Talk:History and use of the single transferable vote

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History and use of the single transferable vote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to clarify when an individual voter can discover how their vote was ultimately distributed[edit]

For the individual voter to be able to discover how their vote was distributed depends on two things: the system needs to have been deterministic (I think the term "modern" may have been used to rule out systems using random choices when transfering surpluses), and sufficient information needs to be provided about the counting process. Complete vote data (as are available for the Scottish Council elections of 2012 and 2017) certainly allows this; but that's more than necessary: for those Council elections output files were produced describing how many votes were transferred and at what value at each stage, which provides the required info. For Meek STV, it is indeed simpler: all you need are the final keep values for each candidate. Dmollison (talk) 11:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose we merge History and use of the single transferable vote with History and use of instant-runoff voting. Technically speaking these systems are the same thing (with the IRV variant just being the STV when used to elect one person). Most of the countries listed use both at some level, and there is lots of overlap in the content that could be better covered in one article.

Any thoughts?

Bluealbion (talk) 22:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, but under which name? Kahlores (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, until and unless there is a consensus to merge Instant-runoff voting and Single transferable vote; consensus failed for that in the past (referred to in [[1]]). If there was a proposal to merge those, it should be from the main pages, not on the history pages. Klbrain (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A common history and of ranked-choice voting (or history and of preferential voting) is a possible alternative, but that would further the scope. the name STV covers IRV on some countries common usage (as STV by-elections are held by IRV if needed), but then the main pages should be combined by this logic as well, and that I would oppose as IRV definitely deserves its own article (otherwise FPTP and STNV would also be the same, and even FPTP and plurality voting are two seperate articles) Rankedchoicevoter (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing the merge proposal, given the uncontested objections with stale discussion. There also doesn't seem to be consensus or support for alternative models. Klbrain (talk) 09:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia[edit]

@Bduke, Tk420, Byzantium Purple, Marksomnian, Dr. British12, Divad42, Equalhared123, Thefalseking, Consciousbutnotinert, Migaslet00, Cao Cao (Mengde), Éireann, Numberguy6, Hàlian, Twitbookspacetube, Eire2020, Lancashire2789, Aficionado538, KALABUK, Thepottato, and Yutrobog:

I've just discovered by happenstance that Estonia experienced one election under STV in 1990, something barely written anywhere on Wikipedia. So I've just added a section on it. I'm pinging users who included Template:User Pro Single Transferable Voting as a userbox, just in case some of you are academics working in the field, or more likely passionate about election methods and supporters of voting reform. Kahlores (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pity they did not use it more often!--Bduke (talk) 08:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]