Talk:Chaotix

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Knuckles' Chaotix
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Knuckles' Chaotix

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 July 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Video games: Sega

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

This redirect is supported by the Sega task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (7 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (5 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (15 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

B-class assessment[edit]

Please have someone besides the originating editor assess the article beyond C class. Thanks. Also, is this a fictional organization like Team Rocket or just a group of characters? Should the infobox be changed appropriately? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems closer to start class than anything. And while I won't personally push for it alone, I really don't think this would survive an AFD or merge discussion by WP:VG. The reception section is rather short, and mostly consists of passing comments pulled from article about other things, like their game reviews or comments about the series itself. It looks a lot like all the Sonic articles that were merged years back. Sergecross73 msg me 13:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first character article, and I didn't really have another article to base it on, so I think that's why it doesn't look too good. However, I've looked back to the merger discussions from 2014 and I think that this is a different case. The IGN, Destructoid, and Sega Magazine articles are all about them, and there's a good deal of information I'm yet to implement. I'm tagging the reception section as incomplete for now, until I expand it. The reason I assessed it as a B-class article is because the creation and appearances sections are pretty good, but that's just my opinion. JOE BRO 64 20:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Xbox World preview of Sonic Heroes has a page dedicated to them, if that helps. JOE BRO 64 23:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I very much disagree that the article should be a start class article, it seems quite well written. If you can prove that it has notability, and I'd say from the sources that it does; then the article is well written. With it being a small topic, the information on offer seems to be quite large. In terms of a B class rating, I think it's between C and B, with the reception section just needing better wording for a B. The article rating system is designed for how well the information is displayed, and if the information is full. Not on the topic of the article. Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]