Talk:Italian American

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Ethnic groups (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United States (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Italy (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 



Italian Constitution[edit]

"The newly created Italian constitution, drafted after unification in 1861, heavily favored the North" This is not only lacking a quote, but also highly debatable (and debated). I am no experienced editor or the like and I do not want to plainly intervene on the text, but this is completely POV. --Theorigenist (talk) 10:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

You all right, I just removed the first sentence, which is plainly wrong, since the only constitution in the history of Italy is the one of 1947. As everyone knows (or should know) the kingdom of Italy adopted no "new constitution", but left in force the "statuto albertino" (that is, the constitution of the kingdom of Sardinia) of 1848. On the other side, as of today is largely accepted that the unification favored the north. Alex2006 (talk) 12:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Max Lucado[edit]

The author Max Lucado does not appear to be of Italian descent. He is quoted as saying: “Actually, though there is a strain of Italian Lucado’s, we really trace our ancestry to the French Huguenots and apparently, from what we understand our ancestry came out of the Huguenots revolution, came to England and then came to the US in the late 1700s. It was originally spelled in our case Lucadeaux, so it had a French spelling.” (www.assistnews.net/Stories/2012/s12080147.htm) Philantonia (talk) 18:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Italian American label.[edit]

In the section to the right is a fact box with pictures of Italian Americans and it says only Italian American. On most pages of Ethnic groups it lists the label in both the English or language of the specific Wiki article as well as the native language. I put Italo-Americani under Italian Americans because that is the native Italian word for Italian Americans. I looked at many other ethnic groups and saw the same so it should be the same for Italians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkeating5683 (talkcontribs) 01:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Enrico Fermi[edit]

From Enrico Fermi's official Nobel Prize Biography (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1938/fermi-bio.html), we read that:

In 1944, Fermi became an American citizen, and at the end of the war (1946) he accepted a professorship at the Institute for Nuclear Studies of the University of Chicago, a position which he held until his untimely death in 1954. Philantonia (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Agree 100%, also because one definition does not exclude the other: each "generation 0" Italian American is by definition 100% Italian. When he landed in New York with his family escaping from fascist Italy he told his wife: "We just founded the American branch of the Fermi family". Alex2006 (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Notable Selection and Replacement[edit]

Once again we are faced with having to establish some kind of objective standard for the selection and possible replacement of Notables. I believe the Notables should support the article, in the sense they are important to the Italian American story the article deals with. The Notables, in my opinion, should not be chosen simply because they enjoy a certain (possibly transient) popularity in American culture, or have received a lot of current media coverage. I would suggest that an objective set of standards (consistent with similar articles on other nationality groups) should consist of:

(a) The person has made a noteworthy and positive contribution to American society and/or culture, and is general recognized in American society for this contribution

(b) The person's contribution is significant enough to withstand the test of time

(c) The person should not be controversial, or objectionable to many (especially Italian Americans)

I believe the removal/replacement of a Notable should be treated the same as removing sourced information. They should not be removed without a discussion on the Talk page.

Recently, Rudy Giuliani was replaced in the gallery of Notables by Bill DiBlasio. Giuliani is very well known and respected for his two terms as mayor of New York, and for his leadership after the 911 attack, during which time he was referred to as "America's Mayor". On the other hand, Bill DiBlasio is a new mayor that has already come under a lot of major criticism. What his legacy will be is unclear but, by no objective standard, can he be viewed as "notable". This replacement is a good illustration of how the arbitrary designation of who is a Notable, and who is not, will lead to shear chaos. How long will DiBlasio last if he is retained as a Notable? Philantonia (talk) 18:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Stallone has become almost an American icon because of his immensely popular "Rocky" films. Turturro is far less known and appreciated. Using the criterion that Turturro is 100% Italian versus 50% for Stallone is a meaningless and arbitrary criterion. Philantonia (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
So if we're going by notability then why isn't Ariana Grande included in the page? She's more renowned than some people in the current image box. ShawntheGod (talk) 21:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
The criteria given above for "notability" seem very reasonable to me, but if you have a better concept, or want to enhance it, please share your thoughts. Regardless of what set of criteria is used, the idea that anyone can arbitrarily substitute one person for another is in my opinion fundamentally a bad idea, and would probably lead to a never-ending free-for-all. Philantonia (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Obviously "notability" plays a part here because we can't include any ol' Italian-American who exists, but people of some notability and merit. Sylvester is more renowned than John, but in my opinion John is a much more refined actor and grossly underrated. Sylvester can remain in the article. ShawntheGod (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Replacement of Lady Gaga as a Notable[edit]

Lady Gaga’s act is viewed by many as vulgar, obscene and even pornographic (the term used to characterize her act by protesters in South Korea). Recently, she had another performer vomit on her during an act. She is certainly not anyone who can, by any objective standard, be viewed as “notable”.

Liza Minelli, on the other hand, ranks among the great female entertainers of the second half of the 20th century. She starred in movies (Oscar for Best Actress in a Supporting Role) and Broadway shows, and had a singing voice that was second only to that of her mother, Judy Garland.

I am replacing Gaga by Minelli in the gallery of Notables based on the fact that Gaga is, to say the least, a very controversial choice. Philantonia (talk) 15:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

naughty?? this is a problem for the land of Mussolini and Berlusconi? I think not. Wiki is not in the morals-policing business. Rjensen (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
The last time I checked, we are living in the land of America, not the land of Mussolini and Berlusconi. Do you believe that an objective set of standards should be applied in selecting Notables, or should we make it a popularity contest? Philantonia (talk) 18:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, neither Mussolini nor Berlusconi are in the collage of the famous Italians, and also Hitler is not present among the most notable Austrians, so I think that after all in Wikipedia too we are doing some moral policy...I vote for Minelli. Alex2006 (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Mussolini was in fact the big hero to Italian Americans in the 1920s and 1930s. There was a big photo of him in my family's restaurant until the FBI ordered it removed. What I reject is the idea of filtering the article to remove accurate info that partisans find in any way embarrassing. That sort of censorship is antithetical to the spirit & rules here. I think there is little of that in this article, but announcing that the images should be filtered to bolster It-Am images is crossing the line, in my opinion. Rjensen (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Mussolini was the big hero of the Italians all around the world in those years. I understand what you mean, but what I said is that the notability of people appearing on these collages is "filtered" everywhere in Wikipedia. The bad guys, although super-notables, like Hitler in Austria, (or Al Capone here) never win. Alex2006 (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
The idea of "filtering the article" via the selection of Notables does not by definition apply if an objective set of standards is used in the process. Then, the element of subjectivity is totally removed. I suggested a set of criteria for the selection of Notables that you may wish to comment on, and possibly improve. One of the standards is the person should not be considered offensive or controversial, which definitely appears to be the unwritten rule in other similar articles. Philantonia (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
That's exactly what I was trying to explain with my examples above. Alex2006 (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)