Talk:Eggslut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edits to the article[edit]

It would seem that 24.211.172.115 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is opposed to my attempts to bring this article into line with WP:RS and WP:OR when the whole page is a bad translation of the Japanese language edition, where they do not have as many guidelines and standards as the English Wikipedia does on inclusion.

  • The recipe is unsourced
  • The various explanations of what the Japanese thought are related dishes are unsourced
  • The explanations of the dish's appearance on Japanese daytime TV is unsourced

This whole article is based on a bad interpretation of the Japanese language page and this IP editor, who appears to be someone just trying to get my goat because his only other edit on Wikipedia is about a Gamergate related topic.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out that Eggslut has a physical location now and isn't just a foodtruck. Can this be corrected?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 09:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. - Please "reactivate" the edit request (by removing |answered=yes from the template) when you provide a clear "change X to Y" request (or specific text to add), with some sort of reliable source. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  14:00, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 18 December 2014[edit]

Please add as a third and fourth paragraph: The Grand Central Market in Los Angeles where Eggslut opened a brick and mortar shop, was named as one of the top 10 new US restaurant's by Bon Appetit for 2014.[1]

The restaurant's name has been included in a list of risqué names by KCET[2] and the New York Times, with Eli Altman stating that having a boring name may mean that an advertisement doesn't attract attention [3] and 65 percent of respondents of a KCET stating they would be more likely to visit a restaurant with a "gross name".[2] Samuel Muston wrote that "Eggslut" falls into a category of "quirky" restaurant names, but that "the collision of the word 'egg' and 'slut' doesn't exactly encourage the appetite".[4] -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DoneMr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ CBS Staff. "Bon Appetit's top 10 best new restaurants in U.S. - CBS News". CBS News. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  2. ^ a b Katherine Spiers (October 3, 2013). "Sexy Restaurant Names: Do We Like Them?". KCET. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  3. ^ JOHN GROSSMANN (APRIL 23, 2014). "Risqué Names Reap Rewards for Some Companies". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 December 2014. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ Samuel Muston: (12 June 2014). "What's in a name? If you're christening a restaurant, then quite a lot". The Independent. Retrieved 18 December 2014.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)

Recipe[edit]

Here is the recipe, but I don't know how you work that into the article in an encyclopedic manner. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:50, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need the recipe? All we need to do is explain it's a coddled egg on top of potatoes.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:51, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
probably not, but you had mentioned above that one of the issues was the recipe wasnt sourced, so if the lack of source was the only issue, it would have been resolved. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eggslut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]