Talk:Daniel Band

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank You[edit]

Daniel Band...Thank You for your Music. I only knew a few people who knew of you, But your music rocked for Jesus and it was good! It charged me with doing all I could for Jesus. What more can I say..."Free from Sin" and the song that went "Come in to my Life" were leap years ahead of must artist at the time. Thank You, Steve, Houston,Texas.

  • Their song "I'm Sorry" from their first album was my favourite. Paradiso 05:17, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Band - I too thank you for the timely music. I was coming out of secular rock during the early 80's and your music was instrumental in my transition to christian rock and above all, my still rock solid relationship with Jesus. My deep heartfelt thank you to every member of the band. I still enjoy listening to your music to this day. I hope to someday see your concert, which I have not yet been able to attend. God's blessings be upon you all! Steve - Meridian, Idaho —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.129.135.243 (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry, but you know......what...about The Daniel Band??[edit]

Just curious to know why you are trying to cyber-bully in regards to Canadian Christian rockers?? 1)Daniel Band won the 2011 Lifetime Award, following Connie Scott's father, Connie herself, Hockus Pick, and GB Shea....I've touched one of the awards the night after it was presented! 2) Wayne Morgan is now in Kenya a BUWC Mission Partner. 3) They were at Cornerstone 2000; want to see a programme..

This is one reason why I'm rarely on wikipedia. If you want to be a revisionist historian, go ahead. I've got better things to do with my life, than put up with childish antics from someone using a pseudonym of a German War historian.

I'm not cyber-bullying. I don't think you know what the term means when you use it like that. I suppose you're talking about my adding citation needed to additions. My actions are simply attempting to maintain quality on Wikipedia. I have nothing against the band, except maybe that they haven't re-issued all of their material on CD (my vinyl is wearing out). I'm just aware of what Wikipedia is supposed to look like and I want the quality of this article to be adequate.
When adding any material to Wikipedia, except for common knowledge, it must be referenced with reliable sources. See WP:RS. So a program for CStone 2000 is not a reliable source. A write-up in Cornerstone HM, or and publication that covered the event would be. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No one is questioning your knowledge of the band, only whether it's referenced or not. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As a casual observer, this edit could be construed as bad faith. It would be better to call edits like this unhelpful or unreferenced, so as not to antagonize or discourage a well-meaning editor. Calling a good faith edit vandalism certainly isn't bullying, but it is not the most polite way to go.--¿3family6 contribs 03:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No. The removal, without explanation, of referenced material while adding a misleading comment is blatant vandalism. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Where is that in the edit? I can't find it.--¿3family6 contribs 14:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Some rewording, link to GMA lifetime award" when the edit removes the three CN tags. That's not rewording, that's avoiding clarifying the questions. I believe I've found a reference for the middle one of those three CN tags in the Encyclopedia of CCM. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That would be disruptive editing, not vandalism. But I'll just drop the subject. The situation has clearly been sorted out, further discussion will only aggravate.--¿3family6 contribs 18:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Associated acts[edit]

Per WP:BRD, Template:Infobox musical artist clearly states that the associated_acts template is to be used to list "Other acts with which this act has ... toured with as a single collaboration act playing together". As stated in the Encyclopedia of CCM, "For a time the group toured as Larry Norman's backing band." (p. 232). I'm not sure how that's not a collaboration act playing together? The Rez association is more tenuous and certainly referenced, but Norman should be restored. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry about the Norman one. It isn't mentioned in the article, so I didn't know.--¿3family6 contribs 20:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I will expand the article with the E of CCM material this weekend. Some great stuff in the one column devoted to the band, some of which is missing, and as noted, one thing that has a CN is confirmed there! Oh, and Full Circle Jesus Music's podcast released last night featured music from and about Canada, and of course DB is mentioned. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]