Talk:Oneiromancy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Someone Needs to Finish This[edit]

This was last updated in January and it still has placefillers.

I don't know enough about dream interpretations to finish it, I was actually looking for this information, so if any kind soul will be a fine gentle(wo)man and do your civic duty, the world will be a better place.

The way forward, and Oneiromancy[edit]

Questions:

  1. This article has various "to be written" parts. Isn't this against Wikipedia policy?
  2. This article covers—or tries to cover—both psychological dream interpretation and mantic or spiritual methods. I look at Oneiromancy and wonder if maybe we should consider the articles together.
  • We could combine the article, presumable into "Dream interpretation," which would cover both topics.
  • We could separate the topics; everything "magical," "mantic" or "spiritual" would go to Oneiromancy (with a suitable in-article reference). "Dream interpretation" would only cover psychological theories.

What do people think? Lectiodifficilior 03:35, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am speaking to you from the future; can you hear me past? It looks like this page doesn't get a lot of visitors. It seems the article "dream interpretation" was merged into "oneiromancy", which strikes me as a little backwards. Most pages reach here through a redirect (the few that don't are your and my user pages, some pages on magic, and i before e except after c); dream interpretation is the most popular redirect, and unless there are protests, I'm going to move this page there in a week or so. --Mgreenbe 17:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move[edit]

Closed. Manually merging contemporary material into the latter page. --Mgreenbe 10:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you believe I came back to change my vote and say exactly that? Actually it looks pretty straightforward by the light of day. AvB ÷ talk 13:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what you meant? Wait, let me move all that stuff back... :) --Mgreenbe 16:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Result looks good to me. This is a compliment. ;-)  AvB ÷ talk 22:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting[edit]

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support. Oneiromancy is a more specific term, and doesn't merit its own page — for now, at least. --Mgreenbe 16:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I performed the original merge. I believe this was a mistake. The pages should be separate, but oneiromancy deserves its own page. freestylefrappe 18:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- Dream interpretation is a superset of e.g. Oneiromancy and various forms of (psychological) dream interpretation. Oneiromancy assumes supernatural input into the dream process and/or the interpretation process: the dream is used to predict the future (Wordsmith). Freud combined information gathered from dreams with a set of symbols in order to explain the person's past and present feelings and behavior. Others try to activate dreamers to discover possible hidden meanings in their own dreams. AvB ÷ talk 23:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

Anyone awake, or all you all dreaming? --Mgreenbe 16:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here, not sure about anyone else. Anyway, unlike you, I would say your position means Oneiromancy can have its own article until someone creates a general Dream interpretation article. To me that would be the right time to merge Oneiromancy into Dream interpretation... AvB ÷ talk 23:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand the comment. Are you saying that contemporary theories of dreaming are in fact oneiromancy and all is right with the world? Or are you saying that WP:RM is too heavy-handed and I should cut the modern stuff and paste over the redirect? --Mgreenbe 23:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(1) you say oneiromancy is a special case of dream interpretation, I say the same thing (2) You want to move (for now), I want to keep things as they are (for now). (3) I Try to convince you that the special case cannot be moved to the main class unless the main class explains about itself being a main class and oneiromancy as a special case
Or perhaps I should just demonstrate what I mean - or try again tomorrow after a good dream or so (it's late here). AvB ÷ talk 00:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Right, okay, I agree entirely. It's late here too (2:51am here in Haifa), so whoever gets to it tomorrow first...wins? --Mgreenbe 00:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning[edit]

Grammatically, wouldn't Oneiromancy literally be the manipulation or controlling of dreams, not the interpretation of such? 68.102.179.135 08:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Oneirocritic literature[edit]

The article on Oneirocritic literature seems to overlap with this one. Neither article is overlong. They might do better together as a single article. What do we think? --DanielRigal (talk) 21:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has since been merged with Dream dictionary. -- Beland (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

link rot[edit]

The Heessel link doesn't work. 71.163.117.143 (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to Restructure of Main article "Dream"[edit]

In an ongoing restructure of Wikipedia's Dream article, some detail content currently there will be moved here, and this Oneiromancy article will be highlighted there for readers seeking details. Canhelp (talk) 15:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]