Music and emotion
||This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (April 2010)|
Many scientific disciplines deal with the topic of music and emotion, including philosophy, musicology and psychology. The perspective presented here is mainly a psychological one, yet some theoretical and philosophical considerations will be made to clarify prevailing concepts about music and emotions and how they can be connected.
- 1 Expressiveness of music – philosophical problems
- 2 Psychological methods
- 3 Conveying emotion through music
- 3.1 Structural features
- 3.2 Performance features
- 3.3 Listener features
- 3.4 Contextual features
- 3.5 Specific listener features
- 4 Eliciting emotion through music
- 5 Comparison of conveyed and elicited emotions
- 6 Nature of musical emotions (some aspects)
- 7 References
Expressiveness of music – philosophical problems
Claiming that music is expressive of emotions and that it can elicit emotions in the listener does not seem highly disputable at first glance. However, this claim gives rise to a number of questions.
- How can a piece of music (when we consider purely instrumental music without any vocals, text or title) appear emotional, as a piece of music is no psychological agent?
- Why would we respond emotionally to music knowing that there is nobody undergoing the emotion expressed?
- What are psychological mechanisms that lead to the emotional reaction in the listener?
- What is the nature of these emotions?
The first question deals with how emotions are transported in the music, questions 2-4 with emotions in the listener. (Not mentioned here are emotions in the composer or the performer.) However, perceiving a piece of music as to be emotional and being moved by this emotion mostly go in hand.
We don’t find it hard to explain why and how we respond emotionally to something expressing an emotion, e.g. a person expressing joy or sadness (or indirectly to an event like an earthquake that affects people as to express an emotion, which ends up being the same). A stone rarely moves us to tears, so why would music do that? Thus, the core of this problem is the question how music can be expressive at all. The field of aesthetics examine this problem.
Two of the most influential philosophers in the aesthetics of music are Stephen Davies and Jerrold Levinson. Without going into the depths of the philosophical argument, this view mainly follows Davies’ position. He terms his concept the expressiveness of emotions in music appearance emotionalism. Appearance emotionalism holds that music is for example sad in the same way the posture of a person is sad or a weeping willow is sad. A piece of music is not sad because it feels sadness, but because it expresses sadness, it is sad in appearance.
Why does something (that is not a person) appear sad? Because we can identify in its structure certain characteristics that we know from a person’s expression of sadness. We would sometimes call an old hunchbacked lady sad (although we don’t doubt that she might feel completely differently) because she looks like someone sad we’ve already seen. In the same way we would call a piece of music sad because its dynamic character resembles a person’s expression of sadness. “The resemblance that counts most for music’s expressiveness […] is between music’s temporally unfolding dynamic structure and configurations of human behaviour associated with the expression of emotion.” If a person does not give verbal account of his or her feelings, the observer can still note them from the person’s posture, gait, gestures, attitude, and comportment. Music recalls an appearance of sadness e.g., according to Davies, by a slow and quiet downward movement, underlying patterns of unresolved tension, dark timbre, heavy or thick harmonic bass textures.
Not everybody associates the same musical features with the same emotion. Appearance emotionalism does not claim that movement in music generally resembles human behaviour but that many listeners have this perception of similarity, and that this is the crucial connection that constitutes the expressiveness of music. This perception of similarity can be widely common among listeners or highly individual. Which musical features are more commonly associated with certain emotions is left over to the testing of music psychology (see next paragraph). Davies claims that expressiveness is an objective property of music and not subjective in the sense of being projected into the music by the listener. Music’s expressiveness is certainly response-dependent, i.e. it is realized in the listener’s judgement. However, suitably skilled listeners display a high degree of agreement in attributing emotional expressiveness to a certain piece of music. Although this is an empirical finding, it indicates according to Davies (2006) that the expressiveness of music has to be somewhat objective. If there was no expressiveness in the music, no expression could be projected into it as a reaction to the music.
