Talk:Protocol Concerning the Redeployment in Hebron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


untitled[edit]

Reference to the original Hebron accord signed by the Peres admin is missing from the article? The original meeting at Erez was for October 1996 after Defence Minister Yitzhak Mordechai confirmed (11 Oct 1996) that Israel wanted to bring changes to the original accord on Hebron... Is there a good reason for missing these bits outAshley kennedy3 (talk) 15:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

eh?[edit]

The lead is confusing. What do "began" and "concluded" mean? It only lasted 8-10 days? I guess the language is confusing the protocol and the process of agreeing to the protocol. Can someone with the time and understanding please rewrite the first few sentences? Zerotalk 03:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Under full Israeli military control? Don't think so.[edit]

I've added "citation needed" to the final sentence of the lead-in as I don't think it's true. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/hebron.html says "The Palestinian Police Forces (PPF) exercise full control over "H1", while the IDF are not allowed to enter, unless escorted by Palestinian security forces" which appears to directly contradict the unsupported assertion ... Sswitcher (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Protocol Concerning the Redeployment in Hebron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]