Regulation and prevalence of homeopathy
||This article's lead section may not adequately summarize key points of its contents. (April 2013)|
Homeopathy is fairly common in some countries while being uncommon in others. In some countries, there are no specific legal regulations concerning the use of homeopathy, while in others, licenses or degrees in conventional medicine from accredited universities are required.
- 1 Europe
- 2 Australia
- 3 North America
- 4 South America
- 5 Middle East and Asia
- 6 Africa
- 7 See also
- 8 References
Regulations vary in Europe depending on the country. In Austria and Germany, no specific regulations exist, while France and Denmark mandate licenses to diagnose any illness or dispense of any product whose purpose is to treat any illness. Some homeopathic treatment is covered by the national insurance of several European countries, including France, some parts of the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Luxembourg. In other countries, such as Belgium and the Czech Republic, homeopathy is not covered. In Austria, public insurance requires scientific proof of effectiveness in order to reimburse medical treatments, but exceptions are made for homeopathy. In 2004, Germany which formerly offered homeopathy under its public health insurance scheme withdrew this privilege, with a few exceptions. In June 2005, the Swiss Government, after a 5-year trial, withdrew insurance coverage for homeopathy and four other alternative treatments, stating that they did not meet efficacy and cost-effectiveness criteria. However, following the result of a referendum in 2009 the five therapies were reinstated for a further 6-year trial period from 2012.
In 1992, the Council of the European Communities stated in the preamble to a directive that homeopathy was officially recognized in certain member states but only tolerated in others. In any case it was prescribed and used in all member states. To harmonize the market of homeopathic products, the council, by Directive 92/73/EEC directed the member states to implement certain changes in their national legislation. Directive 92/73/EEC was replaced by Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use.
Member states are required to ensure that homeopathic products (for oral or external use) can be registered without proof of therapeutic efficacy, provided that there is a sufficient degree of dilution to guarantee the safety of the product; in particular, the product may not contain either more than one part per 10,000 of the mother tincture or more than 1/100th of the smallest dose used in mainstream medicine, with regard to active principles whose presence in a medicinal product results in the obligation to submit a doctor's prescription. In other words, the dilution must be at least D4/4X/C2, and even higher in special cases. Other homeopathic products can still be registered under the normal rules, and products such as Arnica D1 are legally available.
The labels of homeopathic products registered without proof of efficacy must include the words "homeopathic medicinal product without approved therapeutic indications" as well as "a warning advising the user to consult a doctor if the symptoms persist during the use of the medicinal product".
In Belgium, the exercise of homeopathy is since May 12, 2014 reserved by law to only doctors, dentists and midwives, and should only be used for those indications for which the exercise is shown to be effective according to Evidence Based Medicine. The Belgian Council of Ministers agreed on July 12, 2013 with the draft royal decree as proposed by the Minister of Social Affairs and Public Health Laurette Onkelinx. The law follows the recommendations of the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre . who concluded on the basis of a systematic review of the scientific literature that there is no evidence that homeopathic treatments work better than a placebo. She advised against reimbursement by the compulsory health insurance and advised that only doctors would be allowed to practice homeopathy.
In Belgium, 81% of consultations in the area of alternative medicine involve homeopathy (not necessarily exclusively). Belgium has three homeopathic organizations for M.D.s and pharmacists and two for patients.
Homeopathy is the most popular form of alternative medicine in France. Its use rose from 16% of the population in 1982 to 29% in 1987 and 36% in 1992.
In Germany, the legislation for homeopathic remedies is as described above under European Union. Homeopathic remedies are subject to registration, but they need not be tested. (However, homeopathic remedies that are less diluted than D4, or for which a danger of adverse effects exists, cannot be registered under this rule.) They can be sold over-the-counter in pharmacies. Germany is the only member state of the European Union in which homeopathic remedies based on minerals or plants, and produced only in very low quantities, do not need to be registered. In other member states only remedies individually prepared in a pharmacy are exempt.
In 2006, homeopathic remedies accounted for 3.16% of sold units (1.08% of business volume) in the pharmaceutical sector. 0.48% of prescriptions covered by public health insurance were for homeopathical remedies. A telephone survey of German adults found that 11.5% had used homeopathy. Homeopathy accounts for 27.4% of patient contacts in the area of alternative medicine.
