated by Sonia Wichmann, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  8. ^ Schaffer, Gavin (2008). Racial science and British society, 1930-62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 
  9. ^ Gelb, Steven A. (1997). "Heart of Darkness: The Discreet Charm of the Hereditarian Psychologist". The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies 19 (1): 129–139. 
  10. ^ Roger Pearson, "Activist Lysenkoism: The Case of Barry Mehler." In Race, Intelligence and Bias in Academe (Washington: Scott-Townsend Publishers, 1997).
  11. ^ Ehrenfels, U. R., Madan, T. N., & Comas, J. (1962). "Mankind Quarterly Under Heavy Criticism: 3 Comments on Editorial Practicesjournal=Current Anthropology" 3 (2). pp. 154–158. 
  12. ^ a b Tucker, William H. (2007). The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer Fund. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-07463-9. Lay summary (4 September 2010). 
  13. ^ "The Bell Curve" and Its Sources, Harry F. Weyher, reply by Charles Lane
  14. ^ http://www.mankindquarterly.org/about.html
  15. ^ Mehler, Barry (July 7, 1998). Race Science and the Pioneer Fund Originally published as "The Funding of the Science" in Searchlight, No. 277.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]