Talk:MDaemon
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MDaemon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Notability dispute[edit]
Currently, we've got six independent sources about MDaemon, explicitly not just repeating press releases but providing significant coverage and reviews over more than a decade. This is a lot more than similar articles provide. In my humble opinion, the SecuritySpace survey alone establishes notability.
Exactly when do we have sufficient sources? With ten? Twenty? --Zac67 (talk) 17:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed the maintenance tag for now. With a non-enthusiastic "Weak keep" in the latest AfD discussion I am hopefully not seen as biased, but the latest consensus was relatively clear. Of course eventual substantial concerns should be adressed, but such concerns should be raised on the article talkpage in a more concrete manner first. GermanJoe (talk) 12:22, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
