Talk:Charles Soludo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scammer[edit]

This is a fake profile relate to a scam letter. 203.110.243.21 (talk) 16:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodes scholar??[edit]

Nigerian Rhodes scholars? I don't think so!! Pdfpdf 15:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this footnote at Notable Rhodes Scholars. Picaroon (t)

Yes. I wrote that footnote. I have now clarified it:

Nigeria, Malta and Singapore are not (currently) one of the 14 regions that nominate their citizens/residents as Rhodes Scholars; this person's nomination can only have arisen due to being a citizen/resident of one of the 14 regions, or a region which was part of the scheme at the time of their nomination. It is not clear if, or when, these countries were ever eligible to nominate Rhodes Scholars. If they were not, then this person's nomination was due to citizenship/residence and study in some other country.

I can find no evidence that:

  • Nigeria was ever eligible to nominate Rhodes Scholars.
  • Soludo is/was a citizen or resident of any country other than Nigeria.
  • Soludo ever studied at any University in a geographic region that is/was eligible to nominate Rhodes Scholars at the time he studied there, and that he was a citizen/resident of that country at that time.

The only evidence I can find that he was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship is his biography page, and copies of it.
I can find no independent reliable source(s) to confirm the claim.
Therefore, it is highly unlikely that he was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship.

Also, I can find no independent reliable source(s) to confirm the claims of education at other institutions.

If you can find an independent reliable source that confirms any of these claims, I would be very greatful if you could bring it to my attention. Very greatful. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A good point. I've removed the info on Rhodes scholarship unless we can find a better source than the CBN website that he was part of the program. Picaroon (t) 01:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An April 2004 Thisday article, archived here, says: "Between January 1991 and July 1992, Soludo carried out several post-doctoral training works in various internationally acclaimed institutions including the Brooking Institute in the US, Rhodes research scholar at University of Oxford, University of Warwick, UK, University of Cambridge, among others." Another Thisday article, from December of that year, archived here, says "He was a Rhodes research scholar at Oxford". So the question is, is a "Rhodes research scholar" the same as a "Rhodes Scholar"? Picaroon (t) 01:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done in finding those references!
I wonder what "post-doctoral training" means? "Post-doctoral research" is a term I'm more familiar with. Perhaps it's just a terminology thing and they're two different names for the same thing? Whatever the case, eighteen months is a short period to pack in four of them; he must have been very busy! (And I don't see how he would have had the time to fit in "among others" too! But I digress ... )

On the Rhodes Scholar issue, the Rhodes Scholarship is a post-graduate award funding two years study at Oxford, resulting in a bachelor's or master's degree. If the student wishes to pursue a doctorate, (D.Phil, not Ph.D.), the student can apply during the second year, and the scholarship can be extended to a third year (subject to terms & conditions). These time-frames are inconsistent with the above statements/claims, and as there's no claim that Soludo has an Oxford degree, nor any claim that he received post-graduate training there, I'd say we can pretty safely conclude that his time at Oxford was post-doctoral research, and hence, that we was not a Rhodes Scholar. (BTW: In response to: So the question is, is a "Rhodes research scholar" the same as a "Rhodes Scholar"?, the answer is: No.)

So, I think it's "case closed" on the "Rhodes Scholar" issue, and thank you very much for your help in resolving it. Pdfpdf (talk) 07:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further confirmation on Rhodes Scholar: Nigeria used to be a constituency of the Rhodes Scholarship and there have been 14 Nigerian Rhodes Scholars in the past, of which Charles Soludo is not one (source Rhodes Trust) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toslat (talk • contribs) 03:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

419 info[edit]

Fair enough, Pdfpdf, the info is not "completely" irrelevant; "largely" irrelevant good? As Soludo has had nothing to do with these scams, I don't think it would be acceptable to connect him to them in this article without reliable sources identifying this connection as significant in some way - just citing him as one of the hundreds of Nigerians who have had their names used could bring up some concerns of implying guilt by association, and would be questionable from a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons standpoint. Furthermore, we don't even have a reliable source - an amateur scambaiter's website doesn't strike me as meeting Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Picaroon (t) 23:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You make an interesting argument.
Yes, "Soludo has had nothing to do with these scams", but there is absolutely no doubt, and gigabytes (possibly terabytes) of evidence that, as I said, "Soludo's name and position are frequently quoted by 419 scammers in their attempts to add credibility to their fraudulent activities."
Also, he's not just "one of the hundreds of Nigerians who have had their names used". It's his position, rather than his name, that they are making use of.
Unfortunately, he is much more infamous for being quoted in 419 scam "bait", than he is famous for the achievements that put him in his high profile position.
Hence, I don't think we can have a WP page about him that doesn't make some reference to this infamous use of his name and position.
I felt that "Soludo's name and position are frequently quoted by 419 scammers in their attempts to add credibility to their fraudulent activities." was NPOV. However, I agree that it doesn't address the "guilt-by-association" issue sufficiently well enough. I'll think about how to re-write it to capture that aspect too. Any suggestions would be welcomed!!
Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(P.S. Yes, I agree that the source somebody-else-put-there can hardly be classed as "reliable", but there are hundreds of other sources, some of which can be classed as reliable. At the moment, the "source" issue is a red herring which can be resolved when we have decided how to resolve the way to mention the 419 scam issue.) Pdfpdf (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If we can find a reliable source or two covering the frequent use of his name and job in 419 emails, would the following be good: "Soludo's name and position have frequently been adopted by con artists for use in advance-fee fraud." A source noting frequency is key, to distinguish him from others whose names have been used less often; such uses probably aren't notable, although you make the point that this use could be. Picaroon (t) 20:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. How about: "Soludo's name and position are frequently used by con artists in their attempts to add credibility to their advance-fee fraud activities, (also known as 419 scams.)"? I think it's important to emphasise why these people are using Charles' name, (rather than anyone else's name), and also emphasise that these fraud attempts are still active, and still frequent.
If you reply "yes", I'll go off and find some relevant references. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See urgentmessage.org for some numbers. As the head of the CBN his name is being abused very often. 77.185.6.138 (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the last comma is needed, and I think the period goes outside the parentheses. Otherwise, sounds pretty good to me. Sorry to take so long to respond. Picaroon (t) 22:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re punctuation: Agreed. Glad you like it, and glad you replied. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Dear 41.211.238.36, Thank you for your recent contributions, but in documenting such situations, one must chose one's words very carefully. My comments on my most recent edits follow:

  • "beleaguered" - You can't just place unexplained adjectives in the middle of factual text. As a minimum, you need to either provide a supporting reference, or supply an explanation. You have done neither. Until you do, no matter how accurate it might be, it is simply opinion.
  • "reported as" - What's your point here? The sources seem reliable. Are you suggesting that they are not? If so, be more direct - say they are not reliable, and provide supporting evidence.
  • The last paragraph before the "Publications" section is slowly improving, but it is still messy. Using words like "surreptitiously" (no matter how accurate) is accusatory, and needs supporting evidence. Again, you haven't supplied any. And you've made lots of other vague unsupported statements too. You must choose your words more carefully, you must be unambiguous, and you must supply supporting evidence.

Best wishes, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Profesof Soludo should know, his name is used on what I would guess are hundreds of thousands or millions of fraud spam solicitations. Some of these even go so far as claiming FBI approval and connection. If as he claims here that he is a genuine and important banking official in Nigeria, he might issue some very stern message that he has nothing to do with the constant efforts that seem to be afoot to defraud Americans of their money. HE then might also persuade the Nigerian government and their 12 or so ISP providers to stop, prosecute, and deny service to the cottage industry of constant pathological internet fraudsters. The scams run the gamut of romance, confidence, investment and charity swindles.. The criminal enterprises have become so popular that songs praising the scams are played on Nigerian radio. There also have been links established between the internet scammers and the more violent attacks on oil companies and other criminal endeavors in other parts of Africa.They use the internet scam money as seed money for further criminal enterprise.These criminal operations involve hundreds if not thousands in boiler room type operations. They are spreading to Ghana and South africa. They also have a loose affiliation with criminals who operate in the US and Europe who make calls,send phony money orders and While they are fairly obvious to the experienced eye they do manage to rope in many victims.The Nigerian Government is well aware of this and suggests it will make reforms but never does. As to the veracity of this Wikipedia article the gangsters are getting slicker at trying to look connected and legitimate by counterfeit web pages, ids, and documents and by posting dating sites filled with stolen photos,shell and misdirected urls and thousands of bogus email accounts.. - 09:00, 18 May 2009 75.49.114.221 (talk)

The above has been moved here from the article. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Charles Chukwuma Soludo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 March 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Chukwuma Soludo → Charles Soludo – Per WP:COMMONNAME Princess of Ara 18:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Princess of Ara: WP:COMMONNAME claims are inherently controversial. Moved to full discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I've been contemplating on moving it myself but haven't been WP:BOLD enough. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charles_Soludo&oldid=1210449788"