The process theory
In contrast to Stephen Davies, the philosopher Jenefer Robinson takes the existence of a mutual dependence between cognition and elicitation as a basis for her ‘emotions as process, music as process’ theory (or ‘process’ theory). Robinson argues that the process of emotional elicitation begins with an ‘automatic, immediate response that initiates motor and autonomic activity and prepares us for possible action’. After this initial response, a process of cognition results which may ultimately lead to our ability to ‘name’ the felt emotion. This series of events is a process; a process which is in continual exchange with new, incoming information. Robinson's argument is that emotions may transform into one another, causing blends, conflicts, and ambiguities that make it difficult for us to describe in a single word the emotional state we may be experiencing at any given moment; instead, our inner feelings are better thought of as the products of multiple emotional ‘streams’. Robinson argues that music is itself a series of processes going on simultaneously, and is thus an ideal medium for mirroring the more ‘cognitive’ aspects of emotion, such as in those instances where musical themes ‘desire’ to achieve resolution or, in the case of leitmotif, where the music mirrors memory processes. These simultaneous musical processes can reinforce or conflict with each other, and thus also express the way one emotion ‘morphs into another over time’.
The expressive qualities of music have been studied for years, the foremost of which has been the expression of emotion. Studies have shown that music is not only emotionally expressive but that there is high agreement among listeners about what type of emotion is being expressed. Psychologists study how music conveys or elicits emotions using one primary method. Clips of music are chosen based on certain structural features that are known to convey certain emotions. Participants listen to these clips and make judgments about the emotions they elicit or convey either during or directly after the clip. Many differing scales are used; however, a bipolar happy-sad scale is the most common scale given immediately after the clip to adults, and a choice between four emotions is the most common given to children. In studies on music that conveys or elicits mixed emotions, bipolar scales are separated so emotions like happiness and sadness are judged independently. When participants are asked to make judgments while listening to the music clips, they press one button for when the music is sad, and another when the music is happy, or both when responses are mixed.
Conveying emotion through music
The ability to perceive conveyed emotion is said to develop early in childhood, and improve significantly throughout development. Empirical research has looked at which emotions can be conveyed as well as what structural factors in music help contribute to the perceived emotional expression. There are two schools of thought on how we interpret emotion in music. The cognitivists' approach argues that music simply displays an emotion, but does not allow for the personal experience of emotion in the listener. Emotivists argue that music elicits real emotional responses in the listener.
It has been argued that the emotion experienced from a piece of music is a multiplicative function of structural features, performance features, listener features and contextual features of the piece, shown as:
Experienced Emotion = Structural features x Performance features x Listener features x Contextual features
Structural features = Segmental features x Suprasegmental features
Performance features = Performer skill x Performer state
Listener features = Musical expertise x Stable disposition x Current motivation
Contextual features = Location x Event
Structural features are divided into two parts, segmental features and suprasegmental features. Segmental features are the individual sounds or tones that make up the music; this includes acoustic structures such as duration, amplitude, and pitch. Suprasegmental features are the foundational structures of a piece, such as melody, tempo and rhythm.
Specific structural features
There are a number of specific musical features that are highly associated with particular emotions. Within the factors affecting emotional expression in music, tempo is typically regarded as the most important, but a number of other factors, such as mode, loudness, and melody, also influence the emotional valence of the piece.
Tempo is the speed or pace of a musical piece. Studies indicate an association between fast tempo and happiness or excitement (or even anger). Slow tempo may be associated with sadness or serenity.
Mode, or the major or minor tonality in a piece often indicates happiness or sadness. Major tonality often conveys happiness or joy, while minor tonality is associated with sadness.
Loudness, or the physical strength and amplitude of a sound, may be perceived as intensity, power, or anger; while soft music is associated with , sadness, or fear. Rapid changes in loudness may connote playfulness or pleading, whereas few or no changes can indicate peace and sadness.
In melody, a wide range of notes can imply joy, whimsicality, or uneasiness; a narrow range suggests tranquillity, sadness, or triumph. Consonant, or complementing harmonies, are connected with feelings of happiness, relaxation, or serenity; dissonant, or clashing harmonies may imply excitement, anger, or unpleasantness.
Rhythm is the regularly recurring pattern or beat of a song. A smooth, consistent rhythm may be associated with happiness and peace. A rough, irregular rhythm may be associated with amusement and uneasiness, while varied rhythm implies joy.
Performance features refers to the manner in which a piece of music is executed by the performer(s). These are broken into two categories, performer skills and performer state. Performer skills are the compound ability and appearance of the performer; including physical appearance, reputation and technical skills. The performer state is the interpretation, motivation, and stage presence of the performer.
Listener features refers to the individual and social identity of the listener(s). This includes their personality, knowledge of music, and motivation to listen to the music.
Contextual features are aspects of the performance such as the location and the particular occasion for the performance (i.e., funeral, wedding, dance).
