|LC Class||ML3830 .S13 2007|
|Preceded by||Oaxaca Journal (2002)|
|Followed by||The Mind's Eye (2010)|
In a review for The Washington Post, Peter D. Kramer wrote, "In Musicophilia, Sacks turns to the intersection of music and neurology -- music as affliction and music as treatment." Kramer wrote, "Lacking the dynamic that propels Sacks's other work, Musicophilia threatens to disintegrate into a catalogue of disparate phenomena." Kramer went on to say, "What makes Musicophilia cohere is Sacks himself. He is the book's moral argument. Curious, cultured, caring, in his person Sacks justifies the medical profession and, one is tempted to say, the human race." Kramer concluded his review by writing, "Sacks is, in short, the ideal exponent of the view that responsiveness to music is intrinsic to our makeup. He is also the ideal guide to the territory he covers. Musicophilia allows readers to join Sacks where he is most alive, amid melodies and with his patients."
Musicophilia was listed as one of the best books of 2007 by The Washington Post.
- "NPR : Via 'Musicophilia,' Sacks Studies Music and the Brain". NPR, All Things Considered. 2007-10-21. Retrieved 2007-12-26.
- Peter D. Kramer (2007-10-28). "Melodies and Maladies". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-12-26.
- "Book World's Holiday Issue". The Washington Post. 2007-12-02. Retrieved 2007-12-26.
- Official site
- Musicophilia at author's website
- Wunderbar review of Musicophilia by Anna Goldsworthy in The Monthly, December 2007
|This article about a book on neuroscience is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|