Talk:History of Evansville, Indiana

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:History of Evansville, Indiana. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs) 18:42, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Gonna do a comprehensive review later, but first of all I would like to see the lede expanded. Some detailed mention of pre-Anglo-American settlement and more information about the founding of the city, as well as its merger with Lamasco. You could have all that in a paragraph perhaps twice as large as what is currently the size of the lede. Then you could have another paragraph of similar size detailing industrial development and other important issues post-Civil War including 20th and 21st Century developments, such as the founding of the Indiana Klan and the 2005 tornado.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 18:42, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I am failing this nomination. While there are some issues that could easily be resolved, my review of just two sections revealed numerous blatant violations of local government copyrights. If you are unaware, the governments of Evansville and Vanderburgh County do retain rights to their material. There is also at least one paragraph that was copied word-for-word from a press article. Close paraphrasing or outright copy-pasting of such material is a serious violation and you should rewrite these sections in your own words and properly attribute the sources you are using for this material.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of Evansville, Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/population/documentation/twps0027/tab12.txt
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080411163028/http://www.centerforhistory.org/indiana_history_main7.html to http://www.centerforhistory.org/indiana_history_main7.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5a1zWeTTp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww4.ncdc.noaa.gov%2Fcgi-win%2Fwwcgi.dll%3Fwwevent%7Estorms to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7Estorms
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.courierpress.com/ecp/news/article/0%2C1626%2CECP_734_4239245%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)