Talk:Oriental Review

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some more sources[edit]

Some of the sources I found doing research on New Eastern Outlook have information about Oriental Review[1][2] and some more "in-depth" on the role in Facebook antics.[1][2] And this one has some quotes from them on climate change.[3] Thanks for liking my draft on NEO. HouseOfChange (talk) 04:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Treasury Sanctions Russians Bankrolling Putin and Russia-Backed Influence Actors". United States Department of the Treasury. March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2022. Russia's SVR directs two additional disinformation outlets, New Eastern Outlook and Oriental Review. Both media outlets spread many types of disinformation about international organizations, military conflicts, protests, and any divisive issues that they can exploit. Recently, both outlets spread false information to undermine COVID-19 vaccines... In 2022, Oriental Review shared content that denigrated the United States' handling of the ongoing crisis in Ukraine. New Eastern Outlook and Oriental Review are being designated pursuant to E.O. 14024 for being owned or controlled by, or for having acted or purported to act for or on behalf, directly or indirectly, the GoR.
  2. ^ Gordon, Michael R.; Volz, Dustin (March 7, 2021). "Russian Disinformation Campaign Aims to Undermine Confidence in Pfizer, Other Covid-19 Vaccines, U.S. Officials Say". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 28, 2022. New Eastern Outlook and Oriental Review, the official said, are directed and controlled by the SVR, or Russia's foreign intelligence service. They present themselves as academic publications and are aimed at the Middle East, Asia and Africa, offering comment on the U.S.'s role in the world.

Need a second opinion[edit]

Dear Randykitty, I've serious doubt on the notability of this journal. Could you please advise on how to proceed ahead as per the NPP rules? -Hatchens (talk) 07:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, it's not an academic journal but a magazine. Not surprisingly, it doesn't meet any of the criteria of WP:NJournals. To be notable, it needs to meet WP:GNG, but I currently lack the time to look into these sources to see whether they comply. --Randykitty (talk) 08:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]