Talk:Free Brazil Movement

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil: Government and laws Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Facebook[edit]

What's up with this apparently gizmodo article which says facebook removed pages from all branches of Brazilian politics? The google translated version of the article seems pretty clear and uncontroversial to me. "In the list are four regional pages of MBL, three pages of support for presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro, pages that imitate press vehicles like 'G1 - The News Portal', pages that could be considered of opposition, like 'Feminism, Liberty and Voluntarism' and dozens of others that apparently did not have political content, such as The Formula of Love, Job Channel,Top Animes Forever, Fame, among others." Pelirojopajaro (talk) 10:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The info that is found on this website actually was provided by the movement itself. I tried to find other sources on the matter, that could independently backed this information, but couldn't find any. But, all in all, source says "could be considered", and for some reason it's posted in the article as if it was a fact when the source itself cast doubts about it? WP:STICKTOSOURCE and no original research, please. Even the person who added the info in the first place has recognized it's mistake. Coltsfan (talk) 11:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

by "this website" you mean gizmodo? But they link to a list of the pages removed which is on a government website (MPF), not an MBL website. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 11:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was not questioning what websites were taken down or not, i'm talking about the part that they are "opposition pages" (sic). That's a conclusion that, like i point it out, the source itself questions that. Coltsfan (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]