Talk:Nebraska Initiative 416

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Nebraska Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Nebraska may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVE by consensus with the assistance of multiple admins to perform CSD#G6 to make room for the moves. Tiggerjay (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

–

Unnecessary disambiguation 82.132.139.249 (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Are these amendments etc numbered 1 2 3 4 starting again at 1 in each year, or did the count start when the state was founded? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In the case of Nebraska, they are (evidently) numbered sequentially, from whenever they started. In the case of Colorado, the measure passed, becoming the 43rd Amendment to the constitution, and the year it passed is clearly not needed. In Arizona they are clearly not numbered sequentially, as Arizona Proposition 107 on the same subject was in 2006, and failed. This one, 102 in 2008, passed, adding Article 30 to the constitution, and the article might more appropriately be titled Arizona Constitution Article 30. Apteva (talk) 05:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support In the absence of a naming conflict, prefer the more concise name. --BDD (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support moves to Nebraska Initiative Measure 416 and Colorado Amendment 43, and alternative proposal to move to Arizona Constitution Article 30. The current formats are completely contrary to our naming conventions, see particularly WP:Precision and WP:DAB. Andrewa (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to Arizona Constitution Article 30. Three original proposals are fine. Ron 1987 (talk) 07:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See also Talk:Arizona Proposition 200 (2004)#Move? – Wbm1058 (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
see: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Requested moves – this discussion needs moved to a higher level. Wbm1058 (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support; much better fit for our article title criteria, and there's nothing to disambiguate... bobrayner (talk) 22:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, disambiguation seems unneeded. Insomesia (talk) 00:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nebraska and Colorado moved, waiting on CSD on Arizona to complete moves. Tiggerjay (talk) 07:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Cfd notice[edit]

The related Category:Nebraska ballot measures, 2000 has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.