A survey of more than 70,000 citizens showed that approximately 4.7 million people in Italy (8.2% of the population) used homeopathy in the period from 1997 to 1999, including being given to 7.7% children under 14 years . The relative increase for using homeopathy rose from 2.5% of Italians in 1991 to 8.2% in 1999, but, despite the increase these numbers are still considered to represent comparatively light use compared to other countries.
In 1991, 40% of general practitioners used homeopathy.
Romania follows the general practice of European Union regarding homeopathy. The practice of homeopathy is regulated by law and is not permitted without a license. Most homeopathic drugs are sold over the counter. Approval of homeopathic drugs was simplified, considering there is no need for excessive testing for most of them. The manufacturing of homeopathic drugs is supervised by the National Agency of Drugs and Medical Devices (ANMDM).
In September 2011, after the National Board of Health and Welfare had put a doctor on probation for recommending homeopathy to a patient, Sweden's Supreme Administrative Court ruled that "doctors can recommend homeopathy". In October 2013 a legal review conducted by the National Board of Health and Welfare on behalf of the government concluded that the use of homeopathy by licensed medical professionals is limited to patient initiated last-resort treatments.
While the practice of homeopathy in the UK is not regulated by law, homeopathic products sold as remedies or medicines are regulated by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
In Britain, homeopathy has been in a state of steady decline over recent years. The number of National Health Service (NHS) prescriptions for homeopathic remedies dropped by over 85% between 2000 and 2010 (from 134,000 to 16,359), with homeopathy accounting for only 0.001% of the total 2010 prescribing budget. The Tunbridge Wells Homeopathic Hospital, then one of four homeopathic hospitals operated by the NHS, was closed in 2009 following a drop in referrals and a review by the West Kent Primary Care Trust of funding of homeopathy. In September 2010 another of the four, the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, was renamed as the Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine to more accurately reflect the nature of its work. A fifth homeopathic hospital run by the NHS, the Hahnemann Hospital in Liverpool, had been closed in 1976.
In 1991 up to 37% of General Practitioners used homeopathy, but a review carried out by West Kent NHS Primary Care Trust in 2007 found that less than 1% of registered patients were referred for homeopathic treatment, and that this was almost always at the patient's request rather than as the result of a clinical decision. In 2011 the British Homeopathic Association said that 400 General Practitioners used homeopathy in their everyday practice. The British Homeopathic Dental Association (BHDA) claimed to have 69 dentists, while the British Association of Homeopathic Veterinary Surgeons has 36 vets listed as members. There are over 41,000 general practitioners and around 24,000 registered veterinary surgeons in the UK, and almost 23,000 dentists doing NHS work in England. In 2009 there were approximately 2,000 homeopaths, who are not GPs, registered with various organisations. A systematic review of surveys, published in April 2013, concluded that homeopathy is used by UK medical professionals to a minor degree, and that on average referral rates are low.
Around 2009, a few UK universities started closing or reviewing their courses on homeopathy and alternative medicine, after accusations that they were teaching pseudoscience. These courses had been attracting bad publicity and criticism for the universities teaching them. In May 2010 it was announced that junior doctors' training would no longer include placements at the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital.
In February 2010 the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee concluded that: "the NHS should cease funding homeopathy. It also concludes that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should not allow homeopathic product labels to make medical claims without evidence of efficacy. As they are not medicines, homeopathic products should no longer be licensed by the MHRA." Part of the conclusions state that "When the NHS funds homeopathy, it endorses it. Since the NHS Constitution explicitly gives people the right to expect that decisions on the funding of drugs and treatments are made 'following a proper consideration of the evidence', patients may reasonably form the [misleading] view [inferred from the fact of any NHS financial support] that homeopathy is an evidence-based treatment." Since no evidence of benefit was found – other than the placebo effect – the report's recommendation was that "The Government should stop allowing the funding of homeopathy on the NHS." The government stated that this decision would be left open to the Primary Care Trusts, the smaller bodies in charge of regional NHS management, instead of being done by the government itself. In June 2010, the British Medical Association voted three to one in favour of a motion that homeopathy should be banned from the NHS, and kept from being sold as medicine in pharmacies. In February 2011, out of 104 Primary Care Trusts who responded to queries, 72 said they did not fund homeopathy, with 10 of these having stopped funding homeopathy in the last four years. By the 2011/12 financial year the percentage of PCTs funding homeopathy had fallen to 15%.
In July 2013 the UK Advertising Standards Authority concluded that homeopathy sellers were engaging in false advertising regarding their claims of efficacy of homeopathic products and that at the same time they discouraged users from seeking essential treatments for conditions for which they were needed.
After state insurance of homeopathy and four other alternative therapies had been withdrawn following a review in 2005, a 2009 referendum vote called for state backed health insurance to once more pay for these therapies. In 2012 the government reinstated them for a trial period until 2017, pending an independent investigation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the therapies.
The rules for the registration of homeopathic remedies without a concrete field of application are more liberal in Switzerland than they are in member countries of the European Union. For the majority of homeopathic medicines (those based on well-known low-risk substances), Swissmedic, the regulatory authority, offers very cheap registration by means of a simplified electronic registration procedure.
According to one 1996 study, approximately 4.4% of Australian adults have used homeopathic remedies at least once in their lives, including 1.2% that sought treatment exclusively from homeopathic practitioners.
In Canada, a study detailing the use of alternative medicines by children in Quebec found that 11% of the sampled 1,911 children used alternative medicines, and 25% of those who did use alternative medicines (less than 3% of all children sampled) used homeopathy. The study also pointed out that homeopathy is more commonly used in children in Canada than in adults, of whom only 19% of alternative medicine users used homeopathy. Physicians who choose to use alternative medicines such as homeopathy must follow guidelines set by their province's College of Physicians and Surgeons. Provincial health care generally does not cover homeopathy.
In Canada, the practice of homeopathic medicine is regulated by provincial jurisdiction, while homeopathic medicines are governed by federal jurisdiction.
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) of 1938 recognized homeopathic preparations as drugs, but with significant exceptions. A principal sponsor of the Act was New York Senator and homeopathic physician Royal Copeland, who ensured that homeopathy's own Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States (HPUS) be included, as it expressed the "self-professed quality standards" of the homeopathic profession. The finished Act thus created loopholes for the regulation of homeopathic drugs, and they are thus exempted from many of the rules regulating other drugs. The inclusion of HPUS in the Act has since been questioned by "lawyers, doctors, homeopaths, historians, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials."
Homeopathic remedies are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates manufacturing and other standards that are appropriate for homeopathic drugs, mainly through The Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States (HPUS) as administered by the Homœopathic Pharmacopœia Convention of the United States and section 400.400 of the FDA Compliance Policy Guidance Manual. Homeopathic drugs must be tested for scope of effect, manufactured, and labeled according to the Federal FD&C Act and the HPUS before they are considered official homeopathic drugs. The last bound paper edition of HPUS was published in 1979. It has been replaced by an online database available to subscribers. Official homeopathic drugs can be marketed according to their classification in the HPUS. They are not regulated under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. Many homeopathic drugs can be sold "over-the-counter"; however, some are classified as prescription-only under all circumstances, and some are classified as prescription-only in various low dilutions. As with all drugs, the labeling requirements are important, as that is one of the primary ways the FDA can regulate drugs. Homeopathic pharmaceutical techniques are not technologically complicated, and the drugs are generally considered to be biologically safe because they are so diluted to the point where there are no molecules from the original solution left in a dose of the final remedy.
- They are not required to submit new drug applications to the FDA.
- They are "exempt from good manufacturing practice requirements related to expiration dating".
- They are exempt from "finished product testing for identity and strength".
- They may "contain much higher amounts" of alcohol than other drugs, which may contain "no more than 10 percent...and...even less for children's medications".
By 2007, in the United States, $3.1 billion were spent on homeopathic medicine and 2.3% of the persons age 18 or over had consulted a practitioner that year. Homeopathy was first established in the United States by Hans Birch Gram in 1825 and rapidly gained popularity. The height of its influence was the end of the 19th century where hardly any city with over 50,000 people was without a homeopathic hospital. In 1890, there were 93 regular schools, 14 of them were fully homeopathic and 8 of them were eclectic. In 1900, there were 121 regular schools, with 22 of them being homeopathic and 10 eclectic. Teaching of homeopathy in the USA declined rapidly in the 20th century. The last purely homeopathic medical school closed in 1920, although homeopathic electives continued to be offered by the Hahnemann Medical School in Philadelphia until the 1940s.
According to one study, in 1990, 0.7% of individuals used homeopathy in the year prior to being questioned; in 1997, 3.4% had used homeopathy at least once in the previous year. According to the same study, of those who used homeopathy, 31.7% had seen a homeopathic practitioner in the past year in 1990 and the number dropped to 16.5% by 1997.
The FDA held a hearing April 20 and 21, 2015 requesting public comment on regulation of homeopathic drugs. Citing the growth of sales of over the counter homeopathic medicines, $2.7 billion as of 2007, many labeled as "natural, safe, and effective," the FDA asked:
- What are consumer and health care provider attitudes towards human drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic?
- What data sources can be identified or shared with FDA so that the Agency can better assess the risks and benefits of drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic?
- Are the current enforcement policies under the CPG appropriate to protect and promote public health in light of the tremendous growth in the homeopathic drug market? Are there alternatives to the current enforcement policies of the CPG that would inform FDA's regulatory oversight of drugs labeled as homeopathic? If so, please explain.
- Are there areas of the current CPG that could benefit from additional clarity? If so, please explain.
- Is there information regarding the regulation of homeopathic products in other countries that could inform FDA's thinking in this area?
- A large majority of human drug products labeled as homeopathic are marketed as OTC drugs.These products are available for a wide variety of indications, and many of these indications have never been considered for OTC use under a formal regulatory process. What would be an appropriate regulatory process for evaluating such indications for OTC use?
- Given the wide range of indications on drug products labeled as homeopathic and available OTC, what processes do companies currently use to evaluate whether such products, including their indications for use, are appropriate for marketing as an OTC drug?
- Do consumers and health care providers have adequate information to make informed decisions about drug products labeled as homeopathic? If not, what information, including, for example, information in labeling, would allow consumers and health care providers to be better informed about products labeled as homeopathic?
In Mexico, homeopathy is currently integrated into the national health care system. In 1895, a presidential decree by Gral. Porfirio Díaz established the first homeopathic school and Hospital as well as regulations specifying training requirements for homeopathic doctors. Of those individuals who use alternative medicines, over 26% use homeopathy.
Some countries in South America, such as Argentina or Colombia, allow only professional doctors who are qualified and have graduated from a recognised medical school to practice homeopathy. Homeopathy has been regulated in other South American countries, such as Colombia, since the beginning of the 20th century. In Brazil, homeopathy is included in the national health system, and since 1991, physicians who want to practice homeopathy must complete 2,300 hours of education prior to receiving the proper licenses.
Middle East and Asia
India has the largest homeopathic infrastructure in the world, with low estimates at about 64,000, but going as high as 300,000 practising homeopaths. In addition, there are 180 colleges teaching courses, and 7500 government clinics and 307 hospitals which dispense homeopathic remedies. In China and Japan, homeopathy appears to be almost unknown;
Asiatic countries many times were exposed to both homeopathic and non-homeopathic ideas about medicine through invading armies that had ties to Europe. In Malaysia, homeopathy was introduced during World War II by Indian military personnel that formed bulk of the British army in Asia. The French army brought early modern medicine to Laos during their 1893 invasion. In China, Shanghai had one homeopathic hospital in 1911, and had four later in 1934. In this region, the European models of medicine complemented, but did not replace, the local traditional medicines.
Homeopathy is becoming popular in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in Iran. The UAE Ministry of Health (MOH) recognizes and regulates the practice of homeopathy in a systematic way. Both medical doctors and lay practitioners can practise homeopathy but they all should pass MOH exams which cover both medical science and homeopathy. The Ministry of Health of Iran recognizes homeopathy as a legal alternative treatment. The Iranian Homeopathic Association, formed with the permission of the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Health, is the reference association for providing standards of homeopathy. In Iran only medical doctors can practice homeopathy.
Homeopathy research and education is looked after by the Department of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH), which is part of the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, which also takes care of educational standards in the Indian Systems of Medicines and Homoeopathy colleges and promotes research in respective fields. Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy (CCRH), was established as an autonomous organization, at New Delhi in 1978 by Govt. of India.
Homeopathic education is regulated by Central Council of Homoeopathy (CCH), a statutory body under the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, formed in 1973 through Act of Parliament is one of Professional Councils of University Grants Commission (UGC), which monitors all higher education across India.
In 2007 in the state of Uttar Pradesh (population 166 million in 2001) there were 27,548 registered homeopathic practitioners compared with 38,950 medical doctors (referred to as allopaths by those practicing alternative medicine), 59,783 ayurvedic and 14,905 unani practitioners.
Before independence, homeopathy was present in modern-day Pakistan, which was then undivided India. Doctors like Muhammad Masood Qureshi from Lahore and Dr. Hamid from Karachi were practicing homeopaths since as far back as 1918. After independence in 1947, the Government of Pakistan finally recognized homeopathy in 1965 as a legal mode of medical treatment and asked for practitioners to be registered and syllabus for colleges determined, under the Unani, Ayurvedic and Homoeopathic Practitioners Act of 1965. However, until now, homeopathy did not come under the ambit of the Ministry of Health, and thus homeopathic products and manufacturers were not liable to conform to the standards and practices set by the Ministry. Exams of homeopathic medical colleges are administered by National Council of Homeopathy which is a regulatory body attached with the Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination. On 13 November 2012, the President of Pakistan signed the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act (DRAP Act, 2012), which formed the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan as the regulator of therapeutic goods in the country at the federal level. Alternative medicines such as Homeopathic, Biochemic, Ayurvedic,Herbal and Unani medicines are now defined as medicines and are now under the ambit of drug rules; a separate Division named Division of Health and OTC (non-drugs) has been established to regulate the assessment, licensing and registration of alternative medicines manufacture and quality control.
In South Africa, homeopathy is currently regulated by the Allied Health Professions Act, 1982 (Act 63 of 1982) together with the Regulations to the said Act which was set up to provide for the establishment of a statutory body, the Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa (AHPCSA) to regulate the homeopathic profession, amongst ten others. The AHPCSA is one of five Statutory Health Professional Councils regulating health professions in South Africa. Any person wishing to practice Homeopathy in any way whatsover within the borders of South Africa must be registered with the AHPCSA. Registration is a legal requirement and under South African Law it is a criminal offense to practice homeopathy without registration. Homoeopathic registration in South Africa enjoys a standing, rights and privileges similar to that of conventional medical practitioners. This means that the legal scope of practice of a homeopathic practitioner is very similar to that of a conventional medical practitioner. The scope of practice includes also what would generally be applicable to Naturopathic practitioners in countries like the USA.
A Homeopathic Practitioner may diagnose, in fact being a diagnostic primary health care profession, a Homeopathic Practitioner is legally compelled to make a diagnosis and provide the appropriate ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Homeopathic Practitioners also have to be licensed to compound Homeopathic medicine and to dispense any medicine falling within their scope of practice. Both conventional pharmacology and Homoeopharmaceutics are a legal training requirement.
Training therefore is based upon the medical curriculum with Homoeopathy as the primary therapeutic focus. From this perspective it is understandable that (as for Medical Practitioners where the requirement for registration is a MBChB or equivalent) in the case of Homeopathy the requirement for registration is a Master's degree in Homeopathy MTech(Hom) or equivalent.
Homoeopathic practitioners are trained diagnosticians, recognised as primary contact practitioners. It should be noted that, whereas the vast majority of international Homoeopathic schools offer skills-oriented Homoeopathic training, South Africa offers professional training at a level required for the practising of Homoeopathy as a primary contact health profession in accordance with the scope of practice of such a profession.
All private Homeopathic colleges were closed during the late 1970s by the South African Department of Health (read the History and Development of Homeopathic Education in South Africa). Existing practitioners were put into a closed register and in terms of the new legislation, and medical doctors were allowed to keep practicing homeopathy regardless of their knowledge of the subject.:45 Nowadays, the only training recognised by the AHPCSA is a five-year full-time Master's degree in Homoeopathy offered at the University of Johannesburg and Durban University of Technology. The M.Tech(Hom) consists of a five-year full-time medico-scientific course based on the medical curriculum with the core focus on classical, clinical, modern and conventional Homoeopathy, Homoeopharmaceutics and ending with a masters research dissertation. Graduates are registered as Homoeopathic practitioners only after having completed their post-graduate internship.
The practice of Homeopathy in South Africa requires medical training as prerequisite. Two routes thus exist for entrance into Homeopathy, either via the medically based homeopathic Master's degree course (MTech-Hom) or once a medical practitioner is registered for independent practice, by way of the Post Graduate Diploma in Homeopathy offered by the South African Faculty of Homoeopathy (SAFH). Medical practitioners may register as Homoeopathic practitioners only after successful completion of the post graduate diploma. Once registered, homeopathic practitioners may do the prescribed Compounding and Dispensing course through the University of Pretoria and thereafter apply for a License to Compound and Dispense Homeopathic Medicine from the National Department of Health.
(1) Subject to the provisions of this section-
(a) the Director-General may on application in the prescribed manner and on payment of the prescribed fee issue to a medical practitioner, dentist, practitioner, nurse or other person registered under the Health Professions Act, 1974, a licence to compound and dispense medicines, on the prescribed conditions;
(5) No person shall compound or dispense a medicine unless he or she is authorised thereto in terms of the Pharmacy Act, 1974, is a veterinarian or is the holder of a licence as contemplated in subsection(1)(a).
The Medicines Control Council was set up in 1965, and it put all types of medicine under the same standards. It was replaced in 1998 by the South African Medicines and Medical Devices Regulatory Authority, which placed separate procedures for registering regular and alternative medicines, in order to regulate them better.:45
Both medically qualified practitioners and lay persons can practice homeopathy, with the Congress of Homoeopathic Medicine Practitioners having 30 medical doctors on its register in 2005. The All-Nigeria Homeopathic Medical Organization was founded in 1961, and the first homeopathic practitioner, I. Okogeri, began practice the following year. The Nigerian College of Homoeopathic Medicine, founded in 1972, is recognised by the government of the East Central State. The Nigerian Institute of Homeopathy has special consultative status with the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- Tuomela R (1987). "Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience". In Pitt JC, Marcello P. Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 98 (Springer). pp. 83–101. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. Missing or empty
- Smith K (2012). "Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical". Bioethics 26 (9): 508–512. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x.
- Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?. Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century (Springer). pp. 19–57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7.
within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery
- "Legal Status of Traditional Medicine and Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Worldwide Review" (PDF). World Health Organization. World Health Organization. Note that the document specifically states that it is not an official document of the WHO. 2001. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
- Dacey J (14 January 2011). "Alternative therapies are put to the test". swissinfo.ch. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- "Council Directive 92/73/EEC of 22 September 1992 widening the scope of Directives 65/65/EEC and 75/319/EEC on the approximation of provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action relating to medicinal products and laying down additional provisions on homeopathic products".
- "Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use".
- "Het Belgisch Staatsblad.".
- "Strengere regels voor beoefenen van homeopathie". http://www.nieuwsblad.be.
- "Bescherming van de patiënt: strikte regels om homeopathie te beoefenen - Presscenter.org".
- "KCE 154A: Stand van zaken van de homeopathie in België" (PDF). kce.fgov.be. 2011. p. vii.
- Fisher, Peter; Adam Ward (9 July 1994). "Medicine in Europe: Complementary medicine in Europe". BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6947.107. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
- §38 and § 39 of the German Arzneimittelgesetz (pharmaceuticals law).
- Report of a 2007 European Medicines Agency workshop on homeopathic medicinal products, including a presentation by the European Committee for Homeopathy.
- Bücker, B; Groenewold M; Schoefer Y; Schäfer T (Aug–Sep 2008). "The use of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) in 1 001 German adults: results of a population-based telephone survey". Gesundheitswesen (Stuttgart - New York: Georg Thieme Verlag KG) 70 (8–9): e29–36. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1081505. PMID 18785094.
- Menniti-Ippolito, Francesca; Lidia Gargiulo; Emanuela Bologna; Emanuela Forcella; Roberto Raschetti (2002). "Use of unconventional medicine in Italy: a nation-wide survey" (PDF). European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 58: 61–64. doi:10.1007/s00228-002-0435-8.
- Indaco Systems (7 May 2007). "Legea nr. 118/2007 privind organizarea si functionarea activitatilor si practicilor de medicina complementara/alternativa". Lege5.
- Indaco Systems (21 May 2007). "Procedura de autorizare simplificata pentru unele medicamente homeopate din 10.05.2007". Lege5.
- Indaco Systems (21 October 2014). "Legea nr. 95/2006 privind reforma in domeniul sanatatii actualizat la data de 22.10.2014". Lege5.
- "'Doctors can recommend homeopathy': court". The Local - Swedens News in English. 24 Sep 2011. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
- The Twenty First Floor. "Skeptic News: Swedish Doctors can recommend homeopathy". Retrieved 14 May 2012.
- "Socialstyrelsen: Homeopati bara i undantagsfall". DagensMedicin.se.
- "FAQs". British Homeopathic Association. Retrieved 2011-12-11.
- "Homeopathic medicines". Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Retrieved 2011-12-11.
- Beckford, M. (2011-08-30). "NHS spending on homeopathy prescriptions falls to £122,000". London: Daily telegraph.
- Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy, Fourth Report of Session 2009–10, House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 20 October 2009, parliament.uk
- "History of The Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine". University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Retrieved 2011-02-05.
- "The Liverpool Hahnemann Hospital and Homeopathic Dispensaries including Liverpool branch of the British Homeopathic Society". National Archives.
- "Homeopathy Commissioning Review: Conclusions & Recommendation". West Kent NHS Primary Care Trust. Retrieved 2012-05-16.
- [dead link]
- [dead link]
- "List of Homeopathic Dentists - British Homeopathic Dental Association".
- [dead link]
- "Briefing Paper – General Practitioners". British Medical Association. Retrieved 2011-12-19.
- "About the veterinary profession". Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Retrieved 2011-12-11.
- "NHS Dental statistics for England: 2010/11" (PDF). NHS Information Centre. Retrieved 2011-12-11.
- "Homeopath". TES Growing Ambitions. Retrieved 2012-05-05.
- Perry, R; Watson, L; Terry, R; Onakpoya, I; Ernst, E (2013), "British general practitioners' attitudes towards and usage of homeopathy: a systematic review of surveys", Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies, doi:10.1111/fct.12018
- Alexandra Frean (2009-01-03). "Universities drop degree courses in alternative medicine". Times Online (London).
- Helen Puttick (2009-04-24). "NHS scraps doctors’ training at Scots homeopathic hospital". heraldscotland.
- "Course Title: Homeopathy". University of Central Lancashire. Retrieved 2012-02-01.
- "UK ACADEMIC PARTNERS". Middlesex University. Retrieved 2012-02-01.
- UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee – "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"
- Boseley, Sarah (2010-06-29). "Ban homeopathy from NHS, say doctors". The Guardian (London).
- "Third of NHS trusts fund homeopathy". BBC News. 2011-02-18.
- "PCTs abandon funding for homeopathy". GPonline.com. Retrieved 2012-10-17.
- "ASA adjudication on Society of Homeopaths". ASA. 3 July 2013. Retrieved 4 July 2013.
- "Swiss recognise 'alternative' medicine – for now".
- Swissmedic: Rules for homeopathic medicines. German version, French version.
- MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW (1996). "Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia". Lancet 347 (9001): 569–573. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91271-4. PMID 8596318.
- Spigelblatt L, Laîné-Ammara G, Pless IB, Guyver A (1994). "The use of alternative medicine by children". Pediatrics 94 (6 Pt 1): 811–4. PMID 7970994.
- Suzanne White Junod, Ph.D., "An Alternative Perspective: Homeopathic Drugs, Royal Copeland, and Federal Drug Regulation", Food and Drug Law Journal 55:161-183, 2001
- "CPG Sec. 400.400 Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed".
- Pharmacopoeia Convention of the American Institute of Homeopathy; American Institute of Homeopathy; Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia Convention of the United States; National Center for Homoeopathy (U.S.) (1979). The homoeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States (8th ed.). Falls Church, Virginia: American Institute of Homeopathy. OCLC 5880151.
- "What is the HPUS Online Database?". hpus.com. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
- "Products and Services". hpus.com. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
- Milgrom LR (2007). "Conspicuous by its absence: the memory of water, macro-entanglement, and the possibility of homeopathy". Homeopathy 96 (3): 209–19. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2007.05.002. PMID 17678819.
- Isadora Stehlin, Food and Drug Administration Public Affairs Officer, "Homeopathy: Real Medicine or Empty Promises?", FDA Consumer, December 1996
- "The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States: Cost Data". National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. July 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-16.
- "Costs of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) and Frequency of Visits to CAM Practitioners: United States, 2007" (PDF). National Center for Health Statistics. July 30, 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-16.
- Miller, Timothy (1995). America's alternative religions. State University of New York Press, Albany. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-7914-2397-4.
- Frederick Karst, Homeopathy In Illinois, Caduceus, 4:2, 1988, pp. 1-33; p. 5
- Charles S Cameron, Homeopathy in Retrospect, Trans. Stud. Coll. Phys. Philadelp., 27, 1959, 28-33; p. 30
- History of Homeopathy, Creighton University Department of Pharmacology, retrieved 2007-07-23
- Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL et al. (1998). "Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey". JAMA 280 (18): 1569–1575. doi:10.1001/jama.280.18.1569. PMID 9820257.
- Kelly Servick (April 21, 2015). "FDA takes new look at homeopathy". Science. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
Under FDA guidelines issued in 1988, a company can sell homeopathic products over the counter without demonstrating their safety or efficacy, and—unlike dietary supplements—their packaging can include claims about treating specific conditions, as long as they are “self-limiting” and not chronic. Such conditions include sprains, colds, or allergies.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (March 27, 2015). "Homeopathic Product Regulation: Evaluating the Food and Drug Administration's Regulatory Framework After a Quarter-Century; Public Hearing". federalregister.gov. Federal Register. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public hearing to obtain information and comments from stakeholders about the current use of human drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic, as well as the Agency's regulatory framework for such products. These products include prescription drugs and biological products labeled as homeopathic and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs labeled as homeopathic. FDA is seeking participants for the public hearing and written comments from all interested parties, including, but not limited to, consumers, patients, caregivers, health care professionals, patient groups, and industry. FDA is seeking input on a number of specific questions, but is interested in any other pertinent information participants would like to share.
- Nigenda G, Cifuentes E, Hill W (2004). "Knowledge and practice of traditional medicine in Mexico: a survey of healthcare practitioners". International journal of occupational and environmental health: official journal of the International Commission on Occupational Health 10 (4): 416–420. doi:10.1179/oeh.2004.10.4.416. PMID 15702756.
- Sólo médicos especializados podrán ejercer la homeopatía en Colombia, El Observatorio de la Universidad Colombiana,19 March 2009
- Dr. Raj Kumar Manchanda & Dr. Mukul Kulashreshtha, Cost Effectiveness and Efficacy of Homeopathy in Primary Health Care Units of Government of Delhi- A study
- Arokiasamy, P; M. Guruswamy, T.K. Roy, H. Lhungdim, et al. "World Health Survey, 2003" (PDF). International Institute for Population Sciences. Retrieved 2007-09-07.
- Alternative Systems of Medicine: Homeopathy, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Ayurveda, retrieved March 21, 2008
- WHO: Legal Status of Traditional Medicine and Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Worldwide Review, 2001, retrieved March 21, 2008
- Interview to Dr. Luc after a 3 weeks visit to china, 2005, retrieved March 21, 2008
- Eswara Das (2005). B. Jain, ed. History & Status of Homoeopathy Around the World. New Delhi, India: B. Jain. p. 56. ISBN 81-8056-573-4.
- History of Homeopathy CCRH Official website.
- CCRH History Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy (CCRH)
- "Professional Councils". University Grants Commission (UGC) website.
- National Rural Health Mission. NRHM PIP_14.06.07.doc "State Action Plan Uttar Pradesh (2007 - 2008)". Department of Family Welfare Uttar Pradesh. Retrieved 16 May 2012.
- The Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa. "The Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa.".
- The Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa. "The Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa.".
- The Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa. "ahpcsa.co.za".
- "Drs JP Prinsloo Inc".
- [dead link]
- [dead link]
- Section 22C(5) of the Medicines and Related Substances Act, (Act 101 of 1965)
- Act 132, the South African Medicines and Medical Devices Regulatory Authority Bill (64)
- Das, E. (2005): History and Status of Homeopathy Around the World, B. Jain Publishers, New Delhi, p. 189
- "Welcome to csonet.org - Website of the UN DESA NGO Branch. At your service".
- pubmeddev. "Homeopathy: the Nigerian experience.".