Talk:From Within (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the From Within (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on September 16, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Citation dump

From Within -- Fangoria review
Tribeca Critics Notebook 3 -- brief & negative mention
Solstice Film Festival: The comedy! The horror! The birdwatching!

Headlines. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Papamichael should not be identified as an "acclaimed" cinematographer because this is a peacock term. In addition, a lot of relevant production information such as financing was removed from the article inappropriately. Just because one does not think it's interesting does not mean it is not relevant to the film as a whole. In addition, the two citations talking about the buzz and the tepid reception are fully acceptable citations -- wins at a non-notable film festival do not override these facts. If the film festival was notable, we could mention the wins after the talk about the buzz and tepid reception. We don't remove them entirely to make the film positive of our own accord, especially when we consider the cinematographer "acclaimed". However, the Fangoria review seems acceptable as an EL, but it should be incorporated into the article if possible. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting this, the anonymous editor is trying to add without citation that the film "received an ovation" at the Tribeca Film Festival and is trying to downplay its cited "mediocre reception". The person who wrote "mediocre reception" was not a reviewer as the editor believes, but instead a writer for The Hollywood Reporer who wrote an overall perspective of how the film was received at the festival. There is no citation to support that From Within was "well received by critics" as the anonymous editor claims. I also do not believe that the Solstice Film Festival is a notable enough event to warrant mention of the film's prestige there, but for the sake of compromise, I will include the festival in the article. If this film did perform well at Tribeca and was badly reported, then surely there will be reliable sources that indicate strong performances later on. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot be the judge of whether or not Solstic Film festival meets some level of objective criteria, you can only make subjective judgements, just as you require in the same sentence that facts need outside citation and confirmation of multiple observers @ Erik. What is this lunacy going on here? Just keep all information in wikipedia do not make personal judgements. Rook2pawn (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aiden or Aidan

The entire article seems to alternate between using Aiden and Aidan as a name for the male lead in the movie.

Aidan seems to be the correct spelling though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xianwei (talk • contribs) 13:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all instances of "Aiden" to "Aidan". If you've seen the film, would you be able to write a shorter summary? We should aim for between 400 and 700 words, and the current summary is nearly 1,400 words. Here are some guidelines: WP:FILMPLOT. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Believer

What does "cling to their beliefs", and "non-believer" mean? Is this a reference to religion?101.98.163.177 (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on From Within (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080414230621/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/film/news/e3ia51ae029511c6ba9a158359f8c6848e4 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3ia51ae029511c6ba9a158359f8c6848e4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]