Jump to content

Talk:D-STAR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:D-STAR/Comments)

No Multipath?

[edit]

This article states: "The quality of the data received is also better than an analog signal at the same signal strength, as long as the signal is above a minimum threshold, and there is no multipath propagation."

The Wiki page on multipath states correctly: In digital radio communications (such as GSM) multipath can cause errors and affect the quality of communications. The errors are due to intersymbol interference (ISI). Equalisers are often used to correct the ISI. Alternatively, techniques such as orthogonal frequency division modulation and rake receivers may be used."

The statement about no multipath appears to be unsupported, unless D-STAR is immune to ISI or phase ambiguity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.142.169 (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The second comma in the sentence significantly altered what the sentence should be saying. Akld guy (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable lede

[edit]

The lede for this article is very misleading. It needs a re-write.

The first paragraph states: "D-STAR (Digital Smart Technologies for Amateur Radio) is a digital voice and data protocol specification for amateur radio. The system was developed in the late 1990s by the Japan Amateur Radio League and uses frequency-division multiple access and minimum-shift keying in its packet-based standard. There are newer digital modes (Codec2, for example) that have been adapted for use by amateurs, but D-STAR was the first that was designed specifically for amateur radio."

D-STAR is *not* FDMA. There are no sub-carriers being transmitted by a D-STAR repeater. D-Star has no control channel that would help mobiles to find an available carrier.

D-STAR does not use MSK. D-STAR's modulation scheme is GMSK.

D-STAR (DV) is not packet based. Although the digital transmission has a header that contains call signs for routing, the subsequent voice information is sent as a continuous stream, rather than individual packets, each with their own headers.

Codec2 is not a digital mode, it is a codec type. D-STAR uses DVSI's AMBE proprietary codec for encoding voice. Codec2 is another codec that is open source. Other examples of digital voice modes on ham radio include [Digital_mobile_radio|DMR] and System Fusion.

D-STAR has two modes: DV - Digital voice and DD - Digital Data. DD is packet based and can carry voice packets. These two modes should be introduced in the lede, and the details should be given below in the main part of the article.

The second paragraph states: "Several advantages of using digital voice modes are that it uses less bandwidth than older analog voice modes such as amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, and single sideband. The quality of the data received is also better than an analog signal at the same signal strength, as long as the signal is above a minimum threshold and as long as there is no multipath propagation."

While it is true that digital voice modes have several advantages over analog voice, this article is not about digital voice modes, it's about D-STAR. The main advantages of D-STAR (as a system) need to be presented here.

Although D-STAR occupies half (6.25 KHz) of a Narrow-Band FM transmission (12 KHz), Single-Sideband (3 KHz) is still narrower in bandwidth.

The quality of D-STAR received voice is not as clear as conventional FM under full quieting. However, under noisy conditions, D-STAR performs better. (Reference needed).

The last line states: D-STAR compatible radios are manufactured by Icom, Kenwood, and FlexRadio Systems.[1]

The reference appears to be a blatant advertising for FlexRadio.

(edited)  kgrr talk 13:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on D-STAR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G3 Gateway software

[edit]

I understand that there is a new version of the gateway software, known as G3. If I can learn enough about it I will write something. One of the few things I have heard is that it does not work well with 1.2 GHz Digital Data. ;Bear (talk) 00:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been several further developments that render much of the main article badly outdated. For example Icom Gateway software has moved from G3.0 to first G3.1 to support new-generation repeaters and most recently G3.2 (May-2024) which supports Alma Linux v9. The vast majority of systems utilise G3.x Mjnmjn (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]