This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Speed Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of speed skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Speed SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Speed SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Speed SkatingSpeed skating articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
May have been vandalized, "Charles Jew"?, "Tom Fagot"?
--Keg003 22:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.174.165.55 (talk) 22:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Additions that have been challenged, and that lack both wp articles and appropriate refs, should not be added back to the article (as Night of the Big Wind did), per both wp:LISTPEOPLE and wp:CHALLENGED, without an appropriate inline citation or appropriate refs.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you had done your homework, you could have seen that the skaters I re-added, all had won medeals on major tournaments. And then they qualify on the same guidelines that you used to remove them. Night of the Big Windtalk 05:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see -- which I have already pointed you to -- wp:LISTPEOPLE, wp:CHALLENGED, and wp:BURDEN. Red-linked names, that lack appropriate refs, which have been removed should not be restored -- unless you write an article turning it into a bluelink, or supply appropriate inline refs. Please also see wp:CHALLENGED, which also speak as to your obligation if you are restoring uncited material that has been removed or otherwise challenged. To the point, see wp:BURDEN.
I had removed the red-linked, uncited name. Citing wp:LISTPEOPLE. You restored it as a redlinked, uncited name. That was not appropriate, per the foregoing. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My advice is to look first at the Dutch version of this article. If the skater has no article there, it is hopeless for him/her. If there is an article, you can request atranslation of it. Night of the Big Windtalk 05:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My advice is for you to not violate wp:LISTPEOPLE and wp:CHALLENGED in the future, and to respect wp:BURDEN. I would also appreciate it if you would not follow me around the Project -- only to revert my edit deleting this red-linked American in direct contravention of wp:LISTPEOPLE and wp:CHALLENGED. Please take this as a civil warning/request. Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have to hide something thst you don't want a critical look at your work? Night of the Big Windtalk 06:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Umm -- I just requested that you not violate -- as you have here -- wp:LISTPEOPLE and wp:CHALLENGED, all as part of a pattern of following me around the Project, and without good cause. Clearly, your violations of wp:LISTPEOPLE and wp:CHALLENGED reflect lack of good cause, and the fact that they come as part of a pattern of following makes them especially disruptive.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
