Talk:Pillau-class cruiser

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pillau-class cruiser article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pillau-class cruiser has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Pillau-class cruiser is part of the Light cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 14, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
February 25, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
March 16, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pillau class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 07:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;

and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Looking good in terms of MOS. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiable with no original research:

Well-cited, and references all noted duly. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);

and

(c) it contains no original research.

Broad in its coverage:

As far as I can tell, it covers all coverable aspects of the subject. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;

and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Article displays good neutrality on its subject. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

No sign of edit warring/disputes in the history link. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

No images at present, but while it is preferred, it isn't mandatory. At least this way we know for sure that all current image use in the article follows copyright law! ;) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content;

and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Comments:

"[Pillau] assisted the badly damaged battlecruiser SMS Seydlitz reach port on 2 June" I understand this means that the ship helped the other ship to reach port, but when "assisted" is the synonym of "help" used, isn't it better grammar to say "in reaching port"? I am not 100% certain of this, so please ignore this if it is alright. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the current version is better. Think of it this way: "Steve helped Joe study for..." instead of "Steve helped Joe in studying for..." Parsecboy (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Alright then. That's about the only thing that caught me in this review. This is a very well-written page, and will finally get the classification it deserves! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions