This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
positive case of hbv in immunised individual
positive case of hbv in immunised individual. need to knw abt any immunisation after the occurence of the infection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 10:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Please note admonition above, "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hepatitis B virus article." Also explained at the Talk page guidelines. Do you have a suggestion for improving this article? --Scray (talk) 01:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
The 'simplified' picture in the morphology section is pretty bad and should probably be changed or removed, as it might confuse people seeking to visualize the HBV particle. In the picture, HBcAg or 'Core' antigen is labeled as a series of red circles surrounding a blue icosahedron containing DNA. In actuality, the HBcAg protein actually is what the icosahedral capsid is built from. The picture kind of implies that the icosahedral capsid is constructed of some un-named molecules, then surrounded by a sphere of HBcAg proteins; which is not correct. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
There's another issue with the picture, I believe. The full DNA strand should be the negative-sense (-) one, as is shown in the genome picture of the article, and not the positive-sense (+) one. The negative-sense one is the one with the DNApol at one ending, as well. (Pepemonbu (talk) 19:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC))
I agree. I have removed the diagram. It seems to have been altered since I drew the original cartoon. I will try to replace it with a more accurate version. Graham Colm (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)