This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
That export total is unsourced in the Arabic article and would need a WP:RS source here. Wikipedia is not a source for itself. Zefr (talk) 22:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found the source for the 100 tons per year figure in the Arabic article,[1] but that figure conflicts with the "thousands of tons" currently cited in the English article (from a different website). --DDlicious (talk) 00:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also added a Nutritional content section. -DDlicious (talk) 00:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source you added does not report on nutrients other than a high iron content (from what the public URL shows), which conflicts with this USDA analysis. More importantly, the source wildly describes 'medicinal' values of the dates that would never stand to scientific scrutiny in reputable literature or here, WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 02:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the suggestion. I revised and re-added the Nutritional content section, using the USDA source you suggested instead. --DDlicious (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]