Talk:Asimov's Guide to the Bible

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

minor grammatical points[edit]

'His "Guides to the Old and New Testament" include both biblical verse, footnotes, references and subject indexes.' - the word both in that sentence is meaningless, but I'm not sure what the intended sense is (should it be "both include"?) "Guides to the Old and New Testament" probably shouldn't be in quotes if it's not a title of an actual book. --Maltelauridsbrigge (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption of this article[edit]

Forgive me for this is my first try in editing anything, i wish to expand upon this page and well hereby seek permission to do so. I have the book in hand and have read it ( although not completely ) Any opinions anyone? AhazAlas (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Be bold :) -- Quiddity (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability/Critique?[edit]

This article is very small for such a massive and interesting work by an in other fields so prolific author. I would very much personally like to know if this is any sort of accepted historical anthology or if it's been critized. It's content would certainly seem somewhat controversial... Anyone who would care help me expand on it? -- CarlJohanSveningsson (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hear, hear ( Martin | talk • contribs 18:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC))[reply]