Talk:Associations of the faithful

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Catholicism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Catholicism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
WikiProject Catholicism / Canon law (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Catholicism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Heralds of the Gospel[edit]

removed this addition as not notable: The 3rd millenium had its first with the Heralds of the Gospel. A more useful addition would be a stub article on this secular institute.

Canon Law - Religious Text?[edit]

I did not know canon law was considered a primary religious text. The Bible is, maybe the Catechism of the Catholic Church is but I doubt Canon law is. Canon law is simply that, LAW, but law specifically for inside the Church. Obviously it is a primary source but I at least some citation of the appropriate law (primary source) accompanied by secondary sources seems proper for an article on a particular legal entity. >> M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemusfeci) 17:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

It seems rather strange that the quoting of the Catechism and Canon Law would be deemed "inapropriate" in an article dealing with an purely ecclesiastical entity of which there aren't likely to be any critical secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.84.228 (talk) 11:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

The box was removed since nobody has defended or fully explained its inclusion in a year. >> M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemusfeci) 17:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)