Talk:BHP Billiton Ravensthorpe Nickel Project

	Australia portal BHP Billiton Ravensthorpe Nickel Project is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Mining

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached redirect, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles

Further edits[edit]

Made further edits to the article, including details of important dates for the project's development. Article is still a work in progress. (Funkywinders (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Your recently created article BHP Billiton Ravensthorpe Nickel Project already exists as Ravensthorpe Nickel Mine! In any case, the current title would be misleading as BHP is not the owner of the project anymore. Calistemon (talk) 23:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed a merger of the two articles into Ravensthorpe Nickel Mine. Calistemon (talk) 00:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, i suggest you wait a week or two until this article is completed. I am researching and adding content specifically to BHP Billiton's failed project. The article is not intended to be about the mine as such, but about the events that lead to the failure of the project and the causes. More content will come shortly. Funkywinders (talk) 01:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The mine and the BHP project are really the same, the project became the mine and operational as such for almost a year. I can't see a difference and therefore also no need to have two separate articles. Calistemon (talk) 01:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you disregarded my comments. I asked you to please wait a week or two while I finish the article. Then you can merge to your heart's content if the wider community of Wikipedia believe the project and project financing and mine are the same. Just have some patience man. Funkywinders (talk) 02:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From reading the two articles, it seems the other article is merely in relation to the mine in ravensthorpe, while the latter is about the BHP's project in Ravensthorpe and in Queensland. Also it seems the article on the project has more detail than the former.120.16.188.129 (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected page[edit]

Page redirected to Ravensthorpe Nickel Mine. See Talk:Ravensthorpe_Nickel_Mine#Merger_proposal. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 05:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]