This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
The bulk of this article was added in 2007 in these two edits. The text looks like it originated on Banglapedia, (dead link) on before before 2005. This means it may well PD or CCbySA. OTOH it might be copyright. RichFarmbrough, 20:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]
I tried to tackle this one for copyedits, but I didn't make it much beyond the first two sections when I realized this article is mostly a jumbled mess. It's way too long, the sections aren't really in any kind of a coherent order, and it's largely unreferenced. Without a better knowledge of the subject, I wouldn't have much luck bringing this together into anything readable. I've added several tags in {{multiple issues}} because it needs more than just language cleanup. --Darkwind (talk) 04:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am about to prune this dramatically: if it isn't sourced then it is going to be deleted. The article has been a mess for years and reads like a lot of original research. Like Rich above, I rather think that a lot of it has been copied from somewhere but I cannot determine where that may be. - Sitush (talk) 18:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This should be arranged alphabetically or by date of birth. Spanning over decades we are not good enough to judge by merit and place any name anywhere. Arijit Upadhyay (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
