Talk:Gauge Change Train

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freight?[edit]

What about freight/goods/merchandise wagons and locomotives? Tabletop (talk) 09:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting dates[edit]

The article says "From April 2001, the train was shipped to the Transportation Technology Center in Pueblo, Colorado, U.S.A. for an extended period of high-speed endurance running until January 2001" which seems to go against the arrow of time.--SilasW (talk) 07:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting that. It was a typo (should have been 1999, not 2001), which I have now corrected. --DAJF (talk) 08:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Free Gauge Train?[edit]

Should this be moved to Free Gauge Train, since that seems to be the primary name these days? Jpatokal (talk) 00:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wondered about this when I first created the article. My view was (and still is) that while the train is widely referred to in Japan as the "フリーゲージトレイン" (i.e. "Free Gauge Train"), knowledgeable English-language news reports and the official details published by the RTRI tend to refer to it as the "Gauge Change Train". Its official classification is also "GCT". These were the reasons why I chose the "Gauge Change Train" name. --DAJF (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but Googlefight [1] now gets around twice as many hits for FGT than for CGT, and we're using FGT elsewhere in Wikipedia. So it's starting to look like common use trumps official.
Also, ja:軌間可変電車 says GCT is actually short Gauge Changeable Train or Gauge Convertible Train, and that FGT is the correct name of the Japanese variant, which is this article's topic. Jpatokal (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware of that Googlefight site, but how does it come up with those figures? When I do a regular Google search for "Gauge Change Train" (enclosed in quotes), I get 35,600 hits, whereas "Free Gauge Train" gets 19,900, which suggests that "Gauge Change Train" qualifies as the common name as well as the official name. Anyway, as this article has tended to rely overly on Japanese language sources up until now, I have added a couple more English language references in the "Further reading" section, which hopefully demonstrate common usage. --DAJF (talk) 03:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think Googlefight doesn't quote, but then again, your search doesn't exclude Wikipedia-derived content. But let's leave it at GCT for now and revisit the situation in a few years. Jpatokal (talk) 02:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO, Gauge Change Train is more meaningful than Free Gauge Train. Tabletop (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three gauges at once?[edit]

A gauge change train (GCT) has moveable wheels that are against one "crimp" for one gauge and the opposite "crimp" for the other gauge.

Can this system work for 3 gauges at the same time, where the wheel is not held against a middle "crimp" for the middle gauge?

With the proposed Bering Strait Tunnel, three gauges might be desirable, namely:

  • 1067mm (Japan)
  • 1435mm (Japan HS, Korea, Canada and US)
  • 1520mm (Former Soviet countries). Tabletop (talk) 09:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gauge Change Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gauge Change Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link[edit]

This link is broken http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/social_affairs/AJ201205060013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JKBDre (talk • contribs) 22:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Thanks for pointing out the dead link. You can tag such links within the article using the {{Dead link}} template, and if you have time, you can actually check for archived versions of the webpage yourself using the Wayback Machine site. --DAJF (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gauge Change Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gauge_Change_Train&oldid=1202226792"