Talk:Firoz Shah palace complex

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Haryana / History / Protected areas Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.
	This article is supported by the Protected areas of India workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in April 2022.

Jan 2022 edits[edit]

Working through the copy edits in chunks. Got up to the Royal Palace section. I'm not sure about keeping the paragraph on artillery in the History section. I believe the original author included it because the fort was made obsolete by artillery, but couldn't find any sources to support my hunch. Nben7070 (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022 completion of copyedit and assessment[edit]

I've completed the request for copyedit, save for perhaps some minor style/grammar errors I might have missed and assessed the article a Low-importance C-class. I would argue for B-class if statements or claims lacking in citations were provided and the list of references expanded. ★Ama ^TALK ^CONTRIBS 17:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]