These different factors influence expressed emotion at different magnitudes, and their effects are compounded by one another. Thus, experienced emotion is felt to a stronger degree if more factors are present. The order the factors are listed within the model denotes how much weight in the equation they carry. For this reason, the bulk of research has been done in structural features and listener features.
Which emotion is perceived is dependent on the context of the piece of music. Past research has argued that opposing emotions like happiness and sadness fall on a bipolar scale, where both cannot be felt at the same time. More recent research has suggested that happiness and sadness are experienced separately, which implies that they can be felt concurrently. One study investigated the latter possibility by having participants listen to computer-manipulated musical excerpts that have mixed cues between tempo and mode. Examples of mix-cue music include a piece with major key and slow tempo, and a minor-chord piece with a fast tempo. Participants then rated the extent to which the piece conveyed happiness or sadness. The results indicated that mixed-cue music conveys both happiness and sadness; however, it remained unclear whether participants perceived happiness and sadness simultaneously or vacillated between these two emotions. A follow up study was done to examine these possibilities. While listening to mixed or consistent cue music, participants pressed one button when the music conveyed happiness, and another button when it conveyed sadness. The results revealed that subjects pressed both buttons simultaneously during songs with conflicting cues. These findings indicate that listeners can perceive both happiness and sadness concurrently. This has significant implications for how the structural features influence emotion, because when a mix of structural cues is used, a number of emotions may be conveyed.
Specific listener features
Studies indicate that the ability to understand emotional messages in music starts early, and improves throughout child development. Studies investigating music and emotion in children primarily play a musical excerpt for children and have them look at pictorial expressions of faces. These facial expressions display different emotions and children are asked to select the face that best matches the music's emotional tone. Studies have shown that children are able to assign specific emotions to pieces of music; however, there is debate regarding what age this ability begins.
An infant is often exposed to a mother’s speech that is musical in nature. It is possible that this motherly singing allows the mother to relay emotional messages to the infant. Infants also tend to prefer positive speech to neutral speech as well as happy music to negative music. It has also been posited that listening to their mother’s singing may play a role in identity formation. This hypothesis is supported by a study that interviewed adults and asked them to describe musical experiences from their childhood. Findings showed that music was good for developing knowledge of emotions during childhood. The role of the mother in emotional development of the child goes beyond the singing that the child receives in infancy. It has been shown that mothers that explain the emotions of others to their children during preschool allows the child to be more sensitive to the emotions of those around them. Therefore, the mother’s role in the emotional development of the child begins in infancy but will extend well into childhood.
These studies have shown that children at the age of 4 are able to begin to distinguish between emotions found in musical excerpts in ways that are similar to adults. The ability to distinguish these musical emotions seems to increase with age until adulthood. However, children at the age of 3 were unable to make the distinction between emotions expressed in music through matching a facial expression with the type of emotion found in the music. Some emotions, such as anger and fear, were also found to be harder to distinguish within music.
In studies with four-year-olds and five-year-olds, they are asked to label musical excerpts with the affective labels "happy", "sad", "angry", and "afraid". Results in one study showed that four-year-olds did not perform above chance with the labels "sad" and "angry", and the five-year-olds did not perform above chance with the label "afraid". A follow-up study found conflicting results, where five-year-olds performed much like adults. However, all ages confused categorizing "angry" and "afraid". Pre-school and elementary-age children listened to twelve short melodies, each in either major or minor mode, and were instructed to choose between four pictures of faces: happy, contented, sad, and angry. All the children, even as young as three years old, performed above chance in assigning positive faces with major mode and negative faces with minor mode.
Different people perceive events differently based upon their individual characteristics. Similarly, the emotions elicited by listening to different types of music seem to be affected by factors such as personality and previous musical training. People with the personality type of agreeableness have been found to have higher emotional responses to music in general. Stronger sad feelings have also associated with people with personality types of agreeableness and neuroticism. While some studies have shown that musical training can be correlated with music that evoked mixed feelings as well as higher IQ and test of emotional comprehension scores, other studies refute the claim that musical training affects perception of emotion in music. It is also worth noting that previous exposure to music can affect later behavioral choices, schoolwork, and social interactions. Therefore, previous music exposure does seem to have an effect on the personality and emotions of a child later in their life, and would subsequently affect their ability to perceive as well as express emotions during exposure to music. Gender, however, has not been shown to lead to a difference in perception of emotions found in music. Further research into which factors affect an individual’s perception of emotion in music and the ability of the individual to have music-induced emotions are needed.
Eliciting emotion through music
Along with the research that music conveys an emotion to its listener(s), it has also been shown that music can produce emotion in the listener(s). This view often causes debate because the emotion is produced within the listener; and thus, hard to measure. In spite of this controversy, studies have shown observable responses to elicited emotions, which reinforces the Emotivists' view that music does elicit real emotional responses.
Responses to elicited emotion
The structural features of music not only help convey an emotional message to the listener, but also may create emotion in the listener. These emotions can be completely new feelings or may be an extension of previous emotional events. Empirical research has shown how listeners can absorb the piece's expression as their own emotion, as well as invoke a unique response based on their personal experiences.
In research on eliciting emotion, participants report personally feeling a certain emotion in response to hearing a musical piece. Researchers have investigated whether the same structures that conveyed a particular emotion could elicit it as well. The researchers presented excerpts of fast tempo, major mode music and slow tempo, minor tone music to participants; these musical structures were chosen because they are known to convey happiness and sadness respectively. Participants rated their own emotions with elevated levels of happiness after listening to music with structures that convey happiness and elevated sadness after music with structures that convey sadness. This evidence suggests that the same structures that convey emotions in music can also elicit those same emotions in the listener.
In light of this finding, there has been particular controversy about music eliciting negative emotions. Cognitivists argue that choosing to listen to music that elicits negative emotions like sadness would be paradoxical, as listeners would not willingly strive to induce sadness. However, emotivists purport that music does elicit negative emotions, and listeners knowingly choose to listen in order to feel sadness in an impersonal way, similar to a viewer's desire to watch a tragic film. The reasons why people sometimes listen to sad music when feeling sad has been explored by means of interviewing people about their motivations for doing so. As a result of this research it has indeed been found that people sometimes listen to sad music when feeling sad to intensify feelings of sadness. Other reasons for listening to sad music when feeling sad were; in order to retrieve memories, to feel closer to other people, for cognitive re-appraisal, to feel befriended by the music, to distract oneself, and for mood enhancement.
Researchers have also found an effect between one's familiarity with a piece of music and the emotions it elicits. In one study, half of participants were played twelve random musical excerpts one time, and rated their emotions after each piece. The other half of the participants listened to twelve random excerpts five times, and started their ratings on the third repetition. Findings showed that participants who listened to the excerpts five times rated their emotions with higher intensity than the participants who listened to them only once. This suggests that familiarity with a piece of music increases the emotions experienced by the listener.
Emotional memories and actions
Music may not only elicit new emotions, but connect listeners with other emotional sources. Music serves as a powerful cue to recall emotional memories back into awareness. Because music is such a pervasive part of social life, present in weddings, funerals and religious ceremonies, it brings back emotional memories that are often already associated with it. Music is also processed by the lower, sensory levels of the brain, making it impervious to later memory distortions. Therefore creating a strong connection between emotion and music within memory makes it easier to recall one when prompted by the other. Music can also tap into empathy, inducing emotions that are assumed to be felt by the performer or composer. Listeners can become sad because they recognize that those emotions must have been felt by the composer, much as the viewer of a play can empathize for the actors.
Listeners may also respond to emotional music through action. Throughout history music was composed to inspire people into specific action - to march, dance, sing or fight. Consequently, heightening the emotions in all these events. In fact, many people report being unable to sit still when certain rhythms are played, in some cases even engaging in subliminal actions when physical manifestations should be suppressed. Examples of this can be seen in young children's spontaneous outbursts into motion upon hearing music, or exuberant expressions shown at concerts.
Juslin & Västfjäll's BRECVEM model
Brain Stem Reflex: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is induced by music because one or more fundamental acoustical characteristics of the music are taken by the brain stem to signal a potentially important and urgent event. All other things being equal, sounds that are sudden, loud, dissonant, or feature fast temporal patterns induce arousal or feelings of unpleasantness in listeners...Such responses reflect the impact of auditory sensations – music as sound in the most basic sense.'
Rhythmic Entrainment: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is evoked by a piece of music because a powerful, external rhythm in the music influences some internal bodily rhythm of the listener (e.g. heart rate), such that the latter rhythm adjusts toward and eventually 'locks in' to a common periodicity. The adjusted heart rate can then spread to other components of emotion such as feeling, through proprioceptive feedback. This may produce an increased level of arousal in the listener.'
Evaluative Conditioning: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is induced by a piece of music simply because this stimulus has been paired repeatedly with other positive or negative stimuli. Thus, for instance, a particular piece of music may have occurred repeatedly together in time with a specific event that always made you happy (e.g., meeting your best friend). Over time, through repeated pairings, the music will eventually come to evoke happiness even in the absence of the friendly interaction.'
Emotional Contagion: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is induced by a piece of music because the listener perceives the emotional expression of the music, and then “mimics” this expression internally, which by means of either peripheral feedback from muscles, or a more direct activation of the relevant emotional representations in the brain, leads to an induction of the same emotion.'
Visual Imagery: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is induced in a listener because he or she conjures up visual images (e.g., of a beautiful landscape) while listening to the music.'
Episodic memory: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is induced in a listener because the music evokes a memory of a particular event in the listener’s life. This is sometimes referred to as the “Darling, they are playing our tune” phenomenon.'
Musical expectancy: 'This refers to a process whereby an emotion is induced in a listener because a specific feature of the music violates, delays, or confirms the listener’s expectations about the continuation of the music.'
Comparison of conveyed and elicited emotions
Evidence for emotion in music
There has been a bulk of evidence that listeners can identify specific emotions with certain types of music, but there has been less concrete evidence that music may elicit emotions. This is due to the fact that elicited emotion is subjective; and thus, it is difficult to find a valid criterion to study it. Elicited and conveyed emotion in music is usually understood from three types of evidence: self-report, physiological responses, and expressive behavior. Researchers use one or a combination of these methods to investigate emotional reactions to music.
The self-report method is a verbal report by the listener regarding what they are experiencing. This is the most widely used method for studying emotion and has shown that people identify emotions and personally experience emotions while listening to music. Research in the area has shown that listeners' emotional responses are highly consistent. In fact, a meta-analysis of 41 studies on music performance found that happiness, sadness, tenderness, threat, and anger were identified above chance by listeners. Another study compared untrained listeners to musically trained listeners. Both groups were required to categorize musical excerpts that conveyed similar emotions. The findings showed that the categorizations were not different between the trained and untrained; thus demonstrating that the untrained listeners are highly accurate in perceiving emotion. It is more difficult to find evidence for elicited emotion, as it depends solely on the subjective response of the listener. This leaves reporting vulnerable to self-report biases such as participants responding according to social prescriptions or responding as they think the experimenter wants them to. As a result, the validity of the self-report method is often questioned, and consequently researchers are reluctant to draw definitive conclusions solely from these reports.
Emotions are known to create physiological, or bodily, changes in a person, which can be tested experimentally. Some evidence shows one of these changes is within the nervous system. Arousing music is related to increased heart rate and muscle tension; calming music is connected to decreased heart rate and muscle tension, and increased skin temperature. Other research identifies outward physical responses such as shivers or goose bumps to be caused by changes in harmony and tears or lump-in-the-throat provoked by changes in melody. Researchers test these responses through the use of instruments for physiological measurement, such as recording pulse rate.
People are also known to show outward manifestations of their emotional states while listening to music. Studies using facial electromyography (EMG) have found that people react with subliminal facial expressions when listening to expressive music. In addition, music provides a stimulus for expressive behavior in many social contexts, such as concerts, dances, and ceremonies. Although these expressive behaviors can be measured experimentally, there have been very few controlled studies observing this behavior.
Strength of effects
Within the comparison between elicited and conveyed emotions, researchers have examined the relationship between these two types of responses to music. In general, research agrees that feeling and perception ratings are highly correlated, but not identical. More specifically, studies are inconclusive as to whether one response has a stronger effect than the other, and in what ways these two responses relate.
Conveyed more than elicited
In one study, participants heard a random selection of 24 excerpts, displaying six types of emotions, five times in a row. Half the participants described the emotions the music conveyed, and the other half responded with how the music made them feel. The results found that emotions conveyed by music were more intense than the emotions elicited by the same piece of music. Another study investigated under what specific conditions strong emotions were conveyed. Findings showed that ratings for conveyed emotions were higher in happy responses to music with consistent cues for happiness (i.e., fast tempo and major mode), for sad responses to music with consistent cues for sadness (i.e., slow tempo and minor mode,) and for sad responses in general. These studies suggest that people can recognize the emotion displayed in music more readily than feeling it personally.
Sometimes conveyed, sometimes elicited
Another study that had 32 participants listen to twelve musical pieces and found that the strength of perceived and elicited emotions were dependent on the structures of the piece of music. Perceived emotions were stronger than felt emotions when listeners rated for arousal and positive and negative activation. On the other hand, elicited emotions were stronger than perceived emotions when rating for pleasantness.
Elicited more than conveyed
In another study analysis revealed that emotional responses were stronger than the listeners' perceptions of emotions. This study used a between-subjects design, where 20 listeners judged to what extent they perceived four emotions: happy, sad, peaceful, and scared. A separate 19 listeners rated to what extent they experienced each of these emotions. The findings showed that all music stimuli elicited specific emotions for the group of participants rating elicited emotion, while music stimuli only occasionally conveyed emotion to the participants in the group identifying which emotions the music conveyed. Based on these inconsistent findings, there is much research left to be done in order to determine how conveyed and elicited emotions are similar and different. There is disagreement about whether music induces ‘true’ emotions or if the emotions reported as felt in studies are instead just participants stating the emotions found in the music they are listening to.
Nature of musical emotions (some aspects)
The last problem to be considered here is the nature of the emotions elicited by music. Take the kind of sadness one may feel hearing the Rachmaninoff’s second piano concerto. The listener in this case feels a different kind of sadness than for loss of a loved person. He neither feels regret for the music as for an unfortunate event, nor compassion for a sentient being experiencing tragedy. Juslin and Västfjäll (2008) state that the listener’s emotional reaction lacks the cognitive appraisal of a “real” emotion, i.e. the subjective evaluation of an event, in this case the music, in relation to goals and needs of the individual. This led some theorists to the conclusion that music does not elicit emotions at all or that music can only elicit moods, i.e. affective states with lower intensity than emotions and without a clear object (cf. Juslin and Västfjäll 2008). Stephen Davies rejects this view. Although the emotional response does not take the music as its intentional object, music is the “perceptional object and the cause for this response”. The listener’s response of sadness is “not about the music, but to the music” (Davies 2006). The emotion enfolds over the course of the music and as a consequence of it. Juslin and Västfjäll (2008)compiled evidence that most of the psychological processes that lead to a real-life emotion can also be found in the emotional responses to music. These include subjective feeling, physiological arousal, brain activation, action tendency, and emotion regulation. Thus, they argue, music-induced emotions are of the same quality as “normal” emotions are, and do not just represent moods.
Still, emotions elicited by music have some characteristics that make them different from real-life emotions. Coming back to the example of the piano concerto, the sadness felt at hearing it does not only lack the regret of the sadness at the death of a loved person, but it is also certainly less intense. There seem to be emotional intensities of real-life events that the experience of an artwork cannot reach. In addition, most emotions, particularly the negative ones, felt when listening to music seem to have a positive tinge. Why do we seek the experience of a negative emotion as in a sad piece of music? One reason is that we appreciate, in an artistic, aesthetic way, the music as an artwork that manages to create the expressiveness. Another reason is given by Kendall Walton (see http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/music/): Sadness is not negative in itself. Rather the life situation that causes it, e.g. the death of a loved person, is negative. “Thus, though we would not seek out the death of a loved one, given the death we ‘welcome’ the sorrow.” Music gives the listener the possibility of self-experience through real emotions, without the consequences of real-life circumstances, just as any art and play does. This is exemplified in a study where sad music was found to induce sadness associated effects on memory and judgment but the effects were at least somewhat dependent upon the music’s relevance to the listener as well as the listener’s personality. Participants scoring high in trait empathy reported sadness associated emotions from sad music. Listening to sad music was more pleasant than recalling sad autobiographical memories, leading back to the idea that we are more likely to enjoy the experience of real emotions without the costliness of real-life circumstances.
==Music as a Therapeutic Tool==sd Music-induced emotions have shown promise as therapeutic tool (music therapy) for various ailments. There is disagreement about whether music induces ‘true’ emotions or if the emotions reported as felt in studies are instead just participants stating the emotions found in the music they are listening to. Further research into a person’s psychological and physiological responses to music should be determined in order to further develop our ability to use music as a therapeutic tool.
For drug users
Research suggests that music therapy sessions may have the ability to help drug users who are attempting to break a drug habit. After a music therapy session, drug users reported being able to better feel emotions without the aid of drug use.
