Talk:Expedition 23

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Science & education C‑class Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.

Three resident RSA cosmonauts[edit]

Is Expedition 23 the first resident crew to include three RSA cosmonauts? If so, (and assuming a reliable source can be found), it seems noteworthy. (sdsds - talk) 23:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It won't be the first time there will be 3 Russians on ISS. There has been many times when one 3 man crew handed over to another that there was 3 Russians. Look at Expedition 1 and Expedition 2 (2 Russians on Expedition 1, 1 Russian on Expedition 2). It will be the first time there will be 3 onboard for an extended period of time. I don't know of any sources, but it could be mentioned that it is the first time 3 Russians are onboard for an extended period of time.--NavyBlue84 00:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]