Talk:Andrew Johnson's drunk vice-presidential inaugural address

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title[edit]

Did Andrew Johnson also deliver a sober vice-presidential inaugural address? If not, including "drunken" in the title of this article seems unnecessary (although it did grab my attention). Plantdrew (talk) 04:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Plantdrew He did not have any other VP addresses that I know of, LOL. But this *is* the only known drunken inaugural address in US history and/or this speech is only notable *because* he was (allegedly) blasted out of his mind. I'm not going to cry if "drunken" goes away but I also think it's the most important adjective that describes this event. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ jengod (talk) 04:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd argue that the drunkenness is what makes it notable more than anything else, so I'd keep it in the title personally.★Trekker (talk) 15:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Pre-ceremony"[edit]

It's all I can do not to change this hed to (what would seem the more accurate and appropriate) "Pre-game" . Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case It may or may not have had that subhed in an earlier draft but it was determined to be "old vandalism" and changed. :) jengod (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do “aftermath” and “consequences” need to be two different sections?[edit]

Im confused as the difference between the two sections and whether they should be combined or renamed (consequences changed to something more like “legacy” or “impact”?

Sydpresscott (talk) 03:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sydpresscott Definitely doesnt need those specific subheads. And anything in those two sections could probably be rearranged in several possible ways, and/or trimmed. Please dive in if you see fit! jengod (talk) 04:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]