Social issues in India

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Socio-economic issues in India)
Jump to: navigation, search

Since India's Independence in 1947, the South Asian nation has faced multiple social and economic issues.

Overpopulation[edit]

Crowds in a Chennai street.

The population of India is an estimated 1.27 billion.[1][2][3] Though India ranks second in population, it ranks 33 in population density. Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, had implemented a forced sterilization program in the early 1970s but the program failed. Officially, men with two children or more were required to be sterilised, but many unmarried young men, political opponents and ignorant, poor men were also believed to have been affected by this program. This program is still remembered and regretted in India, and is blamed for creating a public aversion to family planning, which hampered Government programs for decades.[4]

Economic issues[edit]

Further information: Economy of India

Poverty[edit]

Main article: Poverty in India
2014 Poverty rate chart comparing India to select countries based on World Bank's May 2014 PPP method.[5]

India suffers from substantial poverty. According to World Bank's estimates on poverty based on 2005 data, India has 456 million people, 41.6% of its population, living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day. The world Bank further estimates that 33% of the global poor now reside in India. Moreover, India also has 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.[6][7][8][9]

Official figures estimate that 27.5%[10] of Indians lived below the national poverty line in 2004–2005.[11] A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) found that 25% of Indians, or 236 million people, lived on less than 20 rupees per day[12] with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject poverty."[13]

Sanitation[edit]

Millions depend upon the polluted Ganges river.

Lack of proper sanitation is a major concern for India. Statistics conducted by UNICEF have shown that only 31% of India’s population is able to utilise proper sanitation facilities as of 2008.[14] It is estimated that one in every ten deaths in India is linked to poor sanitation and hygiene. Diarrhoea is the single largest killer and accounts for one in every twenty deaths.[14] Around 450,000 deaths were linked to diarrhoea alone in 2006, of which 88% were deaths of children below five.[14] Studies by UNICEF have also shown that diseases resulting from poor sanitation affects children in their cognitive development.[15]

People without access to proper sanitation facilities more-often-than-not defecate in public or in rivers. One gram of faeces could potentially contain 10 million viruses, one million bacteria, 1000 parasite cysts and 100 worm eggs.[16] The Ganga river in India has a stunning 1.1 million litres of raw sewage being disposed into it every minute.[16] The high level of contamination of the river by human waste allow diseases like cholera to spread easily, resulting in many deaths, especially among children who are more susceptible to such viruses.[17]

A lack of adequate sanitation also leads to significant economic losses for the country. A Water and sanitation Program (WSP) study The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Sanitation in India (2010) showed that inadequate sanitation caused India considerable economic losses, equivalent to 6.4 per cent of India’s GDP in 2006 at US$53.8 billion (Rs.2.4 trillion).[18] In addition, the poorest 20% of households living in urban areas bore the highest per capita economic impacts of inadequate sanitation.[19]

Recognising the importance of proper sanitation, the Government of India started the Central Rural Sanitation Program (CRSP) in 1986, in hope of improving the basic sanitation amenities of rural areas. This program was later reviewed and, in 1999, the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) was launched. Programs such as Individual Household Latrines (IHHL), School Sanitation and Hygiene Education (SSHE), Community Sanitary Complex, Anganwadi toilets were implemented under the TSC.[20]

Corruption perceptions map for Indian states based on a Transparency International survey in 2005. Darker regions were perceived to be more corrupt.[21] These corruption indices have been changing. Bihar perceived as among most corrupt in 2005, was among least corrupt in 2011.[22]

Through the TSC, the Indian Government hopes to stimulate the demand for sanitation facilities in its less-urbanised areas, rather than to continually provide these amenities to these area's residents. This is a two-pronged strategy, where the people involved in this program take ownership and better maintain their sanitation facilities, and at the same time, reduces the liabilities and costs on the Indian Government. This would allow the government to reallocate their resources to other aspects of development.[23] Thus, the government set the objective of granting access to toilets to all by 2017.[24]

To meet this objective, incentives are given out to encourage participation from the rural population to construct their own sanitation amenities. In addition, the government has set out to educate its people on the importance and benefits of proper sanitation through mass communication and interpersonal communication techniques. This is done through mass and print media to reach out to a larger audience and through group discussions and games to better engage and interact with the individual.[25]

Corruption[edit]

Main article: Corruption in India

Corruption is widespread in India. India is ranked 95 out of a 179 countries in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, but its score has improved consistently from 2.7 in 2002 to 3.1 in 2011.[26]

In India, corruption takes the form of bribes, tax evasion, exchange controls, embezzlement, etc. A 2005 study done by Transparency International[unreliable source?] (TI) India found that more than 50%[dubious ] had firsthand[dubious ] experience of paying bribe or peddling influence to get a job done in a public office.[27] The chief economic consequences of corruption are the loss to the exchequer, an unhealthy climate for investment and an increase in the cost of government-subsidised services.

The TI India study estimates the monetary value of petty corruption in 11 basic services provided by the government, like education, healthcare, judiciary, police, etc., to be around Rs.21,068 crores.[27] India still ranks in the bottom quartile of developing nations in terms of the ease of doing business, and compared to China and other lower developed Asian nations, the average time taken to secure the clearances for a startup or to invoke bankruptcy is much greater.[28]

Education[edit]

Further information: Education in India and Literacy in India
Literacy rate map of India, 2011.[29]

Initiatives[edit]

Since the Indian Constitution was completed in 1949, education has remained one of the priorities of the Indian government. The first education minister Maulana Azad founded a system of education which aimed to provide free education at the primary level. Primary education was made free and compulsory for children from 6-14, and child labour was banned. The government introduced incentives to education and disincentives for not receiving education – for instance, the provision of mid-day meals in schools were introduced.

Many similar initiatives echoed, and the largest of such initiatives is Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, which actively promoted “Education for All”. In line with this, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) aimed to increase their expenditure on education to 6% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from values fluctuating about 3% through their National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP) in 2004. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act was also imposed in 2009. Despite these initiatives, education continues to persist as an impediment to development.

Issues[edit]

While many schools were built, they had poor infrastructure and inadequate facilities. Schools in the rural areas were especially affected. According to District Information System for Education (DISE) in India in 2009, only about 51.5% of all schools in India have boundary walls, 16.65% have computers and 39% have electricity. Of which, only 6.47% of primary schools and 33.4% of upper primary schools have computers, and only 27.7% of primary schools have electricity.[30] Learning in poorly furnished schools was not conducive, resulting in poor quality education.

Furthermore, the absence rates of teachers and students were high, while their retainment rates low. The incentives for going to school were not apparent, while punishment for absence was not enforced. Despite the government’s decree on compulsory education and the child labour ban, many children were still missing classes to go to work. The government did not interfere even when children missed school.

Also, online country studies publications by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress stated that “it was not unusual for the teacher to be absent or even to subcontract the teaching work to unqualified substitutes”.[31] This exacerbates the problems of the lack of qualified teachers. Currently, the student-teacher ratio remains high at around 32, which is not much of an improvement since 2006 when the ratio was 34.[32]

Economic and social disparities also plague the fundamentals of the education system. Rural children are less able to receive education because of greater opportunity costs, since rural children have to work to contribute to the family’s income. According to the Annual Status of Education in 2009, the average attendance rate of students in the rural states is about 75%. Though this rate varies significantly, states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar had more than 40% absentees during a random visit to their schools. In the urban states, more than 90% of the students were present in their schools during a visit.[33]

Violence[edit]

Religious violence[edit]

A railway station in Punjab during large-scale migration that followed the partition of India along religious lines.

Constitutionally India is a secular state, [34] but large-scale violence have periodically occurred in India since independence. In recent decades, communal tensions and religion-based politics have become more prominent.

In Jammu and Kashmir, Since March 1990, estimates of between 250,000 to 300,000 pandits have migrated outside Kashmir due to persecution by Islamic fundamentalists in the largest case of ethnic cleansing since the partition of India.[35] The proportion of Kashmiri Pandits in the Kashmir valley has declined from about 15% in 1947 to, by some estimates, less than 0.1% since the insurgency in Kashmir took on a religious and sectarian flavor.[36] Many Kashmiri Pandits have been killed by Islamist terrorists in incidents such as the Wandhama massacre and the 2000 Amarnath pilgrimage massacre.[37][38][39][40][41]

In 1990s, violent attacks on Christians in India were reported.[42] The acts of violence include arson of churches, forced conversion of Christians to Hinduism, distribution of threatening literature, raping of nuns, murder of Christian priests and destruction of Christian schools, colleges, and cemeteries.[43][44] The Sangh Parivar and related organisations have stated that the violence is an expression of "spontaneous anger" of "vanvasis" against "forcible conversion" activities undertaken by missionaries,[43][45][46] a claim described as "absurd" and rejected by scholars.[43]

Between 1964 and 1996, thirty-eight incidents of violence against Christians were reported.[43] In 1997, twenty-four such incidents were reported.[47] In 2007 and 2008 there was a further flare up of tensions in Orissa, the first following the Christians' putting up a Pandhal in land traditionally used by Hindus and the second after the unprovoked murder of a Hindu Guru and four of his disciples while observing Janmashtami puja. This was followed by an attack on a 150-year-old church in Madhya Pradesh,[48] and more attacks in Karnataka,[49]

Terrorism[edit]

Main article: Terrorism in India

The regions with long term terrorist activities today are Jammu and Kashmir, Central India (Naxalism) and Seven Sister States (independence and autonomy movements). In the past, the Punjab insurgency led to militant activities in the Indian state of Punjab as well as the national capital Delhi (Delhi serial blasts, anti-Sikh riots). As of 2006, at least 232 of the country’s 608 districts were afflicted, at differing intensities, by various insurgent and terrorist movements.[50]

Terrorism in India has often been alleged to be sponsored by Pakistan. After most acts of terrorism in India, many journalists and politicians accuse Pakistan's intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence of playing a role.[51]

Naxalite Maoist insurgency[edit]

Main article: Naxalism
Areas with Naxalite activity in 2007 (left) and in 2013 (right).

Naxalism is an informal name given to communist groups that were born out of the Sino-Soviet split in the Indian communist movement. Ideologically they belong to various trends of Maoism. Initially the movement had its centre in West Bengal. In recent years, they have spread into less developed areas of rural central and eastern India, such as Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh through the activities of underground groups like the Communist Party of India (Maoist).[52] The CPI (Maoist) and some other Naxal factions are considered terrorists by the Government of India and various state governments in India.[53]

Caste related violence[edit]

Crime rates against Dalits, women and overall population, per 100,000, from 2001 to 2011.[54] The overall crime rate in the United States was 2610 per 100,000 people in 2012.[55]

Over the years, various incidents of violence against Dalits, such as Kherlanji Massacre have been reported from many parts of India. At the same time, many violent protests by Dalits, such as the 2006 Dalit protests in Maharashtra, have been reported as well.

The Mandal Commission was established in 1979 to "identify the socially or educationally backward",[56] and to consider the question of seat reservations and quotas for people to redress caste discrimination. In 1980, the commission's report affirmed the affirmative action practice under Indian law whereby members of lower castes were given exclusive access to a certain portion of government jobs and slots in public universities. When V. P. Singh Government tried to implement the recommendations of Mandal Commission in 1989, massive protests were held in the country. Many alleged that the politicians were trying to cash in on caste-based reservations for purely pragmatic electoral purposes.

In 1990s, many parties Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the Samajwadi Party and the Janata Dal started claiming that they are representing the backward castes. Many such parties, relying primarily on Backward Classes' support, often in alliance with Dalits and Muslims, rose to power in Indian states.[57] At the same time, many Dalit leaders and intellectuals started realizing that the main Dalit oppressors were so-called Other Backward Classes,[58] and formed their own parties, such as the Indian Justice Party. The Congress (I) in Maharashtra long relied on OBCs' backing for its political success.[57]

Bharatiya Janata Party has also showcased its Dalit and OBC leaders to prove that it is not an upper-caste party. Bangaru Laxman, the former BJP president (2001–2002) was a Dalit. Sanyasin Uma Bharati, former CM of Madhya Pradesh, who belongs to OBC caste, was a former BJP leader. In 2006 Arjun Singh cabinet minister for MHRD of the UPA government was accused of playing caste politics when he introduced reservations for OBCs in educational institutions all around.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Overpopulation in India". Serendip.brynmawr.edu. Retrieved 2013-08-24. 
  2. ^ "Overpopulation in India and China". Web.archive.org. 27 October 2009. Archived from the original on 2009-10-27. Retrieved 17 August 2013. 
  3. ^ "Over-population warning as India's billionth baby is born". The Guardian (London). 11 May 2000. Retrieved 23 May 2010. 
  4. ^ "Manas: History and Politics, Indira Gandhi". Sscnet.ucla.edu. Retrieved 17 August 2013. 
  5. ^ Shawn Donnan (May 9 2014), World Bank eyes biggest global poverty line increase in decades, The Financial Times
  6. ^ "One-third of world's poor in India: Survey". The Times Of India. 27 August 2008. 
  7. ^ "World Bank's new poverty norms find larger number of poor in India". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 28 August 2008. 
  8. ^ "Opinion". The Times Of India. 30 August 2008. 
  9. ^ Schifferes, Steve (27 August 2008). "World poverty 'more widespread'". BBC News. Retrieved 23 May 2010. 
  10. ^ This figure is extremely sensitive to the surveying methodology used. The Uniform Recall Period (URP) gives 27.5%. The Mixed Recall Period (MRP) gives a figure of 21.8%
  11. ^ Planning commission of India. Poverty estimates for 2004–2005
  12. ^ This figure has been variously reported as either "2 dollars per day" or "0.5 dollars per day". The former figure comes from the PPP conversion rate, whereas the latter comes from the market exchange rate. Also note that this figure does not contradict the NSS derived figure, which uses calorie consumption as the basis for its poverty line. It just uses a more inclusive poverty line
  13. ^ Nearly 80 Percent of India Lives On Half Dollar A Day, Reuters, 10 August 2007, retrieved 15 August 2007 
  14. ^ a b c "India: Health Statistics". UNICEF Statistics. Retrieved 13 September 2011. 
  15. ^ "10 Facts on Sanitation: 2". World Health Organization Fact Fille. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  16. ^ a b "10 Facts on Sanitation: 3". World Health Organization Fact File. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  17. ^ "Enhanced Quality of Life through Sustained Sanitation". India Country Paper. Government of India. p. 14. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  18. ^ "The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Sanitation in India". Water and Sanitation Program Publications. p. 2. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  19. ^ "The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Sanitation in India". Water and Sanitation Program Publications. p. 6. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  20. ^ "Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC)". Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation Programmes. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  21. ^ Nicholas Charron (2010), The Correlates of Corruption in India: Analysis and Evidence from the States, Asian Journal of Political Science, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp. 177-194
  22. ^ Debroy and Bhandari (2011). "Corruption in India". The World Finance Review. 
  23. ^ "Sanitation: A Long Way to Go". WaterAid: Inputs at SACOSAN. WaterAid. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  24. ^ "Guidelines: Total Sanitation Campaign". Central Rural Sanitation Programme. p. 5. Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  25. ^ "Techniques of IEC". Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation: TSC — Information. Education & Communication (IEC). Retrieved 12 September 2011. 
  26. ^ Believe it or not! India is becoming less corrupt. CNN-IBN. 26 September 2007.
  27. ^ a b Centre for Media Studies (2005), India Corruption Study 2005: To Improve Governance Volume – I: Key Highlights, Transparency International India.
  28. ^ Economic Survey 2004–2005 
  29. ^ Ranking of states and union territories by lireacy rate: 2011 Census of India Report (2013)
  30. ^ Statistics from the District Information System for Education (DISE)
  31. ^ Country Studies of India
  32. ^ Statistics from the District Information System for Education (DISE)
  33. ^ India Education Report 2009
  34. ^ "Constitution of India as of 29 July 2008". The Constitution Of India. Ministry of Law & Justice. Retrieved 13 April 2011. 
  35. ^ Kashmiri Pandits in Nandimarg decide to leave Valley, Outlook, 30 March 2003, retrieved 30 November 2007 
  36. ^ Kashmir: The scarred and the beautiful. New York Review of Books, 1 May 2008, p. 14.
  37. ^ 'I heard the cries of my mother and sisters', Rediff, 27 January 1998, retrieved 30 November 2007 
  38. ^ Migrant Pandits voted for end of terror in valley, The Tribune, 27 April 2004, retrieved 30 November 2007 
  39. ^ At least 58 dead in 2 attacks in Kashmir, CNN, 2 August 2000, retrieved 30 November 2007 [dead link]
  40. ^ City shocked at killing of Kashmiri Pandits, The Times of India, 25 March 2003, retrieved 30 November 2007 
  41. ^ Phil Reeves (25 March 2003), Islamic militants kill 24 Hindus in Kashmir massacre, The Independent, retrieved 30 November 2007 
  42. ^ Anti-Christian Violence on the Rise in India 
  43. ^ a b c d Anti-Christian Violence in India 
  44. ^ Anti-Christian Violence on the Rise in India
  45. ^ Low, Alaine M.; Brown, Judith M.; Frykenberg, Robert Eric (eds.) (2002), Christians, Cultural Interactions, and India's Religious Traditions, Grand Rapids, Mich: W.B. Eerdmans, p. 134, ISBN 0-7007-1601-7 
  46. ^ Subba, Tanka Bahadur; Som, Sujit; Baral, K. C (eds.) (2005), Between Ethnography and Fiction: Verrier Elwin and the Tribal Question in India, New Delhi: Orient Longman, ISBN 81-250-2812-9 
  47. ^ Ram Puniyani (2003), Communal Politics: Facts Versus Myths, SAGE, p. 167, ISBN 0-7619-9667-2 
  48. ^ "150-yr-old church set afire in Madhya Pradesh". The Times Of India. 20 September 2008. 
  49. ^ "Protest in Delhi over violence against Christians — Thaindian News". Thaindian.com. 26 September 2008. Retrieved 17 August 2013. 
  50. ^ India Assessment – 2007
  51. ^ "‘Pak the problem, not the solution’". Hindustan Times. 16 September 2008. Retrieved 17 August 2013. 
  52. ^ Ramakrishnan, Venkitesh (21 September 2005), The Naxalite Challenge, Frontline Magazine (The Hindu), retrieved 15 March 2007 
  53. ^ Diwanji, A. K. (2 October 2003), Primer: Who are the Naxalites?, Rediff.com, retrieved 15 March 2007 
  54. ^ Incidence of Total Cognizable Crime (IPC) 1953-2011, Compendium of Crime in India, National Crime Research Bureau (NCRB), Union Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India (2012)
  55. ^ CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION, 2012 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice (USA), page 6, October 2013.
  56. ^ Bhattacharya, Amit. Who are the OBCs?, archived from the original on 27 June 2006, retrieved 19 April 2006  Times of India, 8 April 2006.
  57. ^ a b Caste-Based Parties, Country Studies US, retrieved 12 December 2006 
  58. ^ Danny Yee, Book review of Caste, Society and Politics in India: From the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age, retrieved 11 December 2006