Talk:Mountain nyala

Mountain nyala has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 29, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Mountain nyala appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the mountain nyala, featured on the obverse of the Ethiopian ten santim coin (pictured), was the last species of large antelope to be discovered in Africa?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mountain nyala.

Wikipedia

Untitled[edit]

Mountain nyala are often confused with the lesser kudu but actually live in very different habitats....they are of the same family or (spiral horned antelope)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mountain nyala/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 23:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. Might not really get to it until next week.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Lead

Monotypic species? Please clarify. Gug01 (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

The following from paragraph 2: The mountain nyala are shy and elusive by nature. These animals form highly cohesive herds. Four to five individuals may congregate for short intervals of time to form small herds. See below:

If the mountain nyala are shy and elusive, how do they form herds? Gug01 (talk) 23:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified.

If the herds are so cohesive, then why do they last for "short intervals of time"? Gug01 (talk) 23:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "cohesive", it is a confusing term here and meaning is no clearer even in the source.

The following: half of the world population of the mountain nyala. This implies the mountain nyala is present throughout the world. Gug01 (talk) 23:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.

Taxonomy & Description

Good job. Gug01 (talk) 23:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior & Ecology

The following: hot midday and colder times. What are the "colder times" referred to? Gug01 (talk) 23:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed

See this: These animals form highly cohesive herds. Four to five individuals may congregate for short intervals of time to form small herds. However, groups containing as many as 100 individuals have been reported from the Bale Zone, composed of several family units moving in and out periodically. Again, same problem mentioned in lead. Gug01 (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed the issues above.

Males are not territorial, and have home ranges covering 15–20 km2 (5.8–7.7 sq mi) in the wet season. If they are not territorial, then how do they have territories? Clarification needed. Gug01 (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Home ranges are not synonymous to territories. The animal visits the home range regularly, while territories are areas which it not only visits but guards as well. This "guarding" behavior is lacking in this species.

I see. Thank you for the clarification. Gug01 (talk) 23:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any predators of the mountain nyala? Gug01 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added.

See following: Males are not territorial. Males have home ranges covering 15–20 km2 (5.8–7.7 sq mi) in the wet season. The repetition of males sounds very clunky. Gug01 (talk) 23:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I spoiled it when I edited it last. Fixed now. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Habitat & Distribution

Now-a-days -> Nowadays Gug01 (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

Threats & Conservation

Good work. Gug01 (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Are you sure the mountain nyala is not critically endangered? Seems like it is CR. Then again, one never knows. Gug01 (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am following the IUCN source mentioned in the article. I don't think it is outdated. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 04:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I check for myself and it turns up as endangered. It's probably one of the things in debate, but since it's currently endangered, please don't do any changes. Gug01 (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to Humans

Why are the Oromo even mentioned? This may be put on the Oromo article, but has no point here. There is no point in talking about the Oromo if the effect on each other is negligible. Gug01 (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed except for a mention about hunting. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 04:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking on this review and appreciating my work at places. I have replied to all comments, let me know if there are any more issues. 04:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

The whole article is good work. "Good work" is simply an unnecessary filler I used for sections with no problems. Gug01 (talk) 23:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gug01: I guess there are no more issues now. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you are right. I was just really busy and didn't get around to it. Gug01 (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Information[edit]

This article is missing information on the animal's discovery which needs to be added to the article. It was once considered a myth and cryptid before its discovery. This needs to be reflected in the article and should be a part of the WikiProject Cryptozoology. A lot of people take for granted the history surrounding the discovery of a species which is of High significance, and how some animals were once considered legends and sought by Cryptozoologists. Hopefully information as important as this is reflected into all articles as it's just as important and a part of the animal as the rest of the information in the articles.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mountain nyala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160128041346/http://w.ewca.gov.et/sites/default/files/MalcolmEvangelistaMountainNyalaReport_0.pdf to http://w.ewca.gov.et/sites/default/files/MalcolmEvangelistaMountainNyalaReport_0.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weight ranges of the mountain Ayala[edit]

Hi, all -- I'm a newbie here. I was reading up on the mountain nyala for purposes of my own (thank you, by the way, for the good article, as always) when I noticed that the weight ranges and units stated for it seemed improbable, at least to me. I don't see how a four-foot-high animal could weigh 600 pounds. Thank you in advance for taking a second look. -- George (Harpswell, Maine, USA) 2601:184:80:11F0:78BE:FC5F:AB49:F83 (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions