Talk:Coast Daylight

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Passenger trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	May 22, 2017

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Assessment project California[edit]

this article lacks breadth. it is scarcely more than list and tabular information with a limited and decent history summary. Anlace 22:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OP-16094.jpg[edit]

Image:OP-16094.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discontinuance date?[edit]

This article's a bit vague on the matter, but the discontinuance date should probably be moved into the mid-1970s (whenever Amtrak dropped the name, we need a source on that). @Slambo: thoughts? Mackensen (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved: no objections Ground Zero | t 15:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coast Daylight (SP train) → Coast Daylight – Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and really the only topic. Amtrak continued to operate this train 1971-1974; it was clearly a continuation and not a new service, though that portion of the article needs to be rewritten. If and when California and Amtrak revive direct LA-SF service Coast Daylight (Amtrak train) would be the obvious location. Mackensen (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support the move, and delete the disambiguation page per WP:TWODAB; a hatnote will suffice to distinguish the two topics. Steel1943 (talk) 23:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.