For hospitalized patients
Music therapy may also be a viable option for people experiencing extended stays in a hospital due to illness. Research has shown that music therapy gave child oncology patients greater environmental support elements as well as caused them to elicit more engaging behaviors.
For those with autism
Music may serve as an emotional outlet for people with autism. While other avenues of emotional expression and understanding may be difficult for people with autism, music may provide those with limited understanding of socio-emotional cues a way of accessing emotion. However, children suffering from language impairment have been shown to be unsuccessful at distinguishing emotions from musical excerpts. Instead, these children were more successful at distinguishing emotions based on visual cues such as photographs of faces displaying particular emotions.
- Cf. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/music/
- Davies, S. (2006). "Artistic Expression and the Hard Case of Pure Music", in: Kieran, M. (Ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: 179-91.
- Davies 2006, p. 181.
- Davies 2006, p. 182.
- Jenefer Robinson, Deeper than Reason: Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music, and Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005; pp. 310-13
- Dowling, W. J. (2002). "The development of music perception and cognition". Foundations of Cognitive Psychology: Core Reading: 481–502.
- Scherer, K. R.; Zentner, M. R. (2001). "Emotional effects of music: production rules". Music and Emotion: Theory and Research: 361–387.
- Gabrielsson, A.; Lindstrom, E. (2001). "The influence of musical structure on emotional expression". Music and Emotion: Theory and Research: 223–243.
- Rigg, M. (1937). "An experiment to determine how accurately college students can interpret the intended meanings of musical compositions". Journal of Experimental Psychology 21: 223–229. doi:10.1037/h0056146.
- Hunter, P. G.; Schellenburg, E. G., & Schimmack, U. (2010). "Feelings and perceptions of happiness and sadness induced by music: Similarities, differences, and mixed emotions". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4: 47–56. doi:10.1037/a0016873.
- Larsen, J. T.; Stastny, B. J. (2011). "It's a bittersweet symphony: Simultaneously mixed emotional responses to music with conflicting cues". Emotion. doi:10.1037/a0024081.
- Radford, C. (1989). "Emotions and music: A reply to the cognitivists". The Journal of Aesthestics and Art Criticism 47: 69–76. JSTOR 431994.
- Hunter, P. G.; Schellenburg, E. G., & Schimmack, U. (2008). "Mixed affective responses to music with conflicting cues". Cognition and Emotion 22: 327–352. doi:10.1070/02699930701438145.
- Ali, S. O.; Peynircioglu, Z. F. (2010). "Intensity of emotions conveyed and elicited by familiar and unfamiliar music". Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 27: 177–182. doi:10.1525/MP.2010.27.3.177.
- Webster, G. D.; Weir, C. G. (2005). "Emotional responses to music: Interactive effects of mode, texture, and tempo". Motivation and Emotion 29: 19–39. doi:10.1007/s11031-005-4414-0.
- Sloboda, J. A.; Juslin, P. N. (2001). "Psychological perspectives on music and emotion". Music and Emotion: Theory and Research: 79–96.
- Nawrot, E. S. (1 January 2003). "The Perception of Emotional Expression in Music: Evidence from Infants, Children and Adults". Psychology of Music 31 (1): 75–92. doi:10.1177/0305735603031001325.
- Mote, Jasmine (1 January 2011). "The effects of tempo and familiarity on children's affective interpretation of music.". Emotion 11 (3): 618–622. doi:10.1037/a0022573.
- TERWOGT, MARK MEERUM; VAN GRINSVEN, FLORA (1 December 1988). "RECOGNITION OF EMOTIONS IN MUSIC BY CHILDREN AND ADULTS". Perceptual and Motor Skills 67 (3): 697–698. doi:10.2466/pms.1922.214.171.1247.
- Trehub, Sandra E.; Nakata,Takayuki (2001). "Emotion and music in infancy". Musicae Scientiae. SPEC ISSUE, 2001-2002: 37–61.
- Vist, Torill (16 November 2011). "Music Experience in Early Childhood: Potential for Emotion Knowledge?". International Journal of Early Childhood 43 (3): 277–290. doi:10.1007/s13158-011-0045-7.
- Garner, Pamela W. (1 January 1999). Motivation and Emotion 23 (4): 247–266. doi:10.1023/A:1021386725399.
- ROBAZZA, CLAUDIO; MACALUSO, CRISTINA; D'URSO, VALENTINA (1 October 1994). "EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO MUSIC BY GENDER, AGE, AND EXPERTISE". Perceptual and Motor Skills 79 (2): 939–944. doi:10.2466/pms.19126.96.36.1999.
- Ladinig, Olivia; Schellenberg, E. Glenn (1 January 2012). "Liking unfamiliar music: Effects of felt emotion and individual differences.". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 6 (2): 146–154. doi:10.1037/a0024671.
- Schellenberg, E. Glenn; Mankarious, Monika (1 January 2012). "Music training and emotion comprehension in childhood.". Emotion 12 (5): 887–891. doi:10.1037/a0027971. PMID 22642351.
- Vuoskoski, J. K.; Eerola, T. (13 July 2011). "Measuring music-induced emotion: A comparison of emotion models, personality biases, and intensity of experiences". Musicae Scientiae 15 (2): 159–173. doi:10.1177/1029864911403367.
- Kratus, J. (1 January 1993). "A Developmental Study of Children's Interpretation of Emotion in Music". Psychology of Music 21 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1177/030573569302100101.
- "Impact of Music, Music Lyrics, and Music Videos on Children and Youth". PEDIATRICS 124 (5): 1488–1494. 19 October 2009. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2145.
- Garrido, S.; E. Shubert (2011). "Individual differences in the enjoyment of negative emotion in music: a literature review and experiment". Music Perception 28: 279–295. doi:10.1525/MP.2011.28.3.279.
- Van den TOl, A.J.M.; Edwards, J. (2013). "Exploring a rationale for choosing to listen to sad music when feeling sad.". Psychology of Music.
- Patrik Juslin & Daniel V ̈astfj ̈all, ‘Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31, 2008; 559-621.
- Juslin, Liljeström, Västfjäll, & Lundqvist. (2010). How does music evoke emotions? Exploring the underlying mechanisms. In P.N. Juslin & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 605-642). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Juslin, P. (2011). Music and Emotion: seven questions, seven answers. In I. Deliège, J. Davidson, J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Music and the Mind: Essays in Honour of John Sloboda (pp.113-138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Davies, J. B. (1978). The psychology of music. Hutchinson.
- Vieillard, S.; Peretz, I., Gosselin, N., & Khalfa, S. (2008). "Happy, sad, scary, and peaceful musical excerpts for research on emotions". Cognition and Emotion 4: 720–752. doi:10.1080/02699930701503567.
- Gabrielsson, A. (2001). "Emotion in strong experiences with music". Music and Emotion: Theory and Research: 431–449.
- Kallenin, K; Ravaja, N. (2006). "Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same and different". Musicae Scientaie 10: 191–213. doi:10.1177/102986490601000203.
- Schubert, Emery (2007). "Locus of emotion: The effect of task order and age on emotion perceived and emotion felt in response to music". Journal of Music Therapy 44 (4): 344–368.
- Zentner, Marcel; Grandjean, Didier; Scherer, Klaus R. (1 January 2008). "Emotions evoked by the sound of music: Characterization, classification, and measurement.". Emotion 8 (4): 494–521. doi:10.1037/1528-35188.8.131.524.
- Vuoskoski, Jonna K.; Eerola, Tuomas (1 January 2012). "Can sad music really make you sad? Indirect measures of affective states induced by music and autobiographical memories.". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 6 (3): 204–213. doi:10.1037/a0026937.
- Vink, Annemiek (1 July 2001). "Music and Emotion". Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 10 (2): 144–158. doi:10.1080/08098130109478028.
- Baker, Felicity A.; Gleadhill, Libby M.; Dingle, Genevieve A. (1 January 2007). "Music therapy and emotional exploration: Exposing substance abuse clients to the experiences of non-drug-induced emotions". The Arts in Psychotherapy 34 (4): 321–330. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2007.04.005.
- Robb, Sheri L. (2000). "The effect of therapeutic music interventions on the behavior of hospitalized children in isolation: Developing a contextual support model of music therapy". Journal of Music Therapy 37 (2): 118–146.
- Heaton, Pam (2009). "Music - shelter for the frazzled mind?". The Psychologist 22 (12): 1018–1020.
- Spackman, M. P.; Fujiki, M.; Brinton, B.; Nelson, D.; Allen, J. (1 January 2005). "The Ability of Children With Language Impairment to Recognize Emotion Conveyed by Facial Expression and Music". Communication Disorders Quarterly 26 (3): 131–143. doi:10.1177/15257401050260030201.
This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Music and emotion", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.