Talk:/pol/

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of Antisemitism Tag[edit]

On a website with prolific free speech and offensive claims about every religion, every race, and gender, it is inappropriate to include the anti-semitism tag because it elevates that particular offense above others. There anti-black racism, anti-white racism, anti-Christian racism, and anti-Jewish racism. There is no justification for the anti-semitism tag over other tags. Include them all, or include none. ~ Gkoogz (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there were series boxes for those as well they would presumably be included as well. For what it's worth, many of the websites included in the "Antisemitism on the Internet" grouping have other types of bigotry mentioned in their leads along with antisemitism (see 8chan, Gab (social network), The Daily Stormer, etc.) GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. If there were other series boxes for anti-white discrimination, we would surely add it here. Trust me, I'm not lying. Accidentally there is no such thing. Mintus590 (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this is logical, pol uses the n-word just as much as they use anti-semetic language. 2601:646:9E02:6D60:641E:88EC:5C3A:6FBC (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect "Politically Incorrect" has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § "Politically Incorrect" until a consensus is reached. Bsoyka (tcg) 02:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pageviews[edit]

It seems that pol/ has more views than /pol/ (current title). Is there a reason? I wonder if the slash in the beginning is affecting this system. LIrala (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]