Talk:Procyanidin dimer

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Procyanidin dimers per WP:CAPS -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B type proanthocyanidin → Procyanidin Dimers – More appropriate name (proanthocyanidin is an umberella term) Markwdck (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/Question – Are proanthocyanidins the same as procyanidins, or do two of the latter make one of the former? Even if move is appropriate in concept, should be to procyanidin dimers per WP:CAPS. ENeville (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Please confirm classification[edit]

The WikiProject classification for Procyanidin dimer is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set |class=Stub on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 18:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]