Talk:Oblivious

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 18 October 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oblivious → Oblivious (disambiguation) – Now that Obliviousness has been created, it should serve as the primary topic for this term; move this page and retarget this title to Obliviousness. BD2412 T 20:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ apart from the game show all others are stubs and don't appear that notable. All Google results (other than the videoes) appear to be for this. Images also appears to mainly show this but Books seems to be split. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to weak support per Dohn joe. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Premature request, as Obliviousness was just created - we don't know how popular of a page it will become. In the meantime, a couple of the "Oblivious" topics have reasonable pageviews and significance - in particular, the Aztec Camera song, which was a top-20 song in its day. An expanded dictdef page that wasn't created until late 2020 is not an obvious automatic primarytopic. Let's revisit when we have more evidence. Dohn joe (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, per above comment. In addition, Oblivious would be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to a different word, so would need to show most readers clearly looking for that other topic. Station1 (talk) 07:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The plain meaning of "oblivious" is (now) at Obliviousness, and other uses of the word stem from that definition. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Peter James (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.