Talk:Burj Al Alam

Skyscrapers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Arab Emirates: Dubai Mid‑importance

	United Arab Emirates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Dubai (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Correct height[edit]

in the Emporis website the Tower is 501 meters —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.163.86 (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burj al Alam → Burj Al Alam — The second word "al" should be written as "Al." The official name of this building is written as "Burj Al Alam." The official website, the developer's website and third-party sources [1][2] all use "Burj Al Alam." This consistency shows that "Burj al Alam" is incorrect. —Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 02:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support as nominator. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 02:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support Yahel Guhan 06:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

Do we treat this name alone or folllwing the example of transcribing Arabic names? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course we would treat this name alone. It is clearly officially known as "Burj Al Alam." I should add (although not directly related to the name of this article) that the Wikipedia naming conventions for Arabic words is not always true. In Dubai, where English and Arabic are spoken widely, I have noticed that most words that have "al" in them are usually capitalized and do not contain hyphens (ex. Burj Al Alam, Burj Al Arab, Al Maktoum). The name of this tower (Burj Al Alam) has always been written that way since the beginning by the developer and local media. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 06:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Design[edit]

Would it be accurate to call Burj Al Alam a Hyperboloid structure? - Team4Technologies (talk) 07:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would believe so. Just by looking quickly at the images that are in the Hyperboloid structure article, it seems pretty much guaranteed that the Burj Al Alam is a hyperboloid structure. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 06:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pilling?[edit]

"The tower is currently under going pilling works or the tower is in Foundation stage of construction."

Is that trying to say the pilings are being driven for the foundation? See Wikipedia article "Deep foundation" for explanation. Paulburnett (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current status[edit]

From Google Maps it seems the current status of construction is "large pit filled with water." Has this thing been completely cancelled? I can't find anything about it from later than 2009; Fortune Group's website still proclaims a completion date of 2010 and the Tower's site is domain parked. Herr Gruber (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

can you please tell me if this is cancelled or not? this is another of my favorite towers and I really hope it will go up. Jawadreventon (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google maps is now showing the foundation pit's been filled in, I'd say this isn't happening. Herr Gruber (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As per the current situation of the foundation it seems that the construction of this super tall skyscraper is cancelled or they might have changed the design or reduce the height.....

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burj Al Alam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060330003117/http://www.ameinfo.com:80/81674.html to http://www.ameinfo.com/81674.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]