This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it talks about a product that is well-used in the open source community. — Cosenal (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is a well known open source project:
- — gh5046 (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Re: Speedy deletion
I removed the speedy deletion request from this page. The user that added it is known to abuse this process.
Synchronization between servers
"So that ownCloud justifies the term cloud, synchronization between different ownCloud servers is being worked on."
The Motivation section is irrelevant , redundant and anachronic . Irrelevant, because the software have nothing to do with the NSA, this software by itself does not prevents external surveillance . Redundant, because the NSA surveillance is just an special case of privacy and control concerns, the original motivation of this software already predates that. Anachornic since the original motivation predates the NSA scandal. Is there any good argument to not delete that section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsamuef (talk • contribs) 14:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Release Version & Date
Changed 5.0.13 to 5.0.12 because software was at the time still at 5.0.13 Release Candidate, not in stable version — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)