Talk:Evolution (advertisement)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Evolution (advertisement) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Evolution (advertisement) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
April 24, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
December 13, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 20, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Dove's Evolution is the first entry to win two Grand Prix awards at the Cannes Lions International Advertising Festival?
Current status: Good article

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Evolution (advertisement) was copied or moved into Dove Campaign for Real Beauty with this edit on April 24, 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Copied section from Evolution (ad)[edit]

What do I do when important sources are on an artist myspace blog, and wikipedia doesn't allow linking to myspace blogs?

What exactly are these sources? Post them on the talk page at minimum. Diemunkiesdie 06:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review: On Hold[edit]

I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold until the following issues are addressed. As you address each issue, either strike through the statement/place a check mark next to the issue and state how you addressed it. If you disagree with a particular issue, state your rationale for doing so after the issue in question so a compromise can be reached.

"the Film Grand Prix and two Gold prizes at the London International Awards,[18]," Remove the comma after the inline citation.
"...and was produced on a budget of £2000 by production company Blink Productions." Add an inline citation for the budget amount.
"and has since climbed to 1 million." Can a source be provided for this figure?
"After bras are removed" Fix the wikilink for "bras" it currently goes to a dab page.
Wherever you think appropriate, include some more brief information about the Dove Self-Esteem Fund.
Again, if possible, see if any free images can be found relating to the topic.

This article covered the ad well and the video was quite interesting to watch. The article didn't have too many problems, and the above issues shouldn't take long to fix. I have left the article on hold for seven days for the issues to be addressed. If they are fixed in this time, I will pass the article. If not, the article may be failed and can be renominated at WP:GAN. If necessary to address the above issues, and progress is being made, an extension may be allowed. If you have any questions or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed most, but again, no free use images around. I might try to get in touch with Ogilvy&Mather, see if they'd be willing to provide a shot of the trophy or of one of the names mentioned in the article. Couldn't find the refs I used for the budget and viewing figures for Slob Evolution, so I've removed them. I suspect it was from The Encyclopedia of Major Marketing Campaigns Vol 2. by Thomas Riggs, which has a section on the Campaign for Real Beauty, but I don't have ready access to it any more. If and when I can check, I'll re-add the figures. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 19:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA passed[edit]

Good job with addressing the above issues, so I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. If you can get a free image that would be great, so best wishes in getting permission. I have worked with multiple film/actor articles, and I know how difficult it can be to get free images. Continue to improve the article, making sure that all new information is properly sourced and neutral. Also, see if there are any related WikiProject banners that can be added to this talk page.

Also, to anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the very large backlog. Instructions can be found here. Each new reviewer that helps to review articles will help to reduce the time that articles wait to be reviewed. Keep up the good work, and I hope that you continue to bring articles up to Good Article status (these articles on the ad campaigns are interesting to read!). If anyone disagrees with this review, an alternate opinion can be sought at Good article reassessment. If you have any further questions about this review, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes[edit]

I ran out of space in my edit summary for the latest changes, which altered content submitted by User:66.28.244.34. I'll summarise them here:

The piece itself is Canadian, and the primary author of the article is British, so Commonwealth English (deodourant, centred) should be used per the Manual of Style
A few other changes per the MoS: Removed definite articles from the section headers, and commas have been moved back outside quotation marks. I may've shifted some outside italics marks by mistake; if so, feel free to revert em back again.
One fact (Betts being unrecognisable after the workup) needs a cite. I've added a tag for now, but I'll fix it myself when I get back home.
Switched "278,000 distinct times" to "received 280,000 hits". The former reads slightly oddly to me.

All other content changes look like improvements to me, so I've left them as was :) 62.231.146.140 (talk) - GeeJo not signed in

Official website[edit]

Website that is offered on the top right hand side of the page no longer works. Maybe it could be changed to link to the Dove Real Beauty Campaign Website or the "Real Beauty" section of Dove's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleonor.thomas (talk • contribs) 21:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Evolution (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

Should we subject this article for peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Evolution (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Evolution (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evolution (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109214224/http://www.oneclub.org/oc/magazine/articles/?id=70 to http://www.oneclub.org/oc/magazine/articles/?id=